Maria Cecilia Hospital
Cotignola, Ravenna, 48033, Italy
NCT Number: NCT05805189
Current, worldwide assessments of the prevalence of AF estimate that 33 million people are affected by this cardiac arrhythmia. As the most common sustained atrial arrhythmia, AF has a well-established association with systemic embolic events, stroke, heart failure, and increased mortality. Current treatment guidelines and consensus statements for patients with AF suggest that most patients should be first managed with a pharmaceutical drug therapy; however, when a patient becomes drug refractory (intolerant or non-responsive), catheter ablation by PV isolation (PVI) is recommended.
The aim of PVI is abolishment of all conducted electrical activity beyond the isolating lesions.
The recent NICE guidelines have established that today RF point-by-point ablation is the most cost-effective treatment approach over a lifetime after failure of 1 or more anti-arrhythmic drugs5, but until now a new technology, HELIOSTAR, RF Balloon, has not been included in this cost-effectiveness analysis
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cotignola, Ravenna, 48033, Italy
The multi-electrode RF Balloon catheter (HELIOSTAR, Biosense Webster) is a compliant Balloon with 10 circularly orientated electrodes bonded to its surface. It has been designed to be used in conjunction with the Carto3 system (Biosense Webster, CA). It is able to deliver RF energy directly forming a continuous circular ablation lesion around the PV ostia. With HELIOSTAR, each individual electrode can sense temperature and can be controlled separately. The electrodes can be used for visualization, stimulation, recording and ablation. The compliance of the Balloon allows conformation to the anatomy of the PVs and therefore maximizing tissue contact. The advantages of the RF Balloon include the ease of use to the operator that is associated with Balloon delivery systems, possibility of single shot PVI with tailored RF energy delivery, potentially shorter procedure times and avoidance of collateral damage to non-PVI structures, due to the capacity to individually select and deselect electrodes during ablation.6,7 To date, retrospective analyzes conducted in the RADIANCE and SHINE studies have shown the pre-ablation indicators of optimal electrode positioning and post-RF indicators associated with better outcomes; specifically, baseline impedance range 90-110 Ohms, impedance variability across ten electrodes ≤20 Ohms, baseline electrode temperature ≤31°C, baseline temperature variability ≤3°C and the post-RF indicators (impedance drop ≥12 Ohm and temperature rise ≥6°C) seem to independently predict a durable PVI. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated prospectively the performance of impedance drop and temperature rise of HELIOSTAR ablation in terms of feasibility, acute PVI and post-procedural outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
The following criteria must be met for subjects to be eligible for inclusion into the study
Exclusion criteria
Subjects who meet any one of the following criteria will be excluded from this clinical study
The settings used during ablation will be for both groups: 15W, unipolar; 5ml/min baseline irrigation, 35ml/min irrigation during inflation/RF application; 55°C target electrode temperature; RF application time 60s for anterior electrodes, 20s for posterior electrodes. The catheter insertion in Pulmonary vein and ablation workflow will be different for two groups.
Time frame: 12 months
The primary objective of this study is PV single shot isolation in acute and at 1-3-6-12 months follow up with stringent monitoring including medical examination (Echo, ECG, and 24h-Holter)..
It will be assessed the time necessary to reach the isolation, the number of erogations, the fluoroscopy dose and any use of contrast medium and they will be compared between the two arms.
Our aim is to demonstrate that, even in the case of equivalent relapse rates during the follow up, the CARTO guided approach allows patients to benefit from a faster and less invasive procedure compared to the fluoroscopy guided method. This occurs because the former doesn't require contrast medium and the fluoroscopy time is notably reduced.
Time frame: 12 months
correlation of biophysical parameters, procedural, and ablation times between two groups. Therefore the following parameters will be collected: Balloonballoon dwelling time, impedance drop, and temperature rise of each RF sessions, rate of bonus and segmental applications, rate of reconnection. One of the endpoint is the recurrence of atrial tachycardia (AT) and AF after the blanking period (3 months), as measured by ECG and 24h-holter. It will be evaluated by the failure-free rate at 12 months post-index procedure in each cohort.
Maria Cecilia Hospital
Other
Prospective Evaluation of Biophysical Parameters as Long-term Predictors of PVI With Multi-Electrode Radiofrequency Catheter: Comparison Between CARTO Guided and Fluoroscopy Guided Approach (MERCY Study)
Acronym: MERCY
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06808217
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT05501873
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Brisbane, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06748157
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06521463
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details