Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03371940

Program ACTIVE II: Behavioral Depression Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes

Program ACTIVE II is a depression treatment study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, Indiana University, Ohio University and West Virginia University. The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of two forms of treatment for depression for adults with type 2 diabetes: talk therapy (counseling) and exercise. Both of these forms of treatment have been proven to be effective in helping people with depression alone. In this study, the investigators will test to see if both of these approaches may be more effective in helping people live depression-free compared to talk therapy, exercise or usual care alone.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Program ACTIVE II is a study funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18DK092765) designed to test the combined effectiveness of two behavioral treatments for depression in people with type 2 diabetes: individual counseling (cognitive behavioral therapy; CBT) and exercise. While each of these treatment approaches has been tested individually in people with depression, no study has tested the combination of these approaches for people with major depression and type 2 diabetes. These approaches have the potential to work synergistically as a win-win strategy to improve both T2DM and depression outcomes while extending the reach of formal health care treatment strategies for diabetes.

Two primary study aims will be addressed by Program ACTIVE II: 1) to compare changes in glycemic control across intervention groups to UC at POST and 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments; and 2) to compare changes in MDD outcomes across intervention groups (i.e. CBT, EXER, CBT+EXER) to usual care (UC) following intervention (POST) and 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments.

The primary hypotheses are:

  • Diabetes Outcomes. Based on the investigators' pilot data, mean glycemic control (as measured by HbA1c) is expected to improve .4% in participants in the EXER and CBT+EXER treatment conditions at POST compared to baseline [de Groot et al 2009]. Participants assigned to the CBT+EXER treatment are expected to show the greatest improvement in HbA1c followed by those in the EXER group in comparison to the CBT group. No improvement is expected among those assigned to the UC condition.
  • Depression. Participants in the CBT, EXER and CBT+EXER conditions will show clinically significant improvements in BDI and diagnosis of MDD at POST and 6- and 12-month assessments with the greatest improvements expected among those in CBT+EXER condition. Based on pilot data, a) 66% reduction in the number of people who meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD is expected at POST compared to baseline; b) 86-90% percent of cases with MDD remission at POST are expected to remain remitted at the 6-month follow-up; c) severity of depression, as measured by the BDI-II, will significantly decrease from baseline to POST and baseline to follow-up assessments, after co-varying the effect of gender, number of T2DM complications, and exposure to treatment. It is anticipated that participants in the CBT+EXER condition will show the longest remission rates of depression followed by those in EXER and CBT.

The secondary hypotheses are:

  • Changes in CVD risk factors in the intervention groups compared to UC over time. Physical activity capacity, as measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), will demonstrate the greatest improvements in the CBT+EXER arm, closely followed by the EXER arm at follow-up assessment compared to baseline. Participants in the CBT and UC arms are not expected to show significant improvements. LDL-C is expected to improve at POST in the EXER and CBT+EXER conditions consistent with pilot data.
  • Cost Effectiveness Analyses. The predicted incidence of complications, particularly coronary heart disease (CHD), will be lower among those who receive CBT+EXER condition compared to the CBT, EXER and UC conditions. Further, the costs of this intensive intervention will be offset by a decrease in complication incidence.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • able to walk without the use of a cane or walker
  • diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for at least one year duration or longer
  • major depression lasting two weeks or longer

Exclusion criteria

  • history of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)
  • history of continuous insulin therapy since diabetes diagnosis
  • stage 2 hypertension as defined by JNC VII
  • recent cardiac events (e.g., unstable angina, diagnosed angina, PTCA, any cardiac intervention for CAD or tachydysrhythmias in the past six months)
  • laser surgery for proliferative retinopathy in the past six months
  • history of stroke, lower limb amputation, asensory peripheral neuropathy, aortic stenosis or other sever valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, severe COPD (e.g., basal oxygen), class III or IV heart failure
  • active suicidal ideation or history of suicide attempt
  • history of bipolar disorder
  • history of psychotic disorder
  • current substance abuse or dependence disorder
  • individuals who report the use of a current antidepressant medication for five weeks or less were excluded or deferred for later screening after the 6 week period
  • individual who were receiving psychotherapy from a mental health provider for depression were excluded

Treatment and study plan

Program ACTIVE Exercise

Behavioral

Please see the Exercise arm description above.

Program ACTIVE CBT

Behavioral

Please see the Talk Therapy arm description above.

Program ACTIVE

Behavioral

Please see the Talk Therapy + Exercise arm description above.

Usual Care - No intervention

Behavioral

Please see the Usual Care arm description above.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in HbA1c

    Time frame: following completion of intervention (POST; ~3 months)

    Based on our pilot data, mean glycemic control (as measured by HbA1c) is expected to improve .4% in participants in the EXER and CBT + EXER treatment conditions at POST (~3 month) compared to baseline (de Groot et al., 2009).

  2. Change in Depression Status - Beck Depression Inventory

    Time frame: following completion of intervention (POST; ~3 months)

    The BDI total score is a sum of 21 items (score range 0 - 63) with higher scores indicating greater depression symptomatology. We calculated change scores from baseline to POST (~3 months). Negative values indicate improvements in depression symptoms. Positive values indicate worsened depression symptoms.

  3. Change in Depression Status - Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder

    Time frame: following completion of intervention (POST; ~3 months)

    Data presented below is the proportion of participants in each treatment arm that achieved partial or full remission from MDD at POST (~3 months) intervention per the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Activity Capacity as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Time frame: following completion of intervention (POST; ~3 months)

    Physical activity capacity as measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT, measured in feel walked)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Indiana University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  • Ohio University
  • University of Michigan
  • West Virginia University

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2017
First posted
Dec 13, 2017
Registry last updated
May 28, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.