Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, 0524, Norway
NCT Number: NCT04077359
The primary objective is to evaluate whether one-phase nephrographic CT (experimental) is sufficient to detect urothelial cell carcinoma in patients with hematuria compared to the traditional four-phase CT (control).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Oslo, 0524, Norway
Responsible centers Oslo University Hospital, Aker. Division of Radiology and Nuclear medicine.
Study type: Prospective clinical trial
Study design: One sample paired proportion, non-inferiority study with a 7.5% non-inferiority limit.
Investigational product: One phase nephrographic CT (experimental arm) vs. Four-phase CT (control arm)
Objective:The primary objective is to evaluate whether one-phase nephrographic CT (experimental) is sufficient to detect urothelial cell carcinoma in patients with asymptomatic macroscopic hematuria compared to the traditional four-phase CT (control).
Primary endpoints: The difference in accuracy between the experimental- and control arm.
there will also be a secondary reading in order to asses interobserver variability for both the experimental and the control arm
Sample size: 250 patients
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
the CT consist of four phases; non-enhanced, corticomedullary, nephrographic and excretory phase.
Time frame: all examinations are evaluated immediately after the CT examination. Follow-up ascertainment of UCC diagnosis after one year
the accuracy of the experimental arm will not be worse than the accuracy of the control CT by a margin of more than 7.5%
Time frame: all examinations are evaluated immediately after the CT examination
The difference in false negative rates
Time frame: all examinations are evaluated immediately after the CT examination
The difference in false positive rates
Time frame: all examinations are evaluated immediately after the CT examination. Follow-up ascertainment of RCC diagnosis after one year
The detection rates in the two arms
Time frame: all examinations are evaluated immediately after the CT examination
the difference in AUC of the two arms
Time frame: all examinations are evaluated immediately after the CT examination
The difference in the predictive values of the two arms
Time frame: all examinations are evaluated immediately after the CT examination
The difference in detection of the two arms
Time frame: all examinations are evaluated immediately after the CT examination
The difference in detection in the two arms
Time frame: all examinations are evaluated immediately after the CT examination
The agreement and variability between primary and secondary readers
Oslo University Hospital
Other
Acronym: PROTEHCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03894618
Adenocarcinoma, Anus Diseases
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03190174
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Santa Monica, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03752398
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Solid Tumors
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03511391
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
View Trial Details