SUS
Lund, Skåne County, 221 00, Sweden
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06322264
The goal of this explorative observational study is to map the procedure and child centered approach in the examination for children that undergo conventional X-ray examinations. The main questions aim to answer:
* How many images need to be retaken during conventional X-ray examinations? * What is the reason why the pictures need to be redone? * What is the time required for the various examinations? * What experience of the procedure of the examination is there among those involved? * Can the physical impact be observed through variation in heart rate in children that undergo conventional X-ray examinations?
Participants will answer questionnaires about the children's participation in the procedure and the variation in heart rate will be measured on the children who undergo the examinations.
Interested in participating?
Request Info4 year–12 year
All sexes
Observational
Lund, Skåne County, 221 00, Sweden
Location status: Recruiting
Many children receive healthcare services during their childhood. In Sweden, approximately 330,000 children aged 0-15 require conventional X-ray examinations annually. It is imperative that the justification for conducting these X-ray examinations on children is carefully considered. Improper positioning during the image capturing process can result in inadequate images that do not provide necessary diagnostic information. This may require that the X-ray procedure must be repeated, leading to unnecessary exposure of children to radiation. This situation poses complexities as a means to minimize the occurrence of repeated imaging procedures and minimize unnecessary radiation exposure, children may be subject to some level of restraint.
Effective January 1, 2020, Sweden adopted the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child into law, with the aim of enhancing and elucidating the rights of children.
This entails that children are entitled to receive care from personnel who possess the expertise and qualifications necessary to uphold both the physical and mental well-being of children, as well as their rights, prior to, during, and following a procedure such as an X-ray examination.
The radiographer plays a significant role in determining the outcome of pediatric examinations, impacting both the child's experience and the quality of imaging as well as the radiation dose received. This study investigates the perceptions of health care professionals regarding pediatric examinations, focusing on procedure, child centered approach, and overall experience during conventional X-ray procedures. Additionally, it explores the experiences of children and their parents during examinations, including children's level of participation in the process. It is also essential to evaluate the physical indicators, this in the form of changes in the child's pulse rate.
To establish a standard baseline for normal variation, investigators will measure pulse rates before, during, and after an examination using portable heart rate monitors.
The questionnaires will be answered by the population -children, parents and the examining radiographer after each examination has been completed and will mainly consist of shorter multiple-choice options with the possibility of extended answers in cases where additions need to be made.
For the parts that are common between the three groups, the questions to the children are taken from a questionnaire about children's participation. Parents and radiographers receive the same questions and answers on a Likert scale.
A descriptive and comparative analysis will be done with the support of different software, Excel and SPSS.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The children will be given a portable device that will monitor their heart rate, enabling the recording of the rate of their pulse.
Time frame: The measurement is done through the examination total time 15 minutes (baseline before start 1-2 minutes, start of exam 2-10 minutes, end of exam after 10-15 minutes)
To compare the variations in pulse with the experience of the examination
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Camilla Viseu, MMedSci
CONTACT
Carina Sjöberg, Phd
CONTACT
Lund University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07404956
Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Pain (AP)
Bartın, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05273801
Exercise Therapy, Heart Rate Determination
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07669168
Activities of Daily Living, Aging
Boulder, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06722352
Alzheimer Disease, Behavior
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial Details