Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03821142

Prospective Long-term Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Calistar S for Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Prospective long-term evaluation of the performance and safety of Calistar S for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair in women with anterior POP with or without apical vaginal involvement

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Helios Hospital Erfurt, Department of gynaecology, Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Calistar S Single Incision Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Repair System is intended for transvaginal reestablishment and reinforcement of the physiologic anatomy of the female pelvic floor in non-fertile women with anterior pelvic organ prolapse with or without apical vaginal wall involvement in both, recurrent pelvic organ prolapse and primary pelvic organ prolapse when other surgical procedures are expected to fail (i.e. complex primary prolapse).

The treatment kit consists of the lightweight mesh, two single-use introducers and 3 tissue anchoring system (TAS) anchors for fixation to the sacrospinous ligament. The product is approved in accordance with the CE Directive 93/42/EEC.

The utilization of synthetic implants in POP repair became increasingly popular in the last decade. The cumulative success rate of synthetic implants in anterior compartment repair is as high as up to 93%.However, meshes have been recently scrutinized due to high adverse event reporting after unreflected utilization of meshes which raised concerns of patients safety; furthermore taking into account the complexity of adverse event mesh management. This led to a vanishing of various meshes in transvaginal POP repair. Nevertheless, the further development of light weight meshes, the experience of the surgeon and the assessment and patients selection are well known factors reducing the rate of adverse events significantly.

Therefore, in the current trial the efficacy and safety of calistar S in a highly selected patient population will be evaluated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Non-fertile women > 18 years1 2. Symtomatic anterior prolapse with or without apical vaginal wall involvement according POP-Q score ≥ 2. (Corresponding to Aa, Ba ≥ -1 and where applicable C ≥ -1/2 TVL ).

  • Subjects with recurrent prolapse or complex primary prolapse are eligible for the study.
  • Scheduled mesh-augmented anterior POP repair with Calistar S 5. Signed inform consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Fertile women
  • Patients with active or latent infection of the vagina, cervix or uterus
  • Patients with previous or current vaginal, cervical or uterine cancer
  • Previous, current or planned pelvic radiation therapy
  • Known allergy to polypropylene
  • Subject is unable or unwilling to complete questionnaires (either self-administered, assisted or interviewed) and/or to follow scheduled visits and/or to sign informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Transvaginal mesh for anterior pelvic organ prolapse repair

Device

synthetic mesh for anterior pelvic organ prolapse with or without apical vaginal wall involvement via the vaginal route in a highly selected patient population

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients with Cure of pelvic organ prolapse

    Time frame: 24 months

    Number of patients accomplishing the composite endpoint after 24 months including anatomic, subjective and retreatment components

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of prolapse specific quality of life according the validated Questionnaire Prolapse quality of life questionnaire in comparison between baseline and follow-up

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    Differences between Baseline and Follow-Up result of the questionnaire of each patient regarding Quality of life and the correlating domains will be evaluated. P-QoL, Score: 0-100, the higher the score, the higher the impact of prolapse symptoms and the lower quality of life.

  2. Change of sexual life according the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire in comparison between Baseline and follow-up

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    Differences between Baseline and Follow-Up result of each patient regarding Sexual life and the correlating domains will be evaluated. PISQ-IR, Score: 0-100, the higher the score, the higher the impact of prolapse symptoms and the higher the impact on sexual life.

  3. Change of pain according Visual Analog Scale of Pain in comparison between baseline, postoperative and follow-up

    Time frame: Baseline, 24-48h postoperatively, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    Differences of pain-evaluation between Baseline and Follow-Up of each patient will be evaluated. Wong Baker Pain Scale, Score: 0 - 10, The higher the score, the higher the pain.

  4. Patients subjective evaluation of satisfaction with surgery according the Patient Global Impression of Improvement

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    Evaluation of the improvement of POP after the operation assed by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement of each patient. PGI-I, Score: 7 Likert scale from: very much better to very much worse,

  5. Patient subjective evaluation of POP severity according the Global Impression of Severity

    Time frame: Baseline

    Evaluation of severity categorization by assing the Patient Global Impression of Severity of each patient at Baseline. Score. 4 Likert scale, from no impact to very much impact. A

  6. Change of quality of life according the EQ-5L-5D in comparison between baseline and follow-up

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    Evaluation of Quality of life assessed by the EQ-5L-5D and evaluation of differences between Baseline and Follow-Up of each patient regarding health related Quality of life. Two scores: a) 5 Likert scale from no problems to extreme problems. b) self administered quality of life in scale 0 - 100, the higher the score the better the quality of life.

  7. Anatomical success according the number of patients with anterior vaginal wall at or above the hymen and no decent of apical vaginal wall at or greater than half of the total vanilla lengths

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    Anatomical success defined by the number of patients with the anterior vaginal wall at or above the hymen (Aa and Ba ≤ 0 ) and separately no decent of apical vaginal wall at or greater than half of the total vaginal lengths (C < -½ TVL).

  8. Number of patients with necessity of repeated surgery due to recurrent anterior or apical Number of patients with Repeat surgery due to symptomatic recurrence of anterior or apical POP

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    Number of patients with necessity of repeated surgery due to recurrent anterior or apical POP.

  9. Safety of Calistar S according the number of adverse events

    Time frame: intraoperative, postoperative, 6 weeks, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months and unscheduled visits

    Safety of Calistar S according the assessment of total amount of adverse events

  10. Exposure and anatomical-failure free survival

    Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    Estimation of exposure- and anatomical-failure free survival according Kaplan meier

  11. Number of patients with further surgery for stress urinary incontinence

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    To assess the number of patients with further surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

  12. Change of urinary incontinence according the ICIQ-UI-Sf in comparison between baseline and follow-up

    Time frame: Baseline 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    The international Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence - Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) is a validated questionnaire to asses urinary incontinence. Score 0-21, overall score with greater values indicating increased symptom severity

  13. Change of overactive bladder symptoms according the ICIQ-OAB in comparison between baseline and follow-up

    Time frame: Baseline 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

    The International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire - Overacitve bladder (ICIQ-OAB) is a validated questionnaire.. 0-16 overall score with greater values indicating increased symptom severity

  14. Cure in short-, mid-, and longterm follow-up

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 36, 48, 60 months

    Number of patients accomplishing the composite outcome at remaining follow-up times

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Promedon

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective, Multicenter, 60 Months, Single Arm Cohort Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Ultra-Light-Weight Mesh CAlistar S in Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Acronym: CASPO

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2029
First posted
Jan 29, 2019
Registry last updated
Nov 22, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.