Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01703351

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Continuous Paravertebral Infusion of Local Anesthetics Versus Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia on Acute and Chronic Neuropathic Pain After VATS Lobectomy

Since mid-2000, thoracoscopic lobectomy has been replaced with conventional open lobectomy and it has reduced the operative morbidities and mortalities. However, thoracoscopic lobectomy also results in operative acute pain and the incidence of chronic pain after thoracoscopic lobectomy has been reported as up to 50%. Penetration of chest wall by trocar, torque at trocar and working window by operator, and compression of intercostal nerves have been suggested as a cause of pain after thoracoscopic lobectomy. The intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) that usually have used to control the operative pain, sometimes cause the side effects such as sedation, nausea and vomiting due to its systemic delivery of analgesics. Because of these side effects, IV PCA has to be discontinues and the effective dose of analgesics could not deliver to patients. In contrast to IV PCA, continuous paravertebral infusion of local anesthetics thorough catheter below the parietal pleura might reduce the side effects of IV PCA and control the operative pain effectively. In this study, we investigate the effectiveness of continuous paravertebral infusion of local anesthetics thorough catheter below the parietal pleura for 60 hours after operation competed to IV PCA.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–78 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Seoul, 120-752, South Korea

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age; 18≥, <75
  • Thoracoscopic lobectomy due to lung cancer or suspected lung cancer
  • Tolerable cardiopulmonary and other systemic function tolerable to lobectomy
  • Karnofsky performance status ≥ 80
  • Agree with study

Exclusion criteria

  • Intolerable to one-lung ventilation
  • Bleeding risk due to Aspirin, coumadin and other drugs
  • Past or current history of depression or other psychiatric disease
  • Pain persisted before operation due to lung lesion
  • History of rib fracture, trauma or lung surgery at the same side of operation
  • Severe pleural adhesion or empyema
  • Open thoracotomy conversion
  • Reoperation due to postoperative bleeding or others
  • Postoperative complications that need ICU care
  • Chemical pleurodesis more than two times after operation
  • Do not agree with study

Treatment and study plan

0.5% ropivacaine

Drug

(n=48); continuous paravertebral infusion of local anesthetics (0.5% ropivacaine, 5cc/hr for 60 hours after operation) thorough catheter below the parietal pleura using On-Q® system(I-flow corp, Lake Forest, CA, USA)

Fentanyl 500mcg + acupan 160mg + nasea 0.6mg

Drug

(n=48); IV PCA (Fentanyl 500mcg + acupan 160mg + nasea 0.6mg, 5cc/hr for 60 hours after operation, 0.5cc bolus if patients feel breakthrough pain)

Primary outcomes

  1. 1. Acute pain

    Time frame: Pain score(Visual Analogue Scale) measured in operative day, POD #1, #2, #3, #4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. 2. Quality of life

    Time frame: measured Quality of life by EORTC QLQ C 30 (V 3.0) in 4, 8, 12 weeks after operation

Other outcomes

  1. 3. Neuropathic pain

    Time frame: VAS score and dose of analgesics in 4, 12 weeks after operation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Oct 10, 2012
Registry last updated
Jan 31, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.