Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02886754

Proficiency-Based Progression Training for Clinical Communication

Importance: Clinical communication is an important source of medical error and preventable adverse events.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of proficiency-based progression (PBP) simulation training for ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication in the deteriorating patient.

Setting: The study will be conducted in University College Cork, Ireland. Participants: Third year undergraduate nursing and fifth year medical students, who are scheduled to undertake ISBAR training as part of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) programme.

Intervention: Participants will be prospectively randomized to one of three groups before undertaking a performance assessment of an ISBAR communication relevant to a deteriorating patient in a high fidelity simulation laboratory: HSE group (the national e-learning programme only); S group (national e- learning plus simulation training) and PBP group (national e-learning plus proficiency-based progression simulation).

Main outcome and measures: A proficiency benchmark on the performance of ISBAR communication in the context of an acutely deteriorating patient.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University College Cork

Cork, T12EH31, Ireland

About this study

The first successful simulation validation study used a proficiency-based progression methodology. Since then the approach has been successfully deployed to produce superior technical skills but has not yet been validated for non-technical (communication) skills. The ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) has been selected as the standardised tool for clinical communication in relation to an acutely deteriorating patient in many healthcare organisations worldwide, including Ireland.

The aim of this study is to explore whether proficiency-based progression (PBP) could be applied to simulation-based training for ISBAR performance to produce a superior skill set.

The study will compare performance outcomes of students, who receive the national e-learning programme only with those who receive it in combination with either standard simulation or proficiency-based progression (PBP) simulation.

Participants will be prospectively randomized to one of three training groups within their professional cohort (medicine or nursing) before undertaking a performance assessment of an ISBAR communication relevant to a deteriorating patient in a high fidelity simulation laboratory:

  • Online learning only (HSE) -the national e-learning programme only
  • Standard simulation (S) -online learning plus simulation training
  • Proficiency based progression (PBP) -online learning plus proficiency-based progression simulation.

Main outcome and measures: A proficiency benchmark on the performance of ISBAR communication in the context of an acutely deteriorating patient.

All participants will be required to demonstrate a certificate of successful completion on the national e-learning programme within the previous 4 weeks as well as supplying baseline demographic information before undertaking the training.

Performance metrics have previously been identified, operationally defined and agreed upon at a modified Delphi panel meeting consisting of medical and nursing experts for a series of paper-based simulation cases and a standardised high fidelity simulation case used as the assessment case. The proficiency benchmark for each case has been set based on the performance of experienced nursing and medical personnel on each case as a series of steps, errors and critical errors.

Outcome assessment will be scored by reviewing recordings of ISBAR performance by each participant on the standardised case in the high fidelity laboratory.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Third year undergraduate nursing students

Fifth year medical students

Exclusion criteria

Lack of consent

Failure to successfully complete the National e-learning NEWS programme

Treatment and study plan

Proficiency-based progression

Behavioral

Use of validated metrics and performance benchmarks to simulation training

Other names: PBP

National e-learning programme only

Behavioral

National e-learning programme (COMPASS)

Other names: HSE

Standard simulation

Behavioral

Paper based simulation cases

Other names: Simulation S

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of those reaching the benchmark on the assessment case

    Time frame: 6 months

    Independent review by two blinded assessors of recorded ISBAR phone call conducted in the high fidelity simulation setting

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of completed steps

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of successfully completed steps as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case

Other outcomes

  1. Number of total errors

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of total errors as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case

  2. Number of errors/critical errors

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of errors/critical errors as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University College Cork

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of a Proficiency Based Progression Training Programme for Clinical Communication on ISBAR Performance

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Sep 1, 2016
Registry last updated
Jul 25, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.