Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07626671

Prospective MMA Embolization Registry

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common condition, particularly in older adults, that can substantially impair patients' quality of life, functional independence, and neurological well-being. Blood accumulates in the subdural space and persists due to the formation of a highly vascularized outer hematoma membrane. This membrane continuously rebleeds through fragile neovessels, driven in large part by branches of the middle meningeal artery (MMA), preventing spontaneous resolution and promoting hematoma growth. The standard treatment is surgical drainage, but recurrence rates reach up to 30%, largely because surgery does not address the underlying membrane vascularity. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a minimally invasive angiographic procedure that targets this root cause by occluding the arterial supply to the hematoma membrane, thereby reducing rebleeding and promoting resolution. Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated high efficacy and safety of MMAE, both as a standalone treatment and as an adjunct to surgery. Despite this evidence, standardized prospective data on patient selection, predictors of treatment success, and optimal follow-up are still lacking.

PRO-EMMA is a prospective, single-center registry at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, a tertiary center consisting of three separate campuses. Pro-Emma systematically collects clinical, radiological, and procedural data from patients with cSDH who undergo MMAE. In addition to routine clinical care, participants undergo a structured follow-up protocol: CT scans within 7 days and at 3 months after the procedure, and standardized assessments of neurological status, functional outcome, and quality of life - using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Markwalder score, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E), and EQ-5D-5L- before the procedure and at days 30, 90, and 120 post-intervention.

The study tests the hypothesis that MMAE leads to good functional outcomes, rapid hematoma resolution, and low recurrence rates, and that specific clinical, interventional, and imaging features predict treatment success. Findings will help identify which patients benefit most from MMAE, optimize treatment decisions, and establish a practical, evidence-based follow-up standard. The registry aims to enroll 75-150 patients over approximately 12 months.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

Background and Rationale Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common condition, particularly in older adults, that can substantially impair patients' quality of life, functional independence, and neurological well-being. Blood accumulates in the subdural space and persists due to the formation of a highly vascularized outer hematoma membrane, which continuously rebleeds through fragile neovessels driven in large part by branches of the middle meningeal artery (MMA). This prevents spontaneous resolution and promotes hematoma growth. The standard treatment is surgical drainage, but recurrence rates reach up to 30%. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) targets this root cause by occluding the arterial supply to the hematoma membrane. Recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated high efficacy and safety of MMAE, both as standalone treatment and as adjunct to surgery. However, prospective data with standardized, protocol-driven follow-up capturing radiological response, functional status, quality of life at pre-specified time points, and predictive clinical and imaging parameters remain scarce.

Study-Specific Follow-Up Protocol

The MMAE procedure is performed according to clinical routine and standard of care. Study-specific additions consist solely of structured follow-up assessments:

  • Functional Outcome and quality-of-life assessments using GCS, Markwalder score, mRS, GOS-E, and EQ-5D-5L at baseline (pre-intervention) and at days 30, 90, and 120 post-intervention, conducted by structured telephone or in-person interview
  • Imaging follow-up by cranial CT within 7 days and at 3 months post-intervention.

Treatment decisions are made exclusively on the basis of clinical indication and are independent of study participation.

Data Collection

Data are documented in pseudonymized case report forms. The following domains are recorded:

  • Clinical: patient history, GCS, comorbidities, anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy, symptom course
  • Radiological: hematoma volume, architecture, laterality, localization, midline shift, MMA caliber, anatomical MMA variants, foramen spinosum diameter, surgery
  • Procedural: embolic agent, technical details, distribution of embolic agent, degree of distal penetration, complications
  • Clinical: mRS, GOS-E, EQ-5D-5L, Markwalder score at each time point; re-intervention, recurrence, mortality, symptom course

Data Management and Quality Assurance All participants are assigned a pseudonymized study ID. The assignment list is stored separately and encrypted, with access restricted to authorized study personnel only. Data are stored exclusively on Charité servers (clinical data: 10 years; CT imaging data: 30 years), in compliance with DSGVO, BlnDSG, and applicable federal data protection regulations.

Data entries are checked against predefined plausibility and range rules; inconsistencies or out-of-range values are flagged and resolved before analysis. Source data verification is performed by comparing CRF entries against medical records and imaging reports. Missing values are documented and reported in the statistical analysis but will not be imputed.

Statistical Analysis The study is exploratory. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals. Bivariate correlation analyses (Pearson or Spearman as appropriate) and logistic regression models will be used to identify predictors of treatment success. Potential confounders include patient age, anticoagulation status, hematoma architecture, and procedural variables. A sufficient events-per-variable (EPV) ratio will be ensured in all regression models.

Pre-specified Predictor Variables

The following baseline and procedural variables will be analyzed as potential predictors of radiological and clinical treatment outcome:

  • Hematoma morphology on baseline cranial CT, classified according to Nakaguchi et al. (homogeneous, laminar, trabecular, or separated).
  • Middle meningeal artery caliber, anatomical variants, and foramen spinosum diameter on baseline imaging.
  • Presence and type of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy at time of intervention.
  • Degree of distal MMA penetration of embolic agent and type of embolic agent used.

Risks and Burden The primary additional burden from study participation consists of: (1) radiation from up to two study-mandated CT scans (within 7 days and at 3 months post-intervention), performed within diagnostically acceptable dose ranges; and (2) minimal time investment for structured interviews at days 30, 90, and 120 (approximately 10-15 minutes each). No additional medical interventions or modifications to clinical care are introduced by study participation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • CT- or MRI-confirmed chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH)
  • Planned or completed middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE), either as primary treatment or as adjunct to surgical evacuation
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 3 at baseline
  • Written informed consent including agreement to structured follow-up (follow-up CT scans and clinical assessments)
  • Willingness and ability to participate in structured follow-up assessments (telephone and/or in-person interviews)

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute subdural hematoma requiring emergency neurosurgical intervention
  • Missing or incomplete baseline clinical or radiological data
  • Unavailability for prospective follow-up (e.g., no fixed address, no telephone contact)

Treatment and study plan

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization

Procedure

Minimally invasive endovascular procedure in which the middle meningeal artery (MMA) is catheterized and occluded using approved embolic agents, performed as either primary treatment or adjunct to surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma. The procedure is performed according to clinical routine and standard of care; no modification of the clinical treatment is introduced by study participation.

Other names: MMAE, MMA embolization

Primary outcomes

  1. Hematoma volume reduction

    Time frame: 3 months post-intervention

    Percentage change in hematoma volume (mL) or thickness (mm) on cranial CT from baseline to 3-month follow-up. Higher percentage reduction indicates better radiological response.

  2. Functional outcome (mRS)

    Time frame: 90 days post-intervention

    Functional status assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Higher scores indicate worse functional outcome. Change from baseline to day 90 post-intervention.

  3. Re-intervention rate

    Time frame: 120 days post-intervention

    Number of patients requiring any re-intervention, defined as repeat middle meningeal artery embolization or surgical rescue procedure, within 120 days post-intervention. Higher numbers indicate worse outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), day 30, day 90, and day 120 post-intervention

    Health-related quality of life assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) across five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each rated on a 5-point scale (1-5), plus a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS, 0-100). Lower dimension scores and higher EQ-VAS scores indicate better health status. Compared to baseline pre-intervention.

  2. Extended functional outcome (GOS-E)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), day 30, day 90, and day 120 post-intervention

    Functional recovery assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E), an 8-point scale ranging from 1 (death) to 8 (upper good recovery). Higher scores indicate better functional outcome. Compared to baseline pre-intervention.

  3. Neurological status (GCS)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), day 30, day 90, and day 120 post-intervention

    Level of consciousness and neurological status assessed by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), a 15-point scale (minimum 3, maximum 15) evaluating eye (1-4), verbal (1-5), and motor responses (1-6). Higher scores indicate better neurological status. Compared to baseline pre-intervention.

  4. Symptom severity (Markwalder score)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), day 30, day 90, and day 120 post-intervention

    cSDH-specific neurological grading assessed by the Markwalder Grading Scale (MGS), ranging from 0 (no neurological deficits) to 4 (comatose). Lower scores indicate better neurological status. Compared to baseline pre-intervention.

  5. Mortality

    Time frame: 120 days post-intervention

    Number of patients with all-cause mortality within 120 days post-intervention.

  6. Treatment failure

    Time frame: Day 90 post intervention

    Number of patients with absent or insufficient hematoma resolution, defined as less than 50% reduction in hematoma volume on follow-up cranial CT compared to baseline. Higher numbers indicate worse outcome.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jawed Nawabi, MD, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

Leonard Fetscher, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+49 030 450 627 426

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Outcomes of MMA Embolization: A Prospective Single-center Registry Investigating Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Subdural Hematomas

Acronym: PRO-EMMA

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.