Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT06061328

Project OASIS: Optimizing Approaches to Select Implementation Strategies

Barriers that prevent healthcare methods supported by science from being adopted in the real world have led to low-quality, inequitable medical care. Implementation science aims to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap but still lacks simple and convenient methods to identify implementation barriers, systematically track which strategies work to improve care, and provide accessible data and expert recommendations to guide implementation strategy selection for use in research and practice. Project OASIS (Optimizing Approaches to Select Implementation Strategies) will conduct a hybrid type-III, cluster-randomized trial of a new decision aid tool that matches site variables and barriers to successful implementation strategies.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15240, United States

About this study

Implementation science aims to improve the uptake of evidence-based health care practices (EBPs) by defining barriers that prevent their use, offering strategies to overcome these barriers, and developing methods that help clinicians and researchers choose strategies that best address the barriers they encounter. With strategy selection often being inefficient and idiosyncratic, experts have called for methods to make strategy selection scientific, data-driven, and "precise." This "precision implementation" causes a critical need to identify implementation barriers and facilitators quickly and uniformly, track implementation strategy use and effectiveness, and incorporate data and expert knowledge into the process of matching strategies to barriers. Without these improvements, there is a risk of perpetuating implementation failures and health care disparities.

Project OASIS (Optimizing Approaches to Select Implementation Strategies) will conduct a cluster-randomized, hybrid type III trial to compare a machine learning derived decision aid (DA) for selecting implementation strategies with a current expert opinion-based tool in 20 VA medical centers. The investigators will apply the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluative framework and assess rates of hepatocellular carcinoma screening (an EBP) for Veterans with cirrhosis at these sites. As this is a facility-level intervention, Veterans with cirrhosis will be cluster randomized to the DA vs. Current Tool arms. The investigators anticipate that Veterans at sites in the DA arm will be significantly more likely to receive screening than Veterans at sites in the Current Tool arm.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Veterans:

  • Veterans with two outpatient or one inpatient codes for cirrhosis or its complications who had an encounter in the prior 18 months at a participating VA medical center

VA clinicians:

  • Physicians, advance practice providers, nurses, leadership, and staff engaged with selecting and applying implementation strategies to improve care at a participating VA medical center

Exclusion criteria

  • Veterans post-transplant or with active hepatocellular carcinoma

Treatment and study plan

OASIS DA training

Behavioral

The OASIS decision aid is a novel implementation strategy selection tool developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts using machine learning algorithms and user-centered design approaches.

Current DA Tool training

Behavioral

The CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool is a currently available decision aid tool for selecting implementation strategies that is based on expert opinion.

Primary outcomes

  1. Reach as assessed by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening rates

    Time frame: measured quarterly 1 year pre-intervention through 6 months post-intervention

    Reach of an intervention refers to the absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are willing to participate in a given intervention. The reach outcome will be the percentage of active VA patients with a diagnosis of cirrhosis receiving guideline-concordant abdominal imaging every 6 months.

  2. Effectiveness as assessed by patient outcomes

    Time frame: measured quarterly 1 year pre-intervention through 6 months post-intervention

    Effectiveness is the impact of an intervention on important individual outcomes. Patient outcomes such as cancers detected and linkage to curative treatment will be used to assess effectiveness.

  3. Adoption as assessed by % improvement in HCC screening performance

    Time frame: measured quarterly 1 year pre-intervention through 6 months post-intervention

    Adoption is the absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of settings/people who are willing to initiate a program. The investigators will assess adoption by the percent improvement in screening performance at intervention sites from pre- to post-intervention.

  4. Implementation as assessed by fidelity to HCC screening recommendations

    Time frame: measured quarterly 1 year pre-intervention through 6 months post-intervention

    Implementation is the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended. The investigators will assess implementation by the proportion of patients at an intervention site receiving all hepatocellular carcinoma screening as recommended (correct timing and modality).

  5. Maintenance as assessed by maintenance of other measures

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention

    Maintenance is the extent to which a program becomes part of routine organizational practices. The investigators will assess maintenance by sustainment of all above outcomes at 6 months post-intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks, 6 months post-intervention

    Acceptability refers to a given innovation being perceived as agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory by implementation stakeholders. The AIM is a 4-item measure scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

  2. Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks, 6 months post-intervention

    Appropriateness is the perceived fit of an innovation to address a particular issue or problem. The IAM is a 4-item measure on a 5-point Likert scale.

  3. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks, 6 months post-intervention

    Feasibility refers to the extent to which an innovation can be successfully used within a given setting. The FIM is a 4-item measure on a 5-point Likert scale.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Fed

Collaborators

  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System

Registry information

Acronym: OASIS

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 29, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.