Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01141036

Propofol Versus Midazolam for Upper Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients

Upper GI endoscopy is often performed in patients with chronic liver disease to screen for esophageal and gastric varices. The purpose of this study is to compare propofol to midazolam for sedation in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing diagnostic upper GI endoscopy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ziv medical center liver unit

Safed, Israel, 13100, Israel

About this study

Background : Upper GI endoscopy is often performed in patients with chronic liver disease to screen for esophageal and gastric varices. AIM: The purpose of this study is to compare propofol to midazolam for sedation in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing diagnostic upper GI endoscopy. Methods: 60 outpatients who has known chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh class A or B) (cirrhosis) and are undergoing variceal screening will be randomized to receive propofol or midazolam for sedation. Administration of sedation was performed by a anesthesist. Outcome measures studied are induction and recovery times, efficacy and safety of sedation, patient satisfaction, and return to baseline function and subclinical hepatic encephalopathy (number connection test), and saturation of oxygen. expected results: The mean time to achieve adequate sedation will be shorter for for the propofol group in comparison to midazolam group. The level of sedation achieved by the propofol group will be greater. Time to full recovery will be faster in the propofol group. Propofol do not exacerbate subclinical hepatic encephalopathy as compared to midazolam. patients receiving propofol will express greater overall mean satisfaction with the quality of their sedation at the time of discharge. Conclusions: Propofol sedation is expected not to exacerbate subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotics.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Known chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh class A or B) who presented for upper GI endoscopy for routine variceal screening.
  • The diagnosis of liver disease will be based on available past history, serological testing, radiological imaging, and liver histology when available.
  • Staging of cirrhosis will be determined by MELD score and by Child-Pugh score . All patients will complete a standard preprocedure history and physical examination to establish current degree of encephalopathy and ascites.

Exclusion criteria

  • Exclusion criteria will include the following:
  • known allergy or adverse reaction to sedative or component thereof
  • patients with known significant respiratory disease or airway abnormality)
  • active neurological impairment including clinically detectable hepatic encephalopathy
  • advanced or decompensated liver disease ( CP score >10, MELD >24) (Child-Pugh class C)
  • active alcohol consumption or illicit drug abuse
  • active prescription for sedation or narcotics

Treatment and study plan

Propofol

Drug

Propofol will be initiated with a 30-50 mg i.v. bolus followed by repeated 10-20 mg doses at variable intervals (approximately 15 s, at the discretion of the endoscopist/nurse) until an appropriate level of sedation will be achieved.

midazolam

Drug

Midazolam (0.5-1.0 mg) will be administered in a similar fashion with incremental dosing at intervals of approximately 1-3 min until a level of sedation will be achieved

Primary outcomes

  1. Exacerbation of hepatic encephalopathy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recovery time, time to discharge

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ziv Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jun 10, 2010
Registry last updated
Jun 10, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.