Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04174040

Process Model of Emotion Regulation Integrated Musical Rhythm Interventions' Effects on Student Nurses' Anger

Aim: The study aims to determine the effect of the anger management program to be implemented by integrating the rhythm component of music with the Gross Process Model of Emotion Regulation on the anger expression and anger types of nursing students determined to be under risk through screenings.

Materials and Methods: This single-blind factorial designed randomized experimental research was conducted with three control groups. The study group consisted of third-grade students (N=67) who were determined to have scores above average from The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). The study data were collected with pre-post tests and follow-up measurements using STAXI. The experimental interventions were completed in five sessions after pilot study with a specialist. The data were analyzed using one-way and two-way variance analyses (4x3 Factorial ANOVA). Effect size was measured with ε^2.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

20 year–24 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ege University Faculty of Nursing

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Introduction: Nursing students' anger regulation functionally has increasingly gained importance. It is known that cognitive behavioral approaches and music can be used as effective tools for young adults. It is important that the rhythm component of music be integrated with the Gross Model of Emotion Regulation, which analyzes the emotional regulation processes on a cognitive-behavioral basis, and new interventional tools be developed, which can be regularly and easily accessed in psychiatric nursing. The study results will shed light on future studies in terms of using the Gross Model, integrated in musical rhythm studies, to manage functional anger in student nurses.

Aim: The study aims to determine the effect of the anger management program to be implemented by integrating the rhythm component of music with the Gross Model of Emotion Regulation on the anger expression and anger types of nursing students determined to be under risk through screenings.

Materials and Methods: This single-blind factorial designed randomized experimental research was conducted with three control groups. The study group consisted of third-grade students (N=67) who were enrolled in Ege University Faculty of Nursing and determined to have scores above average from The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). The study data were collected from 38 students who met the inclusion criteria. They were collected with pre-post tests and follow-up measurements using STAXI and introductory information form developed in light of the literature. The Gross Model of Emotion Regulation intervention program, integrated with musical rhythms, was completed in five sessions after pilot study. The sessions in the musical rhythms were carried out in company with a specialist. The data were analyzed using one-way and two-way variance analyses (4x3 Factorial ANOVA). The statistical significance level was measured with p˂0.05, and effect size was measured with ε^2. Ethical permissions were obtained to conduct the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • To be a third year student in the Faculty of Nursing
  • To have a higher score than the average limits calculated according to the State Anger score to be obtained from all students,
  • Willingness and volunteering for a musical practice

Exclusion criteria

  • To benefit from regular psychological counseling in the last three months,
  • To have a professional music education,
  • To have a physical handicap that will affect musical sense and skill.

Treatment and study plan

Gross's Process of Emotion Regulation Model Interventions

Behavioral

Interventions were based on Gross's Process Model which include the basis concepts of cognitive-behavioral therapy and carried on with five semi-structured sessions. Cognitive-behavioral theories accept the existence of a thought process (attention-perception-interpretation) that appears in the mind about the event just before the anger emerges. Therefore, anger studies with cognitive-behavioral approach generally proceed with the steps of gaining awareness about this concealed thought, identifying behavioral response and avoidance attitudes and thus regulating emotion. It consists of five 90-minute group sessions structured in this context. While being an accredited cognitive behavioral therapist, investigator have qualified to manage these approach.

The effectiveness of these semi-structured sessions were evaluated by using:

  • Pretest application of STAXI
  • Taking feedback after each intervention session
  • Posttest application of STAXI
  • Follow-up test application of STAXI

Musical Rhythm Interventions

Behavioral

This musical group rhythm intervention was continued with 90 minute long five sessions. The students participated in the practice together with a music expert and lead researcher. The lead researcher took on the role of observer in these sessions. Each session was continued with warming, improvisation and targeted semi-structured rhythm practices aiming anger regulation. The effectiveness of these semi-structured sessions were evaluated by using:

  • Pretest application of STAXI
  • Taking feedback after each intervention session
  • Posttest application of STAXI
  • Follow-up test application of STAXI

Musical Rhythm Integrated Gross's Emotion Regulation Process Interventions

Behavioral

The students participated in the practice together with a music expert and lead researcher. The lead researcher ensured the integration of rhythm applications into the Process Model through cognitive-behavioral semi-structured interventions. Five semi-structured 90-minute group sessions were performed. The effectiveness of the experiment was evaluated by using:

  • Pretest application of STAXI
  • Taking feedback after each intervention session
  • Posttest application of STAXI
  • Follow-up test application of STAXI

Primary outcomes

  1. Anger State and Anger Expressions (first evaluation with posttest)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 months

    Anger state and expressions were evaluated with using The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. This scale originally organized by Charles D. Spielberger in 1988. The scale, which evaluated trait anger (10 items) and state anger behavior (24 items), was adapted to Turk society by Özer N. in 1992. This tool was used to diagnose anger severity and behavioral reactions of anger in many national studies in child, adolescent and adult groups. Scale's Trait Anger dimension (anger expressions) were separated in three subscales as 'anger out', 'anger in' and 'anger control' which each includes eight items (subscale total score min:8, max:32). State Anger subscale has 10 items and total score range is between 10-40 points.

  2. Anger State and Anger Expressions (second evaluation with follow up)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 months

    Anger state and expressions were evaluated with using The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ege University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Gross' Process Model of Emotion Regulation Integrated in Musical Rhythm Interventions on Student Nurses' Anger Expressions and States

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Nov 22, 2019
Registry last updated
Nov 22, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.