Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01693211

Prospective Evaluation of Circularity and Diameter of Femtosecond Laser Versus Manual Anterior Capsulotomy in Singapore National Eye Centre

This is a prospective, randomized study evaluating the circularity of the anterior capsulotomy performed by the VICTUS femtosecond work station (Group A) versus the manual capsulotomy (Group B) of a minimum of 22 eyes and maximum of 30 eyes per group diagnosed with cataract, scheduled to undergo removal by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in SNEC.

The primary study end point is to determine if the circularity of the created rhexis is better in Group A as compared to Group B.

The secondary study end point is to determine the diameter of rhexis is more precise and reproducible in Group A as compared to Group B.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Singapore National Eye Centre

Singapore, 168751

About this study

This clinical study is a controlled, open, randomized, prospective, single-centre, single-surgeon eye study to determine the precision of intraocular cuts for anterior capsulotomy in connection to cataract surgery and IOL implantation. The cuts are applied by means of the VICTUS femtosecond laser system using a cylindrical cut pattern with diameter and height dependent on anterior chamber depth, pupil diameter and ocular lens size for Group A and the manual surgery technique for Group B.

The allocation of the surgery technique will be randomized between the study patient. Each surgery technique represents a study group. In Group A the anterior capsulotomy and lens fragmentation will be performed by means of femtosecond laser surgery. Group B acts as a control group where the capsulotomy as well as the lens fragmentation is performed manually.

The hypothesis of the study is that by means of intraocular, laser-induced cuts, circularity of the capsulotomy can be improved in a safe and effective way.

A detailed pre-operative examination will ensure that every interested and willing patient fulfils the inclusion criteria of this study. Post-operative examinations, which should document the success of the treatment, are to be carried out after 1-day, 1-week, 1-month.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Consenting patients undergoing phacoemulsification and IOL implant surgery for cataract, the diagnosis of which has been confirmed by another investigator.
  • Clear cornea media
  • Pupil must be able to dilate to at least 6mm in diameter measured with the pupil gauge

Exclusion criteria

  • Pre-existing posterior capsule rupture Difference between maximum and minimum K-values must not be more than 5 D. The maximum K- value may not exceed 60 D and the minimal value may not be smaller than 37 D.
  • Corneal disease or pathology that precludes transmission of laser wavelength or distortion of laser light.
  • Subjects with a poorly dilating pupil or other defect of the pupil that prevents the iris from adequate retraction peripherally.
  • Lens/zonular instability such as, but not restricted to, Marfan's Syndrome, Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome, etc.
  • Previous intraocular or corneal surgery of any kind, including any type of surgery for either refractive or therapeutic purposes in either eye.
  • Patients with disorders of the ocular muscle, such as nystagmus or strabismus Keratoconus
  • ACD < 1.8 mm or ACD > 4.5 mm

Treatment and study plan

Femtosecond Laser (VICTUS™ Femtosecond Laser Platform)

Device

Capsulotomy and pre-fragmentation of the nucleus are performed by the femtosecond laser.

Manual (CCC technique with Utrata forceps)

Device

Capsulorhexis and pre-fragmentation are performed manually.

Primary outcomes

  1. Circularity of created rhexis

    Time frame: intraoperative

    The primary study end point is to determine if the circularity of the created rhexis is better in Group A as compared to Group B. On the day of surgery immediately after the creation of the rhexis via an recorded surgical video.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diameter of the created rhexis

    Time frame: intraoperative

    The secondary study end point is to determine the diameter of rhexis is more precise and reproducible in Group A as compared to Group B. On the day of surgery immediately after the creation of the rhexis via an recorded surgical video.

Other outcomes

  1. Centration of the created rhexis relative to the pupil

    Time frame: surgery day, 1-Day, 1-week, 1-Month

    The additional outcome is to determine if the centration of the created rhexis relative to the pupil is better in Group A as compared to Group B. On the day of surgery immediately after the creation of the rhexis via an recorded surgical video and postoperative (1-Day, 1-week, 1-Month) based on slit lamp pictures.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH

Industry

Registry information

Acronym: 1118

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Sep 26, 2012
Registry last updated
Jul 1, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.