Mag-tarmlab, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07584278
The goal of this double-blind parallel-arm randomized controlled trial is to learn if a probiotic supplement (containing a new strain derived from L. reuteri) alters outcomes related to symptom severity and transit time in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The main question it aims to answer is:
Does the probiotic alter IBS symptom severity?
Researchers will compare the probiotic to a placebo (a lookalike substance that contains no probiotic) to see if the probiotic works to alter outcomes.
Participants will:
Be randomized to either take the probiotic supplement or placebo supplement daily for 12 weeks.
Visit the lab for 4 study visits (visit 1: screening and informed consent; visit 2: randomization, data collection, beginning the intervention; visit 3: end of intervention and data collection; visit 4: 3 month post intervention follow up and data collection).
Provide biological samples (blood, stool, saliva, urine) Complete questionnaires
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden
Location status: Recruiting
The BIO-IBS study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating whether a combination probiotic improves symptoms in adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The trial also explores biological mechanisms and predictors of treatment response.
Background & Rationale IBS is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction (~4% prevalence in Sweden). Current treatments include dietary, pharmacological, and psychological approaches. Increasing evidence suggests the gut microbiome plays a key role, prompting interest in probiotics.
Aims
Study Design
Type: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group Participants: 252 adults with IBS Randomization: 1:1 (probiotic vs placebo) Treatment duration: 12 weeks Follow-up: 3 months post-treatment Timeline: Recruitment starting April 2026 lasting ~3 years
Participants Inclusion Criteria
Adult (≥18 years), IBS (Rome IV criteria) IBS-SSS > 75 BMI 18.5-35 Able to consent and complete Swedish questionnaires
Key Exclusion Criteria
Significant gastrointestinal or systemic disease Recent antibiotics (within 3 months) or probiotics (within 2 weeks) Opioid use Pregnancy/breastfeeding Significant lab abnormalities (e.g., high fecal calprotectin) Major lifestyle/treatment changes
Intervention
Active treatment: Tablet containing both L. reuteri strains Placebo: Identical without bacteria Dose: 1 tablet twice daily Duration: 12 weeks Compliance ≥80% required for per-protocol analysis.
Outcomes Primary Outcome
Change in IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS) from baseline to 12 weeks (intervention vs placebo)
Secondary Outcomes
Proportion achieving ≥50 or ≥100 point IBS-SSS reduction Gastrointestinal symptoms (GSRS-IBS) Pain reduction Quality of life (IBSQOL) Work productivity (WPAI:IBS) Transit time (gut motility) Adverse events Sustainability of effects (3-month follow-up)
Exploratory Outcomes
Stool consistency/frequency Biomarkers (microbiome, immune, metabolomics, etc.) Psychological and lifestyle factors Dietary influences Mechanistic insights into IBS
Study Procedures Visits Screening (2-8 weeks before randomization Consent, questionnaires, biological samples, diaries
Randomization (Day 0) Baseline assessments and start of treatment
During intervention Regular symptom tracking Phone follow-up at week 6
End of treatment (12 weeks) Repeat assessments and samples
Follow-up (3 months later) Long-term outcomes
Optional (Facultative) Assessments Rectal sensitivity (barostat) Sigmoidoscopy ± confocal endomicroscopy MRI (motility and colonic volume)
Measurements
Questionnaires: IBS-SSS, GSRS-IBS, HADS, PHQ-15, IBSQOL, stress, work productivity Biological samples: blood, stool, urine, saliva Gut function: transit time (radiopaque markers and sweetcorn method) Diet: food frequency and recall diaries
Statistical Considerations Sample size: 252 participants (powered to detect clinically meaningful IBS-SSS difference)
Populations:
Intention-to-treat (all randomized) Per-protocol (≥80% compliance, no major deviations) Analysis plan: Defined in a Statistical Analysis Plan No interim analysis
Safety Probiotics considered safe with minimal risk (mainly transient flatulence). Adverse events will be recorded and classified by severity and causality. IBS symptom fluctuations are not counted as adverse events unless worsened.
Ethics & Data Handling Conducted according to Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP. Participants give informed consent and can withdraw anytime. Data are pseudonymized and securely stored (REDCap)
Risk-Benefit Assessment Low risk due to established safety of L. reuteri strains Moderate participant burden (questionnaires, sample collection) Optional procedures may cause discomfort but are controlled and voluntary Potential benefit: improved IBS symptoms and better understanding of disease mechanisms
Key Strengths Large sample size Rigorous randomized controlled design Comprehensive symptom, biological, and mechanistic assessment Long follow-up
Conclusion This study aims to determine whether a novel probiotic combination improves IBS symptoms and to identify biological and clinical predictors of response, contributing to more personalized treatment strategies in IBS.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Probiotic using a new strain derived from L. reuteri.
A placebo supplement that is identical to the probiotic in formulation and packaging except that the probiotic bacteria is not present.
Time frame: Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Time frame: Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale- IBS (GSRS-IBS) scores over time between arms
The GSRS uses a 7- point Likert scale. Total scores can range from 15 - 105 with higher scores indicating worse symptom rating
Time frame: During intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
The proportion of individuals with greater or equal to 50% of assessments with an adequate relief of symptoms
Time frame: During intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
The proportion of individuals with greater or equal to 50% of assessments between baseline and end of intervention, and a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in worst pain during the last 24 hours compared to baseline
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Change in IBS-quality of life (IBS-QoL) scores over time between arms
The IBS-QoL is a 34-item scale that uses a 5-point Likert scale with total scores ranging from 0-100, where higher scores indicate better quality of life
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Change in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:IBS (WPAI:IBS) scores over time between arms
The WPAI:IBS consists of 6 items regarding employment status, hours of work missed because of IBS, hours missed because of other reasons, hours actually worked, how much IBS affected productivity of working (VAS of 0 to 10), how much IBS affected regular activities (VAS of 0 to 10). Total scores are expressed as percentage of impairment/productivity lost with higher scores indicating greater impairment
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
Participants will take oral tablets that are radiopaque markers following a specific protocol beginning from 7 days prior to attending the study visit. Each day they will swallow one set of radiopaque markers with water, then on day 7 a nurse will conduct an X-ray of the abdomen to show the location of the markers in the bowel.
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84)
Sweetcorn oro-anal transit time will be measured using a specific protocol. 7 days before attending the study visit the participants will be advised to eat 100g of sweetcorn at 0800 with minimal chewing. Following this, each time they open their bowel for the next 6 days they will be advised to visually inspect the stool for sweetcorn and record whether or not they see the sweetcorn in a diary.
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores over time between groups.
The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire (with 2 subscales: HADS-Depression (7 items) and HADS-Anxiety (7 items), with each item rated on a 4 point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0 - 21. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms for anxiety and depression
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) scores over time between groups
The PHQ is a 15-item questionnaire with each item rated on a 3-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating greater somatic symptom burden
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Changes in stool consistency and frequency measured using the ROME V questionnaire
The ROME V is a diagnostic questionnaire for disorders of the gut-brain interaction. Changes in stool consistency and frequency are related to a subset of questions in the Rome V (Q54 - 60). Items are rated on a 10-point Likert scale rated as a percentage of 0 - 100% regarding frequency of symptoms in the last 3 months, including: abdominal pain/ discomfort, how often abdominal pain happened close in time to a bowel movement, how often stools were harder than usual, how often stools were softer than usual, how often stools were more frequent than usual, and how often stools were less frequent than usual.
Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention (12 weeks)
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Fecal samples will be analysed in relation to factors regarding predictors of IBS symptoms and response to intervention (including gut microbiome and fecal metabolites)
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention)
Urine samples will be analysed in relation to factors regarding predictors of IBS symptoms (including urinary metabolites)
Time frame: Baseline (day 0 of intervention)
Saliva samples will be analysed in relation to factors regarding predictors of IBS symptoms (including salivary protease)
Time frame: Screening (15-60 days pre-intervention), baseline (day 0 of intervention), during intervention (days 14, 28, 42, 56, 70), end of intervention (day 84), 3 month follow up post intervention
Dietary intake will be recorded prior to and throughout the study period in seven 3-day diet diaries and analysed in relation to predictors of IBS symptoms and response to intervention
Time frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain rectal sensitivity in relation to IBS symptom predictors.
A balloon is inserted and inflated in the rectum in a controlled setting. The patient indicates when defined sensory thresholds are reached (first feeling of the balloon, urge to empty bowel, discomfort or pain). When the patient indicates discomfort or pain, or another reason to stop, the balloon inflation will be stopped.
Time frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain rectal sensitivity in relation to IBS symptom predictors
Alongside the rectal barostat, participants will complete the PRES, a 9-item questionnaire measured on a 4-item Likert scale. Total scores can range from 0 = 27 with higher scores indicating more frequent physical reactions to the rectal barostat
Time frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain gut permeability in relation to IBS symptom predictors
Time frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain colonic gas volumes in relation to IBS symptom predictors
Time frame: After screening, but pre-randomization (60 - 15 days pre-randomization)
This is an opt-in outcome for participants to ascertain small bowel motility in relation to IBS symptom predictors
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
MagTarmlab office
CONTACT
Magnus Simren, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Other
The Impact of Probiotics on Biomarkers and Symptom Severity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Acronym: BIO-IBS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07688044
Abdominal Pain, Colonic Diseases
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07635394
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Functional
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04506593
Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction, Colonic Diseases
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07646834
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
View Trial Details