Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04261673

Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Decompressive Ipsilateral Craniectomy for Traumatic Acute Epidural Hematoma

Although craniotomy provides a more complete evacuation of the acute epidural hematoma, there are insufficient data to support specific surgical treatment method. We aim to perform a multi-center, parallel-group randomized clinical trial to compare the outcome and cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for the treatment of traumatic brain injury patients with cerebral herniation undergoing evacuation of an acute epidural hematoma.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Conditions

Epidural Hematoma Brain Herniation Craniotomy Decompressive Craniectomy Hematoma Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal Hemorrhage Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

About this study

The incidence of epidural hematoma (EDH) among traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients has been reported to be in the range of 2.7 to 4%. Among patients in coma, up to 9% harbored an EDH requiring craniotomy. The mortality in patients in all age groups and GCS scores undergoing surgery for evacuation of EDH is approximately 10%. The decision to operate on an acute EDH (AEDH) is usually based on the patient's GCS score, age, pupillary abnormalities, comorbidities, CT findings, associated intracranial lesions, in delayed decisions, the time between neurological deterioration and surgery, and intracranial pressure. An AEDH greater than 30 ml should be surgically evacuated regardless of the patient's Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. There are insufficient data to support one surgical treatment method. However, craniotomy provides a more complete evacuation of the hematoma for patients with an AEDH that require an operation to remove the clot. But whether decompressive craniectomy (DC) should be employed still has considerable controversy. The choice of operative technique is influenced by the surgeon's expertise, training, and evaluation of a particular situation. The difference between these two procedures is that a bone flap is left out before closing the skin in DC. Both approaches are widely used among neurological surgeons (although the indications may differ), therefore there is sufficient experience in the centers to set up a randomized clinical trial.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clear medical history of traumatic brain injury;
  • Within 12 hours after injury;
  • Unilateral mydriasis or bilateral mydriasis before the operation;
  • Acute supratentorial epidural hematoma and signs of brain stem compression on CT scan, representing the leading cause of operation, despite any other minor intracranial injuries associated (e.g., subarachnoid hemorrhage and contusion);
  • The admitting neurosurgeon considers that the epidural hematoma needs to be evacuated with a craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy.
  • With informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous intracranial surgery prior to trauma;
  • Patients with a score of 3 on the GCS, with bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, bleeding diathesis or defective coagulation, or other injuries that were deemed to be unsurvivable;
  • Patients who had injury of the oculomotor nerve;
  • Patients are considered to be operated mainly by following pathological change on CT: subdural hematoma, intracerebral hemorrhage, large size infarction, et al., but not because of epidural hematoma;
  • Severe pre-existing disability or severe co-morbidity which would lead to a poor outcome even if the patient is supposed to a good recovery from the TBI;
  • Pregnant female.

Treatment and study plan

Decompressive Craniectomy

Procedure

A large bone flap must be raised. The evacuation of epidural hematoma is depended on surgeon's preference. The bone flap should not be replaced at the end of the operation. DC has an advantage in controlling brain swelling, but patient is necessary to have another operation of cranioplasty to reconstruct the skull in the future.

Craniotomy

Procedure

A large bone flap must be raised. The evacuation of epidural hematoma is depended on surgeon's preference. However, the bone flap must be replaced and fixed with fixation system (plates and screws). The patient will not need an additional operation to rebuild the skull in the future. But undisciplinable brain swelling and increased intracranial pressure may happen in some patients, and additional decompressive craniectomy is recommended in these cases.

Primary outcomes

  1. GOSE (extended Glasgow Outcome Scale) scores

    Time frame: 6 months post-injury

    The primary outcome is indicated by the long-term functional outcomes, including overall mortality and the score on the "Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale" (GOS-E). "Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale" is the unabbreviated scale title, minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 8, which was scored as follows and higher scores mean a better outcome:

    • death;
    • persistent vegetative state;
    • lower severe disability;
    • upper severe disability (stratum 3 and 4 were considered as severe disability, with permanent requirement for help with daily living);
    • lower moderate disability;
    • upper moderate disability (stratum 5 and 6 were considered as mild disability, without a need for assistance in everyday life, that might, however, require special equipment for employment);
    • lower good recovery;
    • upper good recovery (stratum 7 and 8 were considered as good recovery).

Secondary outcomes

  1. incidence of post-operative cerebral infarction

    Time frame: within 6 months post-injury

    Patients have clinical deterioration after an initial surgery because of post-operative cerebral infarction.

  2. incidence of additional craniocerebral surgery

    Time frame: within 6 months post-injury

    Patients have additional craniocerebral surgical operation as a result of clinical deterioration.

  3. length of stay in hospital

    Time frame: within 6 months post-injury

    The length of patient's stay in hospital after initial surgery, which must due to AEDH related medical treatment. Number of days in hospital are used to evaluate length, and patients with poor treatment effect may need longer hospital stays.

  4. detailed economic evaluation

    Time frame: within 6 months post-injury

    Total medical expense related to treatment of AEDH, including the costs of operations, hospitalization and rehabilitation. Different operations have different medical expense，and patients with poor treatment effect may need more medical expense. We record and evaluate the total medical expense of the entire AEDH treatment process, within 6 months post-injury.

  5. incidence of serious adverse events

    Time frame: within 6 months post-injury

    Serious adverse events (SAE) is defined as an untoward occurrence that:

    • results in death;
    • is life-threatening;
    • requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
    • results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity;
    • is otherwise considered medically significant by the investigator.

  6. quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)

    Time frame: at 1,3 and 6 months post-injury

    Unabbreviated scale title is "5-level EuroQol five dimensions" questionnaire. The EQ-5D is a generic instrument for describing and valuing health. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

  7. MMSE (mini-mental state examination) scores

    Time frame: at 1,3 and 6 months post-injury

    Unabbreviated scale title is "mini-mental state examination", and minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 30. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

RenJi Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
  • Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate Decompressive Craniectomy for Patients With Cerebral Herniation Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Epidural Hematoma

Acronym: PREDICT-AEDH

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 10, 2020
Registry last updated
Oct 1, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.