Instituto Dermatológico y Cirugía de Piel (IDCP)
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
NCT Number: NCT06316102
This study includes an adapted multilevel intervention, Abriendo Puertas (Opening Doors), including individual counseling, peer navigation, and community mobilization for transfeminine people living with HIV in the Dominican Republic using an iterative consultation process. Prior to this randomized controlled trial, feasibility and initial effects on HIV care and treatment behaviors were assessed with 30 trans women living with HIV (no control group) and documented positive trends in antiretroviral therapy use (70% to 85%, p=0.03), missed care appointments (35% to 20%, p=0.39) and antiretroviral therapy adherence (86% to 96%, p=0.50). Participants emphasized that trusting intervention staff and being treated with respect in individual sessions allowed them to improve self-esteem. Limited trust and cohesion among trans women, however, inhibited more extensive engagement with peer navigation and community activities. In response, the study team identified two key modifications to strengthen and further tailor the intervention for transfeminine people living with HIV: 1) integrate more gender affirming content, including with providers and 2) focus on building trust among transfeminine people through sequential implementation of individual and then community components. The purpose of the proposed study is to conduct a pilot randomized trial of the Gender-affirming Abriendo Puertas intervention. In Aim 1, the preliminary efficacy of the Gender-affirming Abriendo Puertas intervention on viral suppression among transfeminine people randomized to the intervention compared to those randomized to control will be assessed. The research study will randomly assign transfeminine people living with HIV to the Gender-affirming Abriendo Puertas intervention (n=60) (individual counseling, peer navigation, provider training, and community support building) or control group (n=60). There will be baseline, 6, and 12-month surveys and viral load assessments to assess differences across study arms. In Aim 2, the study team will examine pathways of influence (e.g. decreased stigma, increased cohesion) and experiences with the intervention to identify specific areas for improvement and scale up. Longitudinal qualitative interviews will be conducted at baseline, 6, and 12 months with 20 intervention participants. Together with surveys, the study team will assess how Gender-affirming Abriendo Puertas participation affects pathways between stigma, cohesion, and HIV outcomes. The study team will also elicit experiences and recommendations from providers and intervention staff in focus groups at 6 (n=2) and 12 months (n=2).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Multilevel intervention with 4 components
Time frame: 6 months
For viral load assessments of HIV, a 10 mL tube of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid anti-coagulated blood will be drawn. <400 copies/mL= viral suppression and >=400 copies/mL= no viral suppression.
Time frame: 1 year
For viral load assessments of HIV, a 10 mL tube of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid anti-coagulated blood will be drawn. <400 copies/mL= viral suppression and >=400 copies/mL= no viral suppression.
Time frame: 6 months
Participants who have received HIV care will answer the question: "In the past 6 months, how many HIV appointments have you missed?" Response options are 0 = Retention in HIV care (i.e., Retained) and >0 = No retention in HIV care (i.e., Not Retained).
Time frame: 1 year
Participants who have received HIV care will answer the question: "In the past 6 months, how many HIV appointments have you missed?" Response options are 0 = Retention in HIV care (i.e., Retained) and >0 = No retention in HIV care (i.e., Not Retained).
Time frame: 6 months
Participants currently on antiretroviral therapy will be asked: "During the last 4 days, how many days did you not take your entire antiretroviral therapy dose?" Response options are 0 = No antiretroviral therapy interruption (i.e., Adherent) and >0 = Antiretroviral therapy interruption (i.e., Non-Adherent).
Time frame: 1 year
Participants currently on antiretroviral therapy will be asked: "During the last 4 days, how many days did you not take your entire antiretroviral therapy dose?" Response options are 0 = No antiretroviral therapy interruption (i.e., Adherent) and >0 = Antiretroviral therapy interruption (i.e., Non-Adherent).
Time frame: 6 months
Participants who reported ever having taken antiretroviral therapy will be asked: "In the past 6 months, have you stopped or suspended your antiretrovirals?" Response options are No = No antiretroviral therapy interruption (Adherent) and Yes = Antiretroviral therapy interruption (Non-Adherent).
Time frame: 1 year
Participants on antiretroviral therapy will be asked: "In the past 6 months, have you stopped or suspended your antiretrovirals?" Response options are No = No antiretroviral therapy interruption (Adherent) and Yes = Antiretroviral therapy interruption (Non-Adherent).
Time frame: 6 months
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item screener to assess the frequency of depressed mood/anhedonia over the past two weeks. Participants respond to how often they have been bothered by symptoms, from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Scores range from 0-27, with higher scores suggestive of greater depression. Per protocol 0-9=No depressive symptoms; 10-27=depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 1 year
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item screener to assess the frequency of depressed mood/anhedonia over the past two weeks. Participants respond to how often they have been bothered by symptoms, from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total scores range from 0-27, with higher scores suggestive of greater depression. Per protocol total scores between 0-9=No depressive symptoms; and between 10-27=depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 6 months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-item questionnaire that includes two 7-item subscales assessing anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D), each rated on a 0-3 scale. For this study only HADS-A subscale was used. Raw scores range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating higher anxiety. Per protocol, scores from 0-7 = no anxiety symptoms, scores from 8-21 = anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: 1 year
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-item questionnaire that includes two 7-item subscales assessing anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D), each rated on a 0-3 scale. For this study only HADS-A subscale was used. Raw scores range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating higher anxiety. Per protocol, scores from 0-7 = no anxiety symptoms, scores from 8-21 = anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: 6 months
Participants were asked a series of questions about illicit substance use in the previous 6 months. Options were: Yes = used any type of illicit drug in the previous 6 months and No = did not use any type of illicit drug in the previous 6 months.
Time frame: 1 year
Participants were asked a series of questions about illicit substance use in the previous 6 months. Options were: Yes = used any type of illicit drug in the previous 6 months and No = did not use any type of illicit drug in the previous 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
Participants were asked about binge drinking. Binge drinking was defined per protocol as 6 or more drinks on one occasion. Options were: Yes = consume 6+ drinks on one occasion at least monthly and No = consumes 6+ drinks on one occasion less than once a month.
Time frame: 1 year
Participants were asked about binge drinking. Binge drinking was defined per protocol as 6 or more drinks on one occasion. Options were: Yes = consume 6+ drinks on one occasion at least monthly and No = consumes 6+ drinks on one occasion less than once a month.
Time frame: 6 months
The Rosenberg self-esteem scale is a 10-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' self-esteem. As used in this study, the total scale score range from 0-30, where higher scores indicate greater self-esteem. Response options were: Totally agree = 3, Agree = 2, Disagree = 1, and Totally disagree = 0.
Time frame: 1 year
The Rosenberg self-esteem scale is a 10-item Likert-type scale that assesses participants' self-esteem. As used in this study, the total scale score range from 0-30, where higher scores indicate greater self-esteem. Response options were: Totally agree = 3, Agree = 2, Disagree = 1, and Totally disagree = 0.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Other
Piloting a Multilevel Intervention to Promote Viral Suppression Among Transgender Women Living With HIV in Santo Domingo
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07225894
Behavior, HIV
Kisumu, Kisumu County, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT05080972
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Behavior
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05383755
Behavior, HIV
Kisumu, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT05126225
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Behavior
Yangon, Myanmar, Burma
View Trial Details