Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences
Jinan, Shandong, 250117, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07340515
This multicenter, open-label, randomized Phase III trial evaluates intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
All patients receive induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy and are randomized 1:1 to IMPT or IMRT during the concurrent treatment phase.
The primary endpoints are the incidence of grade ≥3 acute treatment-related toxicities and the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, objective response rate, late toxicities, and quality of life.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Jinan, Shandong, 250117, China
Location status: Recruiting
This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized Phase III clinical trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Eligible patients are adults aged 18 to 70 years with histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (WHO type II or III) and clinical stage T4 or N3 disease without distant metastasis (M0), according to the AJCC staging system.
All enrolled patients will receive three cycles of induction chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine plus cisplatin. This will be followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy. During the concurrent treatment phase, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IMPT or IMRT, delivered according to protocol-defined target delineation, dose prescription, and fractionation schedules.
The first primary endpoint is the incidence of grade ≥3 acute treatment-related toxicities, defined as treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurring from the initiation of radiotherapy to 90 days after completion of radiotherapy. Toxicities will be graded according to CTCAE version 5.0 and RTOG criteria. Ototoxicity, including hearing loss or tinnitus, will be further evaluated using the ASHA (1994) significant change criteria for pure-tone audiometry.The second primary endpoint is the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, defined as the proportion of patients who remain alive without documented disease progression within 3 years after randomization. Disease progression is defined as locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause; locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), defined as the time from enrollment to the first occurrence of locoregional recurrence; distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of distant metastasis; objective response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), assessed at 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy and at 3 months after completion of radiotherapy; incidence of grade <3 acute toxicities; and incidence and severity of late treatment-related toxicities assessed according to CTCAE version 5.0.Quality of life will be evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30, version 3.0) and the Head and Neck Cancer-specific module QLQ-H&N35 (version 1.0), administered at baseline, at the end of treatment, and during follow-up visits.
The trial aims to determine whether IMPT can reduce treatment-related toxicities while maintaining or improving disease control and survival outcomes compared with IMRT.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants assigned to this arm receive intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) according to the protocol-defined dose and fractionation schedule. Radiotherapy is delivered using the same target delineation and prescription principles as IMRT, with dose converted to Gy(RBE) for proton therapy. IMPT is administered concurrently with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and toripalimab as specified in the study protocol.
Participants assigned to this arm receive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) according to the protocol-defined dose and fractionation schedule. Radiotherapy is delivered to the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes following the target delineation and prescription principles specified in the study protocol. IMRT is administered concurrently with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and toripalimab, consistent with the protocol.
Cisplatin is administered during induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy as specified in the protocol: 80 mg/m² IV on Day 1 every 21 days for 3 cycles during induction (GP regimen), and 100 mg/m² IV on Day 1 and Day 22 for 2 cycles during concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Toripalimab 240 mg is administered every 3 weeks during induction, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and maintenance therapy for a total of 12 cycles unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
Time frame: From the start of radiotherapy to 90 days after completion of radiotherapy
The proportion of patients who experience treatment-related grade ≥3 acute toxicities, defined as adverse events occurring from the start of radiotherapy to 90 days after completion of radiotherapy, assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Ototoxicity (hearing loss or tinnitus), if present, will additionally be evaluated using the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA, 1994) significant change criteria.
Time frame: 3 years
Defined as the proportion of participants who remain alive and progression-free at 3 years after randomization, with progression-free survival events defined as disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: 3 years
Defined as the time interval from randomization to death due to any cause.
Time frame: 3 years
Defined as the time from randomization to the date of first locoregional relapse.
Time frame: 3 years
Defined as the time interval from randomization to the date of first distant metastasis.
Time frame: 2 weeks after induction chemotherapy and 3 months after completion of radiotherapy
Defined as the proportion of participants who achieve a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Tumor response will be evaluated 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy and 3 months after completion of radiotherapy.
Time frame: From the start of radiotherapy to 90 days after completion of radiotherapy
The proportion of participants who experience treatment-related acute adverse events of grade <3. Acute toxicities include anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, oral mucositis, anorexia, xerostomia, dermatitis/skin inflammation, fatigue, vomiting, weight loss, and hearing loss.
Time frame: From 90 days after completion of radiotherapy up to 3 years
The proportion of patients who experience treatment-related late toxicities occurring more than 90 days after completion of radiotherapy, assessed according to CTCAE version 5.0 and RTOG late radiation morbidity scoring criteria.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30, version 3.0). The QLQ-C30 consists of multi-item functional scales, symptom scales, and a global health status/quality of life scale. All scale scores range from 0 to 100. For functional scales and global health status, higher scores indicate better functioning or quality of life, whereas for symptom scales, higher scores indicate worse symptom burden.Assessments will be performed before treatment, during treatment, and after completion of treatment.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Head and neck cancer-specific quality of life will be evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck Module (QLQ-H&N35).The QLQ-H&N35 is a disease-specific module designed to assess symptoms and functional impairments related to head and neck cancer and its treatment. All scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse symptom severity or functional impairment.Assessments will be conducted before treatment, during treatment, and after completion of treatment.
Man Hu
Other
A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Study Comparing Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07706985
Carcinoma, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07590024
Carcinoma, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07618078
Carcinoma, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07459296
Carcinoma, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Nanning, Guangxi, China
View Trial Details