Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03776045

PROState Cancer Patients Initiating Hormone Therapy: Effect of Exercise on CARDIOvascular Health (PROSCARDIO)

This study evaluates whether exercise can reduce treatment-related adverse effects in prostate cancer patients initiating androgen deprivation therapy. Half of recruited participants completed a 3-month exercise intervention, while the other half did not perform any supervised exercise. It was anticipated that exercise would have a positive effect on body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is routinely used as first-line treatment for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. However, it is associated with many side effects such as increased fat mass and reduced skeletal muscle mass, cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic health. Ultimately, these negative changes induced by ADT contribute to reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study evaluates whether 3-months of exercise can mitigate treatment toxicity in prostate cancer patients initiating ADT.

In a parallel groups, prospective, randomised controlled design, participants were randomly allocated to a standard care control group or standard care plus exercise group. The exercise group completed 3-months of combined aerobic and resistance training. The standard care group did not receive any supervised exercise or specific physical activity recommendations. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3-month (post-intervention), and 6-month (follow-up) endpoints.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male
  • Aged 50 to 80 years
  • Histologically confirmed stage I-IV prostate cancer
  • Scheduled for treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist either alone or combined with radiotherapy
  • Anticipated to remain on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for at least the next 6 months
  • Willing and able to give written informed consent.
  • Understand written and verbal instructions in English
  • World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status 0 to 1

Exclusion criteria

  • Previously treated with ADT
  • Diagnosed or suspected metastatic bone disease
  • Absolute contraindications to exercise testing and training as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM, 2010)
  • Prior myocardial infarction or heart failure
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Poorly controlled hypertension (≥ 200/110 mmHg)
  • Uncontrolled supraventricular tachycardia (≥ 100 bpm)
  • Pre-existing severe musculoskeletal, neurological or psychiatric condition that may affect their ability to complete the testing battery or exercise training, as determined by the patient's physician
  • Involvement in any other clinical trial or exercise trial

Treatment and study plan

Standard care plus exercise

Other

The exercise was supervised by exercise science staff in the exercise science facilities at the University of East Anglia, UK. Participants competed two weekly sessions for 12 weeks upon initiating ADT. Each session lasted ~60 min and included aerobic interval exercise on a cycle ergometer (Monark 824E; Varberg, Sweden) followed by resistance training. In addition to the supervised exercise sessions, patients were advised on how to increase their habitual physical activity levels and were encouraged to engage in 30 minutes of self-directed exercise on three days each week (e.g. brisk walking, cycling, home-based resistance training).

Primary outcomes

  1. Whole body fat mass (kg)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month endpoint

    Whole body fat mass was measured with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and concurrent bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) with a single-frequency, phase-sensitive 50 kilohertz bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA-101, RJL/Akern Systems, Florence, Italy). This was chosen as the primary outcome because adiposity has shown a high propensity to increase during the initial phases of androgen deprivation therapy, more so than other measures (Galvao et al. 2011), which highlights the importance of targeting body fat at this stage of treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Whole body fat mass (kg)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 6-month endpoint

    Whole body fat mass was measured with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and concurrent bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) with a single-frequency, phase-sensitive 50 kilohertz bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA-101, RJL/Akern Systems, Florence, Italy). This was chosen as the primary outcome because adiposity has shown a high propensity to increase during the initial phases of androgen deprivation therapy, more so than other measures (Galvao et al. 2011), which highlights the importance of targeting body fat at this stage of treatment.

  2. Whole body fat-free mass (kg)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Whole body fat-free mass was measured with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and concurrent bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) with a single-frequency, phase-sensitive 50 kilohertz bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA-101, RJL/Akern Systems, Florence, Italy). This method is highly valid for measuring changes in body composition (Savastano et al. 2010).

  3. Anthropometric measurements (cm)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Waist, hip, mid-upper arm, forearm, mid-thigh and calf circumferences were measured with a non-stretching tape using standard techniques.

  4. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak, ml/kg/min)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Determined as the highest oxygen consumption (V̇O2) attained during the cardiopulmonary exercise test

  5. Ventilatory anaerobic threshold (ml/kg/min)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Estimated using the modified V-slope method and confirmed by evaluating ventilatory equivalents and end-tidal pressures. Two analysts independently determined the ventilatory anaerobic threshold, with discrepancies of ≥ 7.5% resolved through discussion and consultation with a third analyst if necessary.

  6. Ventilatory equivalents for O2 (V̇E/V̇O2) and CO2 (V̇E/V̇CO2)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Ratio of minute ventilation to O2 consumption and CO2 output at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold

  7. Oxygen pulse (ml/beat)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Ratio of oxygen consumption to heart rate at peak exercise during the cardiopulmonary exercise test

  8. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Determined as the linear relationship between oxygen uptake and the logarithmic transformation of minute ventilation during the cardiopulmonary exercise test

  9. Concentration of cholesterol (mmol/L)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Concentrations of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) were measured from venous blood.

  10. Concentration of triglycerides (mmol/L)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    The concentration of triglycerides was measured from venous blood.

  11. Concentration of testosterone (nmol/L)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Concentration of total testosterone was measured from venous blood.

  12. Concentration of sex hormone binding globulin (nmol/L)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Concentration of sex hormone binding globulin was measured from venous blood.

  13. QRISK®2-2017 score

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    The percent risk of a cardiovascular disease event occurring in the next 10 years was calculated with QRISK®2-2017 Web Calculator (https://qrisk.org/2017). The total score ranges from 0 to 100 %, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of cardiovascular disease.

  14. Gleason score

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Gleason scores were measured from prostate biopsies. A score of 1 to 5 is assigned to the cells that make up the largest area of the tumor and another score of 1 to 5 is assigned to the cells that comprise the next largest area. A total Gleason score is then calculated by adding both of these scores together. Total scores ranged from 2 to 10, with 2 representing the most well-differentiated tumors and 10 the least-differentiated tumors.

  15. Prostate specific antigen (ng/mL)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Concentration of prostate specific antigen was measured from venous blood.

  16. Skinfold thickness (mm)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Skinfold thickness was measured at suprailiac and subscapular sites with a skinfold caliper (Harpenden Skinfold Caliper, Baty International, Sussex, UK).

  17. Hand grip strength (kg)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Hand grip strength was measured with an analogue dynamometer (Takei Scientific Instruments Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

  18. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire (version 4)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Disease-specific health-related quality of life was assessed with the FACT-P 39-item questionnaire (version 4). Each item has a 5-point Likert-like response scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"). A total score is calculated as the sum of each score from items 1 to 39, which can range from 0 to 156. Negatively worded items are reverse scored (subtracted from 4) prior to summing so that higher total scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

  19. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale (version 4)

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    Fatigue was assessed with the 13-item FACIT-Fatigue scale (version 4). Each item has a 5-point Likert-like response scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"). A total score is calculated as the sum of each score from items 1 to 13, which can range from 0 to 52. Negatively worded items are reverse scored (subtracted from 4) prior to summing so that higher total scores indicate less experience of fatigue.

  20. Godin Leisure-Time Exercise questionnaire

    Time frame: Adjusted mean difference between groups at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise questionnaire was used to characterise levels of physical activity. The questionnaire contains three items and asks the patient to recall the number of bouts of strenuous, moderate, or mild physical activity that exceed 15 min in duration in which they have engaged in over a typical week. A total score is calculated by multiplying the number of strenuous, moderate, and mild physical activity bouts by weights of 9, 5, and 3, respectively, and summing those values in an overall score that ranges from 0 to 119 in arbitrary units. Higher scores indicate participation in higher levels of physical activity.

  21. Number of recruited participants

    Time frame: Descriptive statistics reported during the two-year recruitment period

    Measured as the number of eligible participants who were eligible and consented to participate in the trial. This will be reported in a Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) participant flowchart.

  22. Number of adverse events

    Time frame: Descriptive statistics reported during the 3-month intervention period

    The number of adverse events were recorded to determine the feasibility of the exercise intervention. An adverse event was defined as the occurrence of any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the exercise intervention. The type of adverse events was also noted.

  23. Attrition rate

    Time frame: Descriptive statistics reported during the 3-month intervention period.

    Established as the number of patients in the experimental group who discontinued the exercise intervention

  24. Number of patients who were lost to follow-up

    Time frame: Descriptive statistics reported at 3-month and 6-month endpoints

    In the experimental group, patients lost to follow-up were characterised as those who completed the exercise intervention but did not complete endpoint testing. In the control group, patients lost to follow-up were the number of patients who did not complete endpoint testing.

  25. Average number of exercise sessions completed

    Time frame: Descriptive statistics reported during the 3-month intervention period

    The number of exercise sessions completed by each participant in the intervention group was recorded. These values were than averaged to provide a measure of adherence. The maximum number of exercise sessions that participants could complete was 24, so adherence ranged from 0 to 24 sessions, with higher scores indicating greater adherence.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of East Anglia

Other

Collaborators

  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Exercise in Prostate Cancer Patients Initiating Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Acronym: PROSCARDIO

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Dec 14, 2018
Registry last updated
Dec 14, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.