Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
James Nace, DO
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Martin Gesheff
CONTACT
Nirav Patel
CONTACT
Ronald Delanois, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT04814082
Patients with degenerative joint disease can effectively be treated with a primary total knee replacement to reduce pain and improve function in their daily lives. Theoretically, achievement of normal knee motion using a medial pivot design in total knee replacements can be recreated in comparison to single radius designs, which could lead to an improvement in post-surgical outcomes and satisfaction with the procedure. The aim of this study is to compare two types of implant designs (medial pivot and single radius) in a total knee replacement using clinical outcomes, patient reported outcomes, and overall function assessed by a specialized gait laboratory.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, United States
Location status: Recruiting
James Nace, DO
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Martin Gesheff
CONTACT
Nirav Patel
CONTACT
Ronald Delanois, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
This is a single center, cohort study in 100 adult subjects undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty that will receive one of the two total knee device systems.
Primary total knee replacement is an effective treatment for relieving pain and improving function for patients with degenerative joint disease. Recently, design of knee implants in a total knee replacement have received increased interest, particularly the medial pivot designs. Single-radius implants are designed to minimize instability throughout the functional range of movement. Medial pivot total knee designs theoretically recreate more normal knee motion when compared to single radius designs. Both implant designs are commonly used for total knee replacements. Outcomes of TKA are evaluated by multiple methods including implant/device survivorship, radiographic assessments, clinical examinations, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS). Laboratory based gait analysis performed at a specialized research facility is not commonly conducted in patients with positive outcomes post-surgery as this is associated with high cost. There is currently not enough research comparing these two designs directly. Research is required to determine which design may provide better clinical outcomes and satisfaction with the procedure.
In addition to your normal standard clinical care, there will be scheduled pre-operative, operative, 6-week, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month, and 60 month follow-up visits.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Medial Pivot Knee System
Single Radius Design Total Knee System
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
Knee flexion/extension, varus/valgus, and internal/external rotation will be measured (in degrees) and analyzed using the KneeKG system during incline and decline walking.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
This parameter will be measured (in mm) and analyzed using the KneeKG system during incline and decline walking.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
This parameter will be measured (in N) and analyzed using the KneeKG system during normal walking.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
Active and passive range of motion will be measured (in degrees) using a goniometer.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
Quadriceps lag will be measured (in degrees) in both the sitting and supine positions.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
This parameter will be measured in seconds and requires a patient to rise from a chair walk three meters and return to the chair again as quickly as possible.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
This parameter will be measured in seconds and will collect the amount of time it takes a patient to transfer from a seated to a standing position and back to sitting five times.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
This parameter will be measured in seconds and will collect the amount of time a patient is able to stand unassisted on one leg.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
This parameter will be measured in seconds and will collect the amount of time it takes a patient to ascend and descend one flight of stairs (8-14 steps).
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 3 month and 12 month follow-up visit
This parameter will be measured (in lbs/in) using a dynamometer for quadricep muscle strength assessment.
Time frame: Post-operative - 6 week, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month, and 60 month follow-up visit
Radiographic assessment using AP and lateral knee X-rays to analyze implant position, radiolucencies, fracture, and osteolysis.
Time frame: Operative visit; Post-operative - 6 week, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month, and 60 month follow-up visit
All complications related to the procedure will be documented.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 6 week, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month, and 60 month follow-up visit
X-rays will be evaluated to look for presence of a radiolucent area, especially > 2mm, around implant or cement with sclerotic border.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 6 week, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month, and 60 month follow-up visit
25 question items assessing symptoms, patient satisfaction, patient expectation, and their level of functional activity of their knee. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 6 week, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month, and 60 month follow-up visit
42 question items assessing a patient's opinion about their health, symptoms, and function of their knee. Scores range from 0-100 with zero representing severe knee problems and 100 indicating no knee problems.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 6 week, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month, and 60 month follow-up visit
10 question items assessing overall physical, mental, and social health of the patient. Each question item is scored separately on 1-5 scale and total scores are combined into 2 groups - Global Physical Health Score and Global Mental Health score. A T-score is calculated with the 2 previous scores against the general population with a higher T-score representing better outcomes.
Time frame: Pre-operative; Post-operative - 6 week, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month, 36 month, and 60 month follow-up visit
12 question items evaluating how "aware" a patient is of their operative joint during daily activities. Scores range between 0-100 with higher scores indicating a patient is able to forget the joint on a daily basis or low joint awareness.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Martin Gesheff
CONTACT
Nirav Patel
CONTACT
LifeBridge Health
Other
Prospective Functional, Gait, and Outcome Comparison Study of Medial Pivot
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04497129
Arthralgia, Arthritis
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03112200
Arthritis, Bone Marrow Edema
Encinitas, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05975879
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Kazan', Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT03182686
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details