Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10326, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT04072328
This study is to compare propofol vs. midazolam with propofol for sedative endoscopy in patients with previous paradoxical reaction to midazolam. Patients who meet eligibility criteria will randomly assigned to propofol group or midazolam with propofol group. Then they will receive a sedative endoscopy with close monitoring. The primary outcome is the prevalence of paradoxical response during endoscopy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeHealthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Propofol will be given 0.5 mg/kg bolus initially, and can be administered additionally after a least 30 secs if necessary.
midazolam with propofol
Time frame: At the end of endoscopy
The proportion of participants who show paradoxical response during endoscopy
DongGuk University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01769586
Endoscopy, Sedation
West Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01934088
Behavior, Digestive System Diseases
Herlev, Region H, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT02062177
Endoscopy, Sedation
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07649746
Colonoscopy, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
View Trial Details