Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04765696

Prospective RELOC-AGE: How Do Housing Choices and Relocation Matter for Active Ageing?

The objective of prospective RELOC-AGE is to study housing choices and relocation and to examine the effects on active ageing among people aged 55+ considering relocation. All data collection will be conducted at baseline and after 1, 3, 5 and 7 years of follow-up.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Conditions

Age range

55 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Active and Healthy Ageing Research Group, Department of Health Sciences Lund University

Lund, 22120, Sweden

About this study

The objective of prospective RELOC-AGE is to study housing choices and relocation and to examine the effects on active ageing among people aged 55+ considering relocation.

Research Questions

  • What aspects of housing, health and participation predict a) relocation to different housing options in the ordinary housing stock; b) residential care facilities; c) remaining in the present dwelling?
  • How is the complex interaction between objective and perceived aspects of housing, health and participation associated with active ageing, and what are the patterns and characteristics of such dynamics?
  • What housing attributes do people aged 55+ considering relocation find important, and to what extent, when making their decisions on housing preferences?
  • How do people aged 55+ considering relocation reason a) regarding different housing options; b) motives for considering and effectuating relocation, and; c) to what extent are their motives fulfilled?

The sample will include people aged 55+ considering relocation. Recruitment will be made from a sub-sample based on waiting lists (n=22 000) among three housing companies in Sweden: Karlshamnsbostäder AB, Örebrobostäder AB, and Riksbyggen. The expected final sample size is n=3000. Quantitative data will be collected through a web survey and one telephone interview at baseline (2021) and by a web survey at follow-ups 2022, 2024, 2026 and 2028. Data on primary and secondary outcomes are based on established questionnaires used in previous research on older people, health, and housing as well as in national public health surveys in Sweden. In addition to primary and secondary outcomes (presented below), the surveys include demographic and socioeconomic characteristics including civil status, education level, economic situation, occupational status, holding a driver license, critical life events (e.g., death of spouse, long-term disease, divorce), original nationality; questions about present housing situation (dwelling characteristics (e.g., type and size of dwelling, location) and neighborhood characteristics (e.g., access to services and green areas), potential and realized mobility, social/cohabiting situation, time spent at home, housing adaptations); use of technical aids for mobility, use of health, social and informal care, thoughts about future housing, reasons related to consideration about relocating and moving intentions. Data on stated preferences in relation to housing will be collected in a specific survey based on a discrete choice methodology. Qualitative interviews will be conducted consecutively with a subsample (n=100) of respondents who have relocated during the follow-up period. Further, linking to register data will be made within the scope of Register RELOC-AGE, which is another part of the larger project.

For quantitative data, descriptive, exploratory, and inferential statistics will be used. For longitudinal analyses, generalized linear models or Cox regression with time-dependent covariates will be applied. Throughout, we will control for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and other potential confounders and compare the results across different cohorts. Quantitative analyses will be conducted using standard statistical software. For analyses of DCE data, we will use the conditional logit model (also referred to as the multinomial logit model) as the reference model, but the analysis will be extended to mixed logit and latent class models to take preference heterogeneity into account. Qualitative interviews will be audio-recorded and transc¬ribed verbatim and principles from Grounded Theory will be used for the analysis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Persons 55 years or older, living in Sweden, listed for relocation at any of the three housing companies Karlshamnsbostäder and Örebrobostäder (public housing companies) and Riksbyggen (a condominium provider)

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe cognitive impairments or insufficient language skills to give informed consent and participate in telephone interviews

Treatment and study plan

No intervention is administered

Other

No intervention is administered, the cohort is followed in order to evaluate the impact of housing and relocation on active ageing outcomes.

Primary outcomes

  1. University of Jyväskylä Active Aging Scale (UJACAS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Active Ageing score to 12 months

    17 items(areas of activity), each to be self-rated regarding goals, ability, autonomy and activity (total scores 0-272)

  2. University of Jyväskylä Active Aging Scale (UJACAS)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Active Ageing score to 36 months

    17 items(areas of activity), each to be self-rated regarding goals, ability, autonomy and activity (total scores 0-272)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Life-space mobility

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Life-space mobility to 12 months

    6 items related to life spaces visited during the past four weeks, whether the person had visited (yes/no), frequency on a four-point scale, and level of dependence on others or technical equipment on a three-point scale)

  2. Life-space mobility

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Life-space mobility to 36 months

    6 items related to life spaces visited during the past four weeks, whether the person had visited (yes/no), frequency on a four-point scale, and level of dependence on others or technical equipment on a three-point scale)

  3. Meaning of home

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Meaning of home scores to 12 months

    28 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a ten-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (very much)

  4. Meaning of home

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Meaning of home scores to 36 months

    28 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a ten-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (very much)

  5. Housing related control beliefs

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Housing related control beliefs scores to 12 months

    24 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)

  6. Housing related control beliefs

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Housing related control beliefs scores to 36 months

    24 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)

  7. Usability in my home

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Usability in my home scores to 12 months

    4 items (selected from original instrument) with statements about aspects of usability rated on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)

  8. Usability in my home

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Usability in my home scores to 36 months

    4 items (selected from original instrument) with statements about aspects of usability rated on a five-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)

  9. Housing satisfaction

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Housing satisfaction scores to 12 months

    One item "Are you happy with the condition of your home?" answered on a five-point scale from 1 (definitely not) to 5 ('yes, definitely)

  10. Housing satisfaction

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Housing satisfaction scores to 36 months

    One item "Are you happy with the condition of your home?" answered on a five-point scale from 1 (definitely not) to 5 ('yes, definitely)

  11. Health-related Quality of life

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Health-related Quality of Life to 12 months

    EuroQol-5d questionnaire (5 items, range 1-5 per item, with higher score indicating worse outcome)

  12. Health-related Quality of life

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Health-related Quality of Life to 36 months

    EuroQol-5d questionnaire (5 items, range 1-5 per item, with higher score indicating worse outcome)

  13. Self-rated health

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Self-rated Health to 12 months

    One item "How would you rate your own health", rated from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent)

  14. Self-rated health

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Self-rated Health to 36 months

    One item "How would you rate your own health", rated from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent)

  15. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Life satisfaction to 12 months

    One item "How satisfied are you with life in general", rated from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)

  16. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Life satisfaction to 36 months

    One item "How satisfied are you with life in general", rated from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)

  17. Housing enabler, functional limitations

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Functional limitations to 12 months

    8 items indicating presence (yes or yes to some extent) /absence (no) functional limitations

  18. Housing enabler, functional limitations

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Functional limitations to 36 months

    8 items indicating presence (yes or yes to some extent) /absence (no) functional limitations

  19. General self-efficacy

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Genreal Self-efficacy to 12 months

    10 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a four-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 4 (totally agree)

  20. General self-efficacy

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Genreal Self-efficacy to 36 months

    10 items with statements to which respondents state agreement on a four-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 4 (totally agree)

  21. Physical exercise

    Time frame: Change from Baseline physical exercise duration/week to 12 months

    Rated as duration per week on five levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more

  22. Physical exercise

    Time frame: Change from Baseline physical exercise duration/week to 36 months

    Rated as duration per week on five levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more

  23. Physical activity

    Time frame: Change from Baseline physical activity duration/week to 12 months

    Rated as duration per week on six levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more

  24. Physical activity

    Time frame: Change from Baseline physical activity duration/week to 36 months

    Rated as duration per week on six levels from 0 minutes to 2 hours or more

  25. Frailty (FRESCH)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Frailty scores to 12 months

    4 items to be answered yes or no

  26. Frailty (FRESCH)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Frailty scores to 36 months

    4 items to be answered yes or no

  27. Satisfaction with mobility opportunities

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Satisfaction with mobility opportunities to 12 months

    One item, rated from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very unsatisfied)

  28. Satisfaction with mobility opportunities

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Satisfaction with mobility opportunities to 36 months

    One item, rated from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very unsatisfied)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Lund University

Other

Collaborators

  • Karlshamnsbostäder AB
  • Ribbingska Foundation in Lund
  • Riksbyggen
  • Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research
  • The Swedish Research Council
  • Örebrobostäder

Registry information

Acronym: RELOC-AGE

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2029
First posted
Feb 21, 2021
Registry last updated
Mar 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.