Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03139838

Prognosticating Outcomes and Nudging Decisions With Electronic Records in the ICU Trial

This is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial testing the real-world effectiveness of two different electronic health record (EHR) behavioral interventions in improving a number of patient- and family-centered processes and outcomes of care among seriously ill hospitalized patients. The investigators hypothesize that outcomes can be improved without raising costs by requiring intensive care unit clinicians to (i) document a prognostic estimate and (ii) provide a justification if they choose not to offer patients the option of comfort-oriented care. To test this hypothesis the investigators will conduct a 33-month trial at 17 intensive care units in 10 hospitals using the same Cerner EHR within Atrium Health System.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Carolinas HealthCare System Stanly, Albemarle, North Carolina, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The PONDER-ICU trial aims to generate large-scale, experimental evidence regarding the real-world effectiveness of two different electronic health record (EHR) behavioral interventions in improving a number of patient- and family-centered processes and outcomes of care among seriously ill hospitalized patients. The interventions are designed to increase intensive care unit (ICU) physicians' and advanced practitioners' (physician assistants and nurse practitioners) engagement of critically ill patients and caregivers in discussions about alternative treatment options, including care focused on comfort. To achieve this goal, the investigators will conduct a 33-month pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial at 17 ICUs within 10 Atrium Health System hospitals. The investigators hypothesize that outcomes can be improved without raising costs by requiring ICU clinicians to (i) document a prognostic estimate (Intervention A) and (ii) provide a justification if they choose not to offer patients the option of comfort-oriented care (Intervention B). Approximately 4,750 adult patients (1) with chronic life-limiting illness and receiving continuous mechanical ventilation for ≥48 hours will be enrolled. Participating hospitals will be randomized into 5 clusters of 2 hospitals each. Each hospital will first contribute a minimum of 5 months of data collection during usual care in a control phase. Then, using the step-wedge design, all hospitals will implement the two EHR-based interventions. The order in which the interventions will be adopted and the timing of adoption at each hospital will both be determined by random assignment. After 12 months of utilizing Intervention A or Intervention B, each hospital will adopt and implement the second intervention in combination with the other. By the end of the trial, all hospitals will have utilized the combined interventions for at least 4 months. The primary outcome is a composite measure of hospital length of stay and mortality. Secondary outcomes include an array of clinical outcomes, as well as palliative care-related process measures.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years old; AND
  • Admitted to 1 of the 17 participating ICUs; AND
  • Receipt of continuous mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 hours (without interruption); AND
  • ≥ 1 life-limiting illness present on admission (ICD-9/10 code or discrete medical history data from EHR in prior 12 months):
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Cirrhosis
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Dementia (all types)
  • End-stage renal disease
  • Hematologic malignancy
  • Metastatic malignancy
  • Motor neuron disease
  • Pulmonary fibrosis
  • Solid organ malignancy

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients younger than 18 years old are excluded.

Treatment and study plan

EHR-Based Intervention A

Behavioral

Intervention A will be a prompt for clinicians to document an estimated prognosis for patients at 6 months, and an assessment of predicted functional outcome if expected to survive.

Other names: Prognostication

EHR-Based Intervention B

Behavioral

Intervention B will entail a prompt for clinicians to provide a reason for not offering patients and their families the alternative of care focused entirely on comfort despite recommendations from critical care professional societies to do so for patients at high risk for death or severely impaired functional recovery.

Other names: Accountable Justification

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Measure: Length of Stay and In-Hospital Mortality

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    The primary outcome is a composite measure of hospital length-of-stay and mortality that ranks deaths along the length-of-stay distribution

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in code status

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    Change in documented code status during hospital admission

  2. Initiation of additional forms of life-support

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    Initiation of additional form of life-support (e.g. surgical feeding tube, dialysis) during hospital admission

  3. Palliative care consult

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    Receipt of palliative care consult during hospital admission

  4. Time to palliative care consult

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    The number of hours from ICU admission to inpatient palliative care consult

  5. Palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    Palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation during hospital admission

  6. Receipt of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    CPR prior to death or discharge

  7. ICU mortality

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    ICU mortality

  8. ICU length of stay

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    ICU length of stay (hours)

  9. ICU readmission

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    Readmission to an ICU within the same hospitalization

  10. Duration of mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    Hours of mechanical ventilation during hospital admission

  11. Time to withdrawal of life-support

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    The number of hours from trial enrollment to time that comfort-care order is placed

  12. Hospital discharge disposition

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 16 days

    Hospital discharge disposition to home, hospice, long-term acute care, nursing facility, or rehabilitation

  13. Quality of Dying & Death (1-item)

    Time frame: 48-72 hours following an in-hospital death

    Nurse-reported postmortem rating of a patient's dying experience

  14. 30-day hospital readmission

    Time frame: 30 days

    30-day hospital readmission

  15. 90-day hospital readmission

    Time frame: 30 days

    30-day hospital readmission

  16. 180-day hospital readmission

    Time frame: 30 days

    30-day hospital readmission

  17. 30-day mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

    Mortality rate at 30 days

  18. 90-day mortality

    Time frame: 90 days

    Mortality rate at 90 days

  19. 180-day mortality

    Time frame: 180 days

    Mortality rate at 180 days

  20. Hospital free days

    Time frame: 180 days

    Hospital free days within 180 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania

Other

Collaborators

  • Donaghue Medical Research Foundation
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Registry information

Official study title

Behavioral Economic Approaches to Improve Palliative Care for Critically Ill Patients

Acronym: PONDER-ICU

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
May 4, 2017
Registry last updated
Aug 8, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.