hemodialysis
Proceduregroup 1: twice weekly, four hours
NCT Number: NCT00417105
Although remarkable progress has been made, chronic kidney disease still poses a major burden on both individual patients, as well as on society as a whole. There is a strong inverse relationship between decreasing renal function, as estimated by glomerular filtration rate, and mortality rate, especially death due to cardiovascular disease. The exact cause(s) remain to be elucidated. Uremic toxins might play an important role.
In the course of decreasing renal function the concentration of numerous intracellular and extracellular compounds vary from the non-uremic state. But still increasing number of uremic retention solutes are being identified. Renal replacement strategies aim to remove potentially harmful substances from the body. Traditionally much attention has been paid to small water-soluble molecules such as urea nitrogen and creatinine. Based on the results of the recent HEMO and ADEMEX studies, increases of small water-soluble solute removal above the level reached with modern dialysis techniques - hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis (HD, PD) - seem not to be advantageous with regard to patient outcome. These findings may point to the importance of other distinct groups of uremic retention solutes. In view of the data described above, protein-bound solutes might be good candidates.
Several advantages of long duration hemodialysis have been observed, including a better control of blood pressure by decreasing extracellular fluid volume, lowering peripheral vascular resistance and improving endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation. A normalization of heart rate variability and improvement of left-ventricular function was noted as well. Furthermore, anemia control has been shown to be easier and several nutritional parameters improved in patients treated with long duration HD. The therapy results in higher small water-soluble solute removal, phosphate removal and greater elimination of larger molecules (e.g. β2-microglobulin).
It seems an appealing question whether a better control of the serum levels of protein-bound solutes can be achieved by long duration (nocturnal) hemodialysis. This might be another advantage of this therapeutic modality, or may even in part explain the better outcome of patients treated this way.
The study compares intermittent hemodialysis with long nocturnal hemodialysis with respect to serum concentrations of several protein bound uremic toxins, as well as solute removal.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
group 1: twice weekly, four hours
Time frame: 1 dialysis session
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Other
A Multicentric Observational Study on the Removal of Protein-Bound Uremic Retention Solutes in Nocturnal Hemodialysis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04392440
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Diseases
Rochester, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07058909
Acute Kidney Injury, Acute Renal Failure
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02513303
Arteriovenous Fistula, Arteriovenous Malformations
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04696146
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details