Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02934620

Promoting CSD500 Use Among Women in Established Relationships

Globally, women in established relationships remain at risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV. In Vietnam, the location of the proposed research, unmet need for contraception is substantial as reflected in the nation's high abortion ratio. Married women account for about one-third of HIV cases in Vietnam, and among this group, most were exposed to the virus through sexual activity with their husband. Condoms will remain crucial for prevention for some time to come. Sustained condom use, however, is notoriously difficult to achieve. A key barrier to the consistent use of condoms is their effect on sexual pleasure. Although sexual pleasure is a primary motivation for engaging in sex and is an integral part of overall sexual health, most programs to improve sexual health operate within a pregnancy and disease-prevention paradigm. A new condom, CSD500, containing an erectogenic drug was developed for use among healthy couples to improve sexual pleasure by increasing penile firmness, size and erection duration. The overall objective of the proposed two-arm randomized trial is to test whether promoting the novel condom CSD500 for improved sexual pleasure results in couples having less unprotected vaginal sex. Investigators will measure the occurrence of unprotected vaginal sex by testing women's vaginal fluid for the presence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), an objective, biological marker of recent semen exposure. Investigators will randomize 500 adult, heterosexual, monogamous couples, comprised of a total of 1000 individuals, in Thanh Hoa province, Vietnam to receive either CSD500 for sexual pleasure or the standard condom currently provided only for pregnancy and disease prevention to patients during routine care. Study staff will interview female participants at enrollment and after 2, 4, and 6 months and their male partners at the 6-month visit. Study clinicians will sample vaginal fluid from female participants at all visits to test for the presence of PSA.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Thanh Hoa Provincial Centre of Reproductive Health

Thanh Hóa, Thanh Hóa Province, Vietnam

About this study

This randomized controlled trial will test whether promoting the novel condom CSD500 (Futura Medical Developments; Surrey, UK) for improved sexual pleasure results in couples having less unprotected vaginal sex - measured with a biological marker of recent semen exposure - compared to the promotion of a standard condom for disease and pregnancy prevention. CSD500 contains an erectogenic drug and was developed to improve sexual pleasure by increasing penile firmness, size, and erection duration.

Investigators will recruit eligible, monogamous, heterosexual couples at Thanh Hoa Provincial Centre of Reproductive Health in Vietnam to participate in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of two balanced arms of approximately 250 heterosexual couples each, for a total of 500 couples, comprised of 1000 individuals. At enrollment and at three follow-up visits scheduled at 2, 4 and 6 months after enrollment, study staff will provide condom counseling, will collect vaginal swabs to test for the semen biomarker, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and will administer a questionnaire to the female participants on their demographics, sexual and condom-related attitudes and practices, including sexual pleasure and perceptions of partner's sexual pleasure. Although the intervention is directed to the women, couples will be enrolled to ensure that the male partners consent to CSD500 use. After enrollment, male participants will not participate in study visit activities, including data collection, until the time of their female partner's final 6-month visit. Because of the differences in counseling messages, participants and study staff at the site cannot be blinded to arm assignment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(for women):

  • Not currently using a modern contraceptive method other than condoms or intending to start using a modern contraceptive method other than condoms in the next 6 months;
  • Willing to use assigned study condoms as the sole method of contraception for the next six months;
  • Not breastfeeding;
  • Not known to be pregnant;
  • Want to avoid pregnancy for at least the next six months; and
  • Be in a monogamous relationship for at least the past six months with her current male partner.

Exclusion criteria

(for couples):

Couples are ineligible for study participation if either person in the couple is known to be HIV-positive or has any of the following contraindications to CSD500 use:

  • History of low blood pressure or heart condition;
  • Current use of medication for anemia, blood pressure, erectile dysfunction, migraines, headaches or glaucoma;
  • Inflamed or broken skin that the condom could come into contact with; or
  • Latex allergy or sensitivity.

Treatment and study plan

CSD500 Condom

Device

CSD500 is a commercial condom that complies fully with the requirements of ISO 4074, the international standard for male latex condoms. The product is designed to increase sexual pleasure.

Other names: Blue Diamond

Standard Condom

Device

The standard condom is a standard condom in Vietnam at the time of the study. It is provided for pregnancy and disease prevention.

Condom Counseling

Behavioral

The intervention arm will receive counseling that briefly addresses condom's dual protection against pregnancy and HIV/STI but that otherwise emphasizes the potential for increased sexual pleasure with CSD500 use. Counseling to this arm also will include CSD500-specific instructions, such as the need to briefly massage the gel inside the condom teat onto the penis head after donning the condom and to not use multiple condoms within a 24-hour period. The control arm will receive standard counseling to use condoms for pregnancy and disease prevention without receiving any messages about the use of condoms for sexual pleasure.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Female Participants With Positive PSA at 2-Month Visit

    Time frame: Vaginal swab collected at 2-month follow-up visit

    A double-headed vaginal swab is collected for each female participant to assess for PSA positivity.

  2. Number of Female Participants With Positive PSA at 4-Month Visit

    Time frame: Vaginal swab collected at 4-month follow-up visit

    A double-headed vaginal swab is collected for each female participant to assess for PSA positivity.

  3. Number of Female Participants With Positive PSA at 6-Month Visit

    Time frame: Vaginal swab collected at 6-month follow-up visit

    A double-headed vaginal swab is collected for each female participant to assess for PSA positivity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Female Participants With Self-reported Condomless Sex at 2-month Follow-up Visit

    Time frame: Measured at 2-month follow-up visit

    Investigators will compare frequency of self-reports of recent sex without a condom between the two arms of female participants.

  2. Quality of Sexual Experience (QSE) Scale Scores Among Participants at 6-month Visit

    Time frame: Measured among participants at at 6-month follow-up visit

    The Quality of Sexual Experience Scale was modified to add a question about pleasure related to the act's duration. The scale will be used to evaluate the effects of CSD500 provision on women and men's reports of sexual pleasure compared to the standard condom. The scale ranges from 0-7 points with a higher score indicating a higher-quality experience.

  3. Quality of Sexual Experience (QSE) Scale Scores Among Female Participants at 2-month Visit

    Time frame: Measured among female participants at at 2-month follow-up visit

    The Quality of Sexual Experience Scale was modified to add a question about pleasure related to the act's duration. The scale will be used to evaluate the effects of CSD500 provision on women's reports of sexual pleasure compared to the standard condom. The scale ranges from 0-7 points with a higher score indicating a higher-quality experience.

  4. Quality of Sexual Experience (QSE) Scale Scores Among Female Participants at 4-month Visit

    Time frame: Measured among female participants at at 4-month follow-up visit

    The Quality of Sexual Experience Scale was modified to add a question about pleasure related to the act's duration. The scale will be used to evaluate the effects of CSD500 provision on women's reports of sexual pleasure compared to the standard condom. The scale ranges from 0-7 points with a higher score indicating a higher-quality experience.

  5. Number of Female Participants With Self-reported Condomless Sex at 4-month Follow-up Visit

    Time frame: Measured at 4-month follow-up visit

    Investigators will compare frequency of self-reports of recent sex without a condom between the two arms of female participants.

  6. Number of Female Participants With Self-reported Condomless Sex at 6-month Follow-up Visit

    Time frame: Measured at 6-month follow-up visit

    Investigators will compare frequency of self-reports of recent sex without a condom between the two arms of female participants.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University

Other

Collaborators

  • Ministry of Health, Vietnam
  • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Oct 17, 2016
Registry last updated
Dec 13, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.