NCT Number: NCT02148692
Protective Ventilation With Higher Versus Lower PEEP During General Anesthesia for Surgery in Obese Patients
Postoperative respiratory failure, particularly after surgery under general anesthesia, adds to the morbidity and mortality of surgical patients. Anesthesiologists inconsistently use positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers in the hope that this may improve oxygenation and protect against postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), especially in obese patients. While anesthesiologists tend to use PEEP higher than in non-obese patients. While it is uncertain whether a strategy that uses higher levels of PEEP with recruitment maneuvers truly prevents PPCs in these patients, use of higher levels of PEEP with recruitment maneuvers could compromise intra-operative hemodynamics.
The investigators aim to compare a ventilation strategy using higher levels of PEEP with recruitment maneuvers with one using lower levels of PEEP without recruitment maneuvers in obese patients at an intermediate-to-high risk for PPCs.
We hypothesize that an intra-operative ventilation strategy using higher levels of PEEP and recruitment maneuvers, as compared to ventilation with lower levels of PEEP without recruitment maneuvers, prevents PPCs in obese patients at an intermediate-to-high risk for PPC.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Medical University, Vienna, Austria
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Patient scheduled for open or laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia
- Intermediate-to-high risk for PPCs following surgery, according to the ARISCAT risk score (≥ 26)
- BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2
- Expected duration of surgery ≥ 2 h
Exclusion criteria
- Age < 18 years
- Previous lung surgery (any)
- Persistent hemodynamic instability, intractable shock (considered hemodynamically unsuitable for the study by the patient's managing physician)
- History of previous severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (non-invasive ventilation and/or oxygen therapy at home, repeated systemic corticosteroid therapy for acute exacerbations of COPD)
- Recent immunosuppressive medication (patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy up to two months prior to surgery)
- Severe cardiac disease (New York Heart Association class III or IV, acute coronary syndrome or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmias)
- Invasive mechanical ventilation longer than 30 minutes (e.g., general anesthesia for surgery) within last 30 days
- Pregnancy (excluded by anamneses and/or laboratory analysis)
- Prevalent acute respiratory distress syndrome expected to require prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation
- Severe pulmonary arterial hypertension, defined as systolic pulmonary artery pressure > 40 mmHg
- Intracranial injury or tumor
- Neuromuscular disease (any)
- Need for intraoperative prone or lateral decubitus position
- Need for one-lung ventilation
- Cardiac surgery
- Neurosurgery
- Planned reintubation following surgery
- Enrolled in other interventional study or refusal of informed consent
Treatment and study plan
Lower PEEP
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Postoperative pulmonary complications
Time frame: Five postoperative days
-
Hospital-free days at day 90
Time frame: 90 postoperative days
-
Mortality at day 90
Time frame: 90 postoperative days
-
Postoperative extra-pulmonary complications
Time frame: Five postoperative days
-
Postoperative wound healing
Time frame: Five postoperative days
Secondary outcomes
-
Intra-operative complications
Time frame: Surgery period
complications related to the ventilation strategy (for example: de-saturation, defined as SpO2 ≤ 92%, for > 1 min; hypotension during recruitment maneuvers, as defined by systolic arterial pressure < 90 mmHg for > 2 min)
-
Need for postoperative ventilatory support
Time frame: Five postoperative days
invasive or non-invasive ventilation
-
Unexpected need for ICU admission or ICU readmission within 30 days
Time frame: Five postoperative days
-
Need for hospital readmission within 30 days
Time frame: 30 postoperative days
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Technische Universität Dresden
Other
Collaborators
- European Society of Anaesthesiology
Registry information
Acronym: PROBESE
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2018
- Study completion
- 2018
- First posted
- May 28, 2014
- Registry last updated
- Jan 3, 2019
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Oxygen Reserve Index: Utility as Early Warning for Desaturation in Morbidly Obese Patients
NCT03021551
Body Weight, Morbid Obesity
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsFondaparinux Population Pharmacokinetic to Morbid Obese Patients in Post-operatory Bariatric Surgery
NCT01064596
Body Weight, Morbid Obesity
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsImpact of Reverse Trendelenburg on ONSD in Obesity Surgery
NCT07639502
Body Weight, Morbid Obesity
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsEarly Feasibility for Safety & Device Functionality of SFM Anastomosis Device Used in 3 Procedures (SNAP-S) or (SNAP-PS) or (J-J)
NCT06199635
Body Weight, Morbid Obesity
Santiago, Huechuraba, Región Metropolitana, Chile
View Trial Details