Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong
Location contact
Chi Hang Yee, MBBS
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06886321
Conventional treatment options for localized prostate cancer include prostatectomy, radiotherapy and active surveillance. However, prostatectomy and radiotherapy carry certain degree of morbidity, including the risks of urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction and injury to the structures in the proximity. Active surveillance carries the risk of disease progression and psychological distress to the patients. Focal therapy employs the concept of only destroying the significant lesion, resulting in disease cure and improved functional outcome. Among the different options of focal therapy, Irreversible electroporation has evolved over the past decades and can be a reliable treatment option. Our study aims at assess the safety and effectiveness of such treatment in prostate cancer management.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified40 year–85 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Hong Kong
Chi Hang Yee, MBBS
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Prostate Irreversible Electroporation procedure was performed in our institution by a single urologist using an Prostate Irreversible Electroporation device and 18-gauge electrodes (Nanoknife®; Angiodynamics, Queensbury, NY, USA). All patients were positioned in lithotomy position under general anesthesia. A transrectal ultrasound was used to visualize the prostate and a brachytherapy grid was used to place the electrodes. An indwelling catheter was placed to empty the bladder. Four to six electrodes were placed through the perineum via the template grid to surround the targeted lesion. The lesion was defined based on prostate biopsy and MRI images. The active tip varied between 15- and 20-mm exposure. The distances between the electrodes were measured using TRUS and entered into the Nanoknife system. An initial ten pulses were delivered to ensure sufficient current was delivered between the electrodes (20-40 A). If sufficient then the remaining 80 pulses were given.
Time frame: 6-month after treatment
6-month oncological outcome after Prostate Irreversible Electroporation treatment, as defined by multiparametric MRI result of prostate
Time frame: At 6-month and 12-month after treatment
6-month and 12-month functional and oncological outcome after Prostate Irreversible Electroporation treatment by questionnaires and multiparametric MRI result of prostate
Time frame: at 30 day after treatment
30-day complications after study intervention
Time frame: At 12-month after treatment
Presence of histologically proven prostate cancer recurrence on biopsy in suspicious cases
Time frame: At 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month after treatment
PSA change after treatment
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Other
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07574541
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07686380
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07730125
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
View Trial DetailsNCT07667400
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details