Kosuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Kartal, 34846, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07293273
This retrospective, single-center study investigates the effects of two different sedation regimens-dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl-propofol-on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension. The study focuses on peri-procedural safety, recovery, and overall tolerability of sedation approaches in this interventional setting.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Observational
Istanbul, Kartal, 34846, Turkey (Türkiye)
Renal sympathetic denervation has emerged as a therapeutic option for patients with resistant hypertension, yet optimal sedation practices remain unclear. Sedation during catheter-based procedures requires a balance between patient comfort, hemodynamic stability, and minimization of respiratory complications. Dexmedetomidine offers sedative and analgesic effects with minimal respiratory depression, whereas fentanyl-propofol provides rapid, effective sedation but may increase the risk of hemodynamic and respiratory instability. This study retrospectively compares the two strategies by examining intraoperative physiological parameters, complication profiles, and post-procedural recovery measures, aiming to generate evidence that can support anesthesiologists in selecting safer and more effective sedation protocols for this high-risk patient population.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: up to 48 hours
The primary outcome is a composite of periprocedural adverse events during or immediately after renal sympathetic denervation, defined as the occurrence of any of the following: respiratory depression (SpO₂ <90% ≥1 min or need for airway/ventilation), arrhythmia requiring treatment, need for vasoactive drugs, increase in serum creatinine (KDIGO criteria), or elevation in AST/ALT (>2× baseline or ULN). Patients will be positive if ≥1 event occurs. Comparative analysis will be performed between sedation with dexmedetomidine (Group D) and fentanyl + propofol (Group P).
Time frame: up to 48 hours
Association between total dexmedetomidine dose (µg/kg) and the occurrence of the composite periprocedural adverse event (yes/no).
Time frame: up to 48 hours
Association between total propofol dose (mg/kg) and the occurrence of the composite periprocedural adverse event (yes/no).
Ebru Girgin Dinc
Other
Impact of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl-Propofol Sedation on Peri- and Postprocedural Outcomes in Renal Sympathetic Denervation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06676553
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT05863416
Agnosia, Analgesia
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT03012984
Agnosia, Analgesia
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03629262
Agnosia, Analgesia
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details