EHR-Based Intervention A
BehavioralIntervention A will be a prompt for clinicians to document an estimated prognosis for patients at 6 months, and an assessment of predicted functional outcome if expected to survive.
Other names: Prognostication
NCT Number: NCT03139838
This is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial testing the real-world effectiveness of two different electronic health record (EHR) behavioral interventions in improving a number of patient- and family-centered processes and outcomes of care among seriously ill hospitalized patients. The investigators hypothesize that outcomes can be improved without raising costs by requiring intensive care unit clinicians to (i) document a prognostic estimate and (ii) provide a justification if they choose not to offer patients the option of comfort-oriented care. To test this hypothesis the investigators will conduct a 33-month trial at 17 intensive care units in 10 hospitals using the same Cerner EHR within Atrium Health System.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Carolinas HealthCare System Stanly, Albemarle, North Carolina, United States
The PONDER-ICU trial aims to generate large-scale, experimental evidence regarding the real-world effectiveness of two different electronic health record (EHR) behavioral interventions in improving a number of patient- and family-centered processes and outcomes of care among seriously ill hospitalized patients. The interventions are designed to increase intensive care unit (ICU) physicians' and advanced practitioners' (physician assistants and nurse practitioners) engagement of critically ill patients and caregivers in discussions about alternative treatment options, including care focused on comfort. To achieve this goal, the investigators will conduct a 33-month pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial at 17 ICUs within 10 Atrium Health System hospitals. The investigators hypothesize that outcomes can be improved without raising costs by requiring ICU clinicians to (i) document a prognostic estimate (Intervention A) and (ii) provide a justification if they choose not to offer patients the option of comfort-oriented care (Intervention B). Approximately 4,750 adult patients (1) with chronic life-limiting illness and receiving continuous mechanical ventilation for ≥48 hours will be enrolled. Participating hospitals will be randomized into 5 clusters of 2 hospitals each. Each hospital will first contribute a minimum of 5 months of data collection during usual care in a control phase. Then, using the step-wedge design, all hospitals will implement the two EHR-based interventions. The order in which the interventions will be adopted and the timing of adoption at each hospital will both be determined by random assignment. After 12 months of utilizing Intervention A or Intervention B, each hospital will adopt and implement the second intervention in combination with the other. By the end of the trial, all hospitals will have utilized the combined interventions for at least 4 months. The primary outcome is a composite measure of hospital length of stay and mortality. Secondary outcomes include an array of clinical outcomes, as well as palliative care-related process measures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intervention A will be a prompt for clinicians to document an estimated prognosis for patients at 6 months, and an assessment of predicted functional outcome if expected to survive.
Other names: Prognostication
Intervention B will entail a prompt for clinicians to provide a reason for not offering patients and their families the alternative of care focused entirely on comfort despite recommendations from critical care professional societies to do so for patients at high risk for death or severely impaired functional recovery.
Other names: Accountable Justification
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
The primary outcome is a composite measure of hospital length-of-stay and mortality that ranks deaths along the length-of-stay distribution
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
Change in documented code status during hospital admission
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
Initiation of additional form of life-support (e.g. surgical feeding tube, dialysis) during hospital admission
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
Receipt of palliative care consult during hospital admission
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
The number of hours from ICU admission to inpatient palliative care consult
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
Palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation during hospital admission
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
CPR prior to death or discharge
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
ICU mortality
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
ICU length of stay (hours)
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
Readmission to an ICU within the same hospitalization
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
Hours of mechanical ventilation during hospital admission
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
The number of hours from trial enrollment to time that comfort-care order is placed
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days
Hospital discharge disposition to home, hospice, long-term acute care, nursing facility, or rehabilitation
Time frame: 48-72 hours following an in-hospital death
Nurse-reported postmortem rating of a patient's dying experience
Time frame: 30 days
30-day hospital readmission
Time frame: 30 days
30-day hospital readmission
Time frame: 30 days
30-day hospital readmission
Time frame: 30 days
Mortality rate at 30 days
Time frame: 90 days
Mortality rate at 90 days
Time frame: 180 days
Mortality rate at 180 days
Time frame: 180 days
Hospital free days within 180 days
University of Pennsylvania
Other
Behavioral Economic Approaches to Improve Palliative Care for Critically Ill Patients
Acronym: PONDER-ICU
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03284359
Behavior, Critical Illness
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04612348
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03195127
Chronic Disease, Critical Illness
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07020637
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial Details