Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06001840

Promotion and Mitigation Factors Leading to Illegal Tobacco Purchases

This study will investigate the effects of promotion factors and mitigation strategies on legal and illegal tobacco purchases for different tobacco-user types.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC

Roanoke, Virginia, 24016, United States

About this study

In the present study, we propose to examine some promotion factors and mitigation strategies and how they impact tobacco product legal and illegal purchases. Specifically, we have developed an Illegal Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (iETM). The iETM permits us to identify the number, type, and characteristics of tobacco users who would seek illegal tobacco products and the conditions that would induce them to seek that option. The critical questions we seek to answer are whether changes in product standards and availability will engender illegal tobacco purchasing as a function of tobacco user type (e.g., exclusive combustible product users, and dual cigarette/NVP users). Understanding the user types and the relevant conditions will inform greater tailoring of policy to diminish consumer interest in an illegal market.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide informed consent
  • Be at least 21 years of age or older
  • Provide a breath sample for measuring carbon monoxide (CO ≥ 8 ppm)
  • Stable tobacco use patterns for at least two months

For exclusive cigarette smokers:

  • Smoke at least 10 cigarettes daily and do not use NVPs regularly (no more than 9 times in the last month).
  • For dual cigarette/NVP users:
  • Smoke at least 10 cigarettes daily and use NVPs at least 3 times in a week (report use of closed nicotine salt system)

Exclusion criteria

  • Have plans to move out of the area
  • Have a serious or unstable physical or mental health condition
  • Taking a tobacco cessation medication or medication that interferes with nicotine metabolism, motivation or reinforcement
  • Report concrete, immediate plans to alter/quit using their usual nicotine products at the beginning of the study
  • Being pregnant or lactating

Treatment and study plan

Promotion factors

Behavioral

In the full nicotine conditions, participants' preferred cigarettes and NVP products will be available in the LETM and preferred cigarettes will be available in the iETM. In the low nicotine conditions, a ban will permit only VLNCs in the LETM and preferred cigarettes will be available in the iETM.

Mitigation strategies

Behavioral

Penalties: Penalties will be presented as a 60% chance of getting caught making illegal purchases. The consequences of illegal purchases include not receiving any study products from the ETM if they were caught and randomly drew that trial.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Budget Spent on Illegal Cigarettes Across Policy Conditions

    Time frame: 1 day

    The study has 4 policy conditions with combinations of promotion strategy (VLNC standard) and mitigation strategy (penalties), and each combination: No Policy, Penalty only, VLNC only, and Penalty + VLNC. The average percentage of the budget spent on illegal cigarettes across all trials was calculated for each policy scenario.

  2. Percent Budget Spent on Legal Cigarettes Across Policy Conditions

    Time frame: 1 day

    The study has 4 policy conditions with combinations of promotion strategy (VLNC standard) and mitigation strategy (penalties), and each combination: No Policy, Penalty only, VLNC only, and Penalty + VLNC. The average percentage of the budget spent on legal cigarettes across all trials was calculated for each policy scenario.

  3. Percent Budget Spent on E-cigarettes Across Policy Conditions

    Time frame: 1 day

    The study has 4 policy conditions with combinations of promotion strategy (VLNC standard) and mitigation strategy (penalties), and each combination: No Policy, Penalty only, VLNC only, and Penalty + VLNC. The average percentage of the budget spent on e-cigarettes across all trials was calculated for each policy scenario.

  4. Percent Budget Spent on Nicotine Replacement Therapy Across Policy Conditions

    Time frame: 1 day

    The study has 4 policy conditions with combinations of promotion strategy (VLNC standard) and mitigation strategy (penalties), and each combination: No Policy, Penalty only, VLNC only, and Penalty + VLNC. The average percentage of the budget spent on nicotine replacement theray across all trials was calculated for each policy scenario.

  5. Percent Budget Spent on Oral Nicotine/Tobacco Across Policy Conditions

    Time frame: 1 day

    The study has 4 policy conditions with combinations of promotion strategy (VLNC standard) and mitigation strategy (penalties), and each combination: No Policy, Penalty only, VLNC only, and Penalty + VLNC. The average percentage of the budget spent on oral nicotine/tobacco across all trials was calculated for each policy scenario.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Other

Collaborators

  • Medical University of South Carolina

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 21, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.