Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
Shanghai, China
NCT Number: NCT05340517
The purpose of this study is to compare the advantages and disadvantages of video-assisted rib planting and traditional internal fixation of rib fractures in chest wall stabilization.
The investigators design a new surgical method of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for rib fractures, evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the new surgical techniques with a prospective study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Shanghai, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-≥3 unilateral rib displacement fractures
Exclusion criteria
Give the patient intercostal nerve block and laryngeal mask anesthesia, after that, put the patient in lateral position. Make a 4-6cm posterolateral incision along the lower edge of the scapula,sever latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior and reach the rib surface. Lift the scapula with the abdominal retractor (or xiphoid retractor), Free adhesion tissue inside the scapula and put in the thoracoscopic lens. Free the tissue of the upper and lower edges of the ribs carefully, reset ribs and insert rib plate, which is fixed by 90° electric drill and locking screw.
Other names: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for rib fractures
Time frame: 6 hours after operation
The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS),which is used to evaluate pain scores 6h,12h,and 24h after the operation.
0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.
Time frame: 12 hours after operation
The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS).
0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.
Time frame: 24 hours after operation
The investigators evaluate and record the patients' pain score after operation by visual analog scale (VAS).
0-10 is used to represent different degrees of pain, 0 is painless and 10 is severe pain. The grading criteria of pain were: 0: no pain; 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; 7-10: severe pain.
Time frame: 7 days at most
The investigators record the postoperative drainage of patients.The drainage of chest catheter or negative pressure ball was recorded by the nurse every day after surgery.
Less postoperative drainage means faster recovery and shorter discharge times.
Time frame: During surgery
The investigators record patients' operation time duration.
Time frame: During surgery
The investigators record the length of operative incision.
Time frame: During surgery
The investigators record the intraoperative bleeding of patients.
Time frame: from the date of hospitalization to the date of leave hospital,assessed up to 100 months
The investigators record the treatment costs and calculate per capita treatment costs of patients,which is recorded and counted at the time of discharge.
Total treatment costs include hospitalization, treatment, surgery, medications, and other related expenses.
Time frame: from the date of hospitalization to the date of leave hospital,assessed up to 100 months
Days of stay hospital
Weigang Zhao
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06464302
Fractures, Bone, Rib Fracture Multiple
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04781673
Fractures, Bone, Rib Fracture Multiple
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06533904
Chest Pain, Chest Wall Disorder
Loma Linda, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05865327
Accidental Injuries, Acute Pain
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details