Procalcitonin and Lung Ultrasonography Guided Antibiotherapy in Emergency Departments

Background Community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are one of the most common motivations for emergency department (ED) consultations and stands as the leading cause of inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Besides the side effects, antibiotic overuse alters the microbiome and generates antibiotic resistance. When assessing patients with LRTIs, the challenge for ED physicians is to identify those with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) of bacterial origin, who will most likely benefit from antibiotics. The low diagnostic accuracy of existing tools, as well as the poor adherence of clinicians to test guidance are leading causes of inappropriate antibiotic use.

Several diagnostic tests can assist in identifying patients with LRTI who require antibiotics. Clinical prediction score can refine the probability of CAP. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has a better diagnostic performance than chest X-ray, the historic reference imaging modality to consolidation in ED. LUS is performed quickly at the bedside without radiation. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a host inflammatory biomarker which tends to be higher in bacterial infections. PCT can be used safely to guide antibiotics use, while its impact on prescription is controversial. None of these tools on its own is sufficient to optimize antibiotic prescription, while a combined approach could better guide clinicians.

Rationale The investigators propose to evaluate the use of a decision support tool to guide antibiotics use in the ED as the summative value of LUS with PCT remains unknown in this setting.

Pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial investigating a new algorithm combining a clinical score, LUS and PCT results (The PLUS algorithm) for the management of LRTIs among adults in EDs. The unit of randomization will be the ED.

Primary safety objective To demonstrate non-inferiority of the intervention in terms of clinical failure by day 28.

Co-primary efficacy objective To show a 15% reduction in the proportion of patients with LRTIs prescribed an antibiotic by day 28 in the intervention group compared with the usual care group.

Secondary objectives

• To compare the quality of life (bothersomeness of CAP-related symptoms) on day 7, day 28 and day 90 between patients in the intervention and control groups.
• To evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention through the identification of barriers and facilitators in patients and physicians.
• To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of the intervention as compared to usual care using a within-trial (short-term), and a model-based (long-term) economic evaluation.
• To develop an advanced automatic LUS image analysis method using machine learning to assist in LUS diagnosis and risk stratification.

Inclusion criteria

• Signed informed consent
• Patients aged 18 years or more
• Acute LRTI (acute illness, less than 21 days, with at least one lower respiratory tract symptom, i.e. cough, sputum, dyspnea, chest pain and no alternative explanation)
• At least one of the following clinical criteria:

• Focal abnormal auscultation (decreased breath sounds, crackles, bronchial breath sounds)
• Fever (documented temperature ≥ 38°C in the last 24 hours, including self-measured temperature ≥ 38°C)
• Tachypnea (respiratory rate ≥ 22/minute)
• Tachycardia (heart rate ≥ 100/minute)

Exclusion criteria

• Previous receipt of a quinolone, macrolide or ceftriaxone or, of more than one dose of any other antibiotic within 72h prior to enrolment (excepted prophylactic antibiotics or antibiotics given for urinary tract infection)
• Previous hospital stay in the last 14 days
• Cystic fibrosis
• Severe COPD (≥GOLD 3 or if not available, as a proxy: exacerbation treated with antibiotics during the last 6 months)
• Severe immunodeficiency (drug-induced neutropenia with <500 neutrophils/mm3, HIV infection with CD4<200 cells/mm3, solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipient, prednisone ≥ 20mg/day for >28 days)
• Initial admission of the patient in the intensive care unit
• Microbiologically-documented SARS-CoV-2
• Incapacity of discernment