Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02380027

PRostate Evaluation for Clinically Important Disease: Sampling Using Image-guidance Or Not?

This evaluates the detection rates of prostate cancer by MRI-targeted prostate biopsy compared to standard 12-core trans-rectal ultrasound guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy. Each participant will be randomly allocated to one of the biopsy tests.

We hypothesise that MRI-targeted biopsy will detect no fewer clinically significant cancers than TRUS biopsy but will detect fewer clinically insignificant prostate cancers than TRUS biopsy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

University College Hospitals

London, United Kingdom

About this study

The classical pathway for the diagnosis of prostate cancer is trans-rectal ultrasound guided (TRUS) biopsy of the prostate following a raised PSA. This is currently the mainstay for prostate cancer diagnosis in the majority of centres. It has many advantages and can be performed routinely under local anaesthetic in an outpatient setting. However it does have some limitations, including the over-diagnosis of insignificant cancer and the under-diagnosis of significant cancer.

An alternative pathway for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with raised prostate specific antigen (PSA) is to perform a multi-parametric MRI to localize cancer and to use this information to influence conduct of a subsequent biopsy, known as an MRI-targeted biopsy. MRI-targeted biopsy has been shown in preliminary studies to detect a similar amount of clinically significant cancer to TRUS-biopsy but may have several advantages, for example in reducing the number of men who require biopsy.

This randomized controlled trial aims to assess the detection rate of clinically significant and clinically insignificant cancer of MRI-targeted biopsy compared to standard 12-core TRUS biopsy in men referred with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who have had no prior prostate biopsy.

A 'clinically insignificant cancer' is cancer which is unlikely to progress or affect a man's life expectancy and therefore does not warrant treatment. However when diagnosed with insignificant cancer a large proportion of patients request treatment in case a more significant cancer is present. A prostate cancer detection pathway that finds significant cancers while avoiding the diagnosis of insignificant cancer is a major unmet need.

The potential implications of this trial include:

  • A redefining of the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway
  • A reduction in the number of patients undergoing prostate biopsy
  • A reduction in the number of biopsy cores taken per patient
  • A reduction in biopsy-related sepsis, pain and other side effects
  • A reduction in the over-diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer
  • A reduction of the economic burden of diagnosing and treating prostate cancer

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men at least 18 years of age referred with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who have been advised to have a prostate biopsy
  • Serum PSA ≤ 20ng/ml within the previous 3 months
  • Suspected stage ≤ T2 on rectal examination (organ-confined prostate cancer) within the previous 3 months
  • Fit to undergo all procedures listed in protocol
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior prostate biopsy
  • Prior treatment for prostate cancer
  • Contraindication to MRI (e.g. claustrophobia, pacemaker, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 50mls/min)
  • Contraindication to prostate biopsy
  • Men in whom artifact would reduce the quality of the MRI
  • Previous hip replacement surgery, metallic hip replacement or extensive pelvic orthopaedic metal work
  • Unfit to undergo any procedures listed in protocol

Treatment and study plan

MRI

Device

This will be a multi-parametric MRI of the prostate

MRI-targeted biopsy

Procedure

This will be a biopsy targeted to suspicious areas on the MRI

TRUS-biopsy

Procedure

This will be a standard 12 core trans-rectal prostate biopsy

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of men with clinically significant detected

    Time frame: When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of men in MRI arm who avoid biopsy

    Time frame: When MRI results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-MRI

  2. Proportion of men with MRI score 3, 4 or 5 who have no clinically significant cancer detected

    Time frame: When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

  3. Proportion of men who go on to definitive treatment for prostate cancer

    Time frame: After treatment decision, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

    Definitive treatment can be localised (e.g. radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, brachytherapy) or systemic (hormone therapy, chemotherapy)

  4. Cancer core length of the most involved biopsy core (maximum cancer core length)

    Time frame: When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

    Cancer core length in mm

  5. Proportion of men with post-biopsy adverse events

    Time frame: 30 days post biopsy

  6. EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life scores

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 hours post intervention and 30 days post intervention

    EQ-5D gives a measure of health-related quality of life. The descriptive system gives a weighted index score from 0-1 where 1 is perfect health and 0 is the worst health possible. The visual analogue score is a measure of overall self-rated health status where 100 is the best imaginable health state and 0 is the worst imaginable health state.

  7. Proportion of men undergoing Radical prostatectomy who have Gleason grade upgrading

    Time frame: An expected average of 90 days post-biopsy

  8. Cost per diagnosis of cancer

    Time frame: 30 days post-biopy

  9. Proportion of men with clinically insignificant detected

    Time frame: When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University College, London

Other

Collaborators

  • Centro de Urologia Argentina
  • Erasmus Medical Center
  • Göteborg University
  • Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center
  • Jewish General Hospital
  • London North West Healthcare NHS Trust
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Mayo Clinic
  • National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • San Raffaele University Hospital, Italy
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
  • The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust
  • University College London Hospitals
  • University Ghent
  • University Hospital Heidelberg
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • University Hospital of Cologne
  • University Hospital, Aachen
  • University Hospital, Bordeaux
  • University Hospital, Lille
  • University of Chicago
  • University of Oulu
  • University of Roma La Sapienza
  • Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Control Trial of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Compared to Standard Trans-rectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Men Without Prior Biopsy

Acronym: PRECISION

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Mar 5, 2015
Registry last updated
May 1, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.