Loop ileostomy
ProcedurePatient undergoing anterior rectal resection will receive loop ileostomy
NCT Number: NCT06650085
Loop ileostomy and loop colostomy are both used as protective stomas after anterior resection. There is a lack of evidence on the superiority of loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy. This is a multicenter, open-label, superiority, individually randomized controlled trial including patients undergoing anterior rectal resection with primary anastomosis and a protective stoma. Patients scheduled for anterior rectal resection are randomized 1:1 to loop ileostomy or loop colostomy intraoperatively. Primary outcome is cumulative stoma-related adverse events within 60 days post-primary surgery (scored using Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients undergoing anterior resection (resection of the rectum and colorectal or coloanal anastomosis) due to a rectal tumour and a protective stoma is planned.
The exclusion criteria are: (1) patient already having a stoma (or another stoma made during surgery), (2) technical inability to create ileo- or colostomy (e.g. previous bowel resection, anatomical factors), (3) age <18 years, (4) inadequate ability to co-operate.
Patient undergoing anterior rectal resection will receive loop ileostomy
Patient undergoing anterior rectal resection will receive loop colostomy
Time frame: Within 60 days from randomization
Stoma-related adverse events score by using Comprehensive Complication Index
Time frame: Within 30 days from randomization
All complications scored using Comprehensive Complication Index
Time frame: Within 30 days from stoma closure
All complications after stoma closure using Comprehensive Complication Index (including only patients who have undergone stoma closure within 1 year from primary surgery)
Time frame: Within 30 days from randomization
Days patient is alive and out of any hospital
Time frame: At 2 months from randomization
Quality of life measured using EORTC Quality of life questionnaires core 30 with colorectal 29 extension (QLQ-C30+QLQ-CR29)
Time frame: Within 1 year from randomization
Kidney function change defined as difference in eGFR before and 1 year after randomization
Time frame: Within 5 years from randomization
Number of patients alive within 5 years from randomization
Time frame: Within 5 years from randomization
Number of patients alive and disease-free within 5 years from randomization (including only patients with M0 at primary operation undergoing radical R0/1 surgery)
Time frame: Within 5 years from randomization
Kidney function change defined as difference in eGFR before and 5 years after randomization
Time frame: Within 5 years from randomization
Number of incision hernias of ostomy site (only patients who have undergone successful stoma closure and alive at 5 years will be included in this analysis)
Time frame: Within 5 years from randomization
Cumulative death-censored successful stoma closure
Time frame: At 5 years from randomization
Quality of life measured using QLQ-C30 with QLQ-CR29 extension
Time frame: At 5 years from randomization
Quality of life measured using EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: At 5 years from randomization
Quality of life measured using low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS scores)
Time frame: At 1 year from randomization
Quality of life measured using low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS scores)
Time frame: At 6 months from randomization
Quality of life measured using low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS scores)
Time frame: At 1 year from randomization
Quality of life measured using EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: At 6 months from randomization
Quality of life measured using EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: At 2 months from randomization
Quality of life measured using EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: At 1 year from randomization
Quality of life measured using QLQ-C30 with QLQ-CR29 extension
Time frame: At 6 months from randomization
Quality of life measured using QLQ-C30 with QLQ-CR29 extension
Time frame: Within 60 days from randomization
Total number of anastomotic leakages reported also with grading (Rahbari et al., 2010)
Time frame: Within 5 years from randomization
Intestinal microbiome (only patients of the Helsinki University Hospital) composition and functional potential during the stoma in place and stabilization of microbiome after stoma closure.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Laura Koskenvuo, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Ville Sallinen, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Other
PROtective ileoStomy Versus ProtectivE Colostomy in Anterior Rectal resectIon - a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized conTrolled studY (PROSPERITY)
Acronym: PROSPERITY
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07616830
Hernia, Incisional Hernia
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05661630
Stoma Colostomy, Stoma Ileostomy
Ankara, Altındağ, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06391398
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04715893
Stoma Colostomy, Stoma Ileostomy
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial Details