Endoscopic follow-up
ProcedureEndoscopic follow-up by means of regular upper endoscopies and endoscopic ultrasounds
NCT Number: NCT03222635
Aim of this prospective multicenter study is to evaluate the safety of an endoscopic follow-up strategy in patients treated with endoscopic resection (ER) for submucosal or high-risk mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1bN0M0 or HR T1aN0M0 EAC).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Westmead hospital, Sydney, Australia
Traditionally, the risk of lymph node metastasis associated with submucosal EAC was considered too high to offer patients endoscopic follow-up. Only in elderly patients with comorbidity, more often an endoscopic protocol is selected. However, the risk of lymph node metastasis associated with submucosal EAC is mainly based on surgical series. Recently a number of studies, which included patients treated endoscopically, were published indicating that the risk of lymph node metastasis may be much lower than generally assumed (1-5). Therefore, a less invasive and organ preserving approach may not only be an option in the frail and elderly, but for all patients with submucosal EAC's.
Yet, no data exists on the risk of lymph node metastasis in high risk T1a EAC. The risk is assumed to be lower than for EACs invading into the submucosal layer. However, a recent retrospective analysis from our own research group shows that this risk may be higher than previously assumed (6). In this nationwide retrospective study, we analyzed lymph node metastasis rates and EAC related mortality rates concerning patients with high risk T1a, low risk T1b or high risk T1b EAC who received endoscopic treatment. The study was performed in 9 Barrett Expert Centers in the Netherlands (2008-2019). 120 patients were included in the analysis, and results showed the highest lymph node metastasis risk in the high risk T1a patient group.
Aim of this multicenter study is to prospectively evaluate the safety of endoscopic follow-up in patients treated by endoscopic resection for submucosal (T1bN0M0) and high risk mucosal (T1aN0M0) EAC.
High-resolution upper endoscopy with white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging supplemented with an EUS are performed every three months during the first two years after ER. After 1 year, a CT-thorax/abdomen will be performed to check for distant metastasis. During the third and fourth year of follow-up, EUS and upper endoscopy are performed every six months. From the fifth year on, EUS and upper endoscopy are performed annually.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endoscopic follow-up by means of regular upper endoscopies and endoscopic ultrasounds
Time frame: 5 years
Disease specific mortality is decribed as mortality directly linked to the esophageal adenocarcinoma (i.e., metastasized EAC, metastasized disease with a simultaneously primary cancer present and it cannot be ruled out (based on histology) that the metastases are related to the other primary cancer, death due to complications of the endoscopic procedure, death due to complications after surgery or CRT, no clear cause of death in patients who have metastases or untreated local recurrence). If patients are diagnosed with distant metastases, and subsequently die of a non-tumor related cause, patients will still be documented as tumor-related death. Will be measured in number of patients and percentages. Survival analysis using Kaplan Meier will be performed.
Time frame: 5 years
Overall survival of study population (tumor-related + non-tumor-related deaths). Measured in numbers and percentages, survival analysis (KM).
Time frame: 5 years
Confirmed by cytology and/or histology by performing FNA during EUS or biopsies.
Time frame: 5 years
In case a local recurrence is found during FU endoscopy, histopathology have to show if it is recurrent cancer.
Time frame: 5 years
In case a local cancer recurrence is not amendable for endoscopic re-treatment, for example due to extensive disease or fibrosis, a patient will be referred for surgery if possible.
Time frame: 5 years
Primary tumor of distant metastasis should be histopathologically evalueted by taking biopsies.
Time frame: 5 years
Quality of life is assessed by using questionnaires on set time points during the whole study.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Amsterdam UMC
Other
Endoscopic Management of Patients With High Risk T1a and T1b N0M0 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: a Prospective Multicenter Registry.
Acronym: PREFER
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06687603
Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, Barrett Esophagus
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06732388
Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, Barrett Esophagus
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05530343
Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, Barrett Esophagus
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04867590
Barrett Esophagus, Digestive System Diseases
Besançon, France
View Trial Details