Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04256785

Probiotic VSL#3 for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Associated to Fibromyalgia

The study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of probiotic VSL#3 for the treatment of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with fibromyalgia; 50% of the participants received probiotic and the remaining 50% received matching placebo in a double-blind, randomized design.The treatment was administered during a 12-week period and the participants were followed for an additional 12-week period in order to follow the evolution after treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Instituto de Neurociencias "Federico Oloriz"

Granada, 18012, Spain

About this study

Many patients with fibromyalgia experience associated gastrointestinal symptomatology such as abdominal pain, abdominal bloating, meteorism, diarrhea and/or constipation. To date there is not any specific treatment for these symptoms that markedly impair the quality of life of these subjects. This trial intended to investigate if the addition of a polymicrobial probiotic product, which has shown efficacy in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, was also be useful to ameliorate the gastrointestinal symptomatology of patients with fibromyalgia.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosed of fibromyalagia
  • experiencing at least 3 chronic gastrointestinal symptoms
  • signed informed consent to participate
  • accept to not change previously prescribed treatment during study duration

Exclusion criteria

  • mental illness excepting depression
  • severe organic disease
  • additional gastrointestinal disease excepting irritable bowel syndrome
  • pregnancy
  • breastfeeding

Treatment and study plan

VSL#3

Dietary Supplement

sachets containing probiotic

Placebo

Dietary Supplement

sachets containing placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Abdominal Bloating and Metheorism Each One Measured in a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

    Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR)

    Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

    The FIQR is a self-reported, validated questionnaire that evaluates the severity of fibromyalgia symptomatology in a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points; the higher the score, the worse the severity of the disease. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score)

  2. Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Insomnia Severity Inventory (ISI)

    Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

    The ISI is a self-reported, validated questionnaire that measures the severity of sleep disturbances in a scale ranging from 0 to 28 points: higher scores indicate more severe sleep disturbance

  3. Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Total Score of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

    PHQ-9 is a self-reported, validated questionnaire that measures the severity of depression in a scale ranging from 0 to 27 points; higher scores indicate more severe depression. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score)

  4. Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 PCS

    Time frame: baseline and twelve weeks after treatment

    The SF-36 is a self-reported, validated questionnaire evaluating the general health quality in a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points; it evaluates 8 heath domains that yield two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Higher scores indicate better general health quality. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score).

  5. Change, From Baseline to Endpoint (12 Weeks) in the Short-Form Health Survey SF-36 MCS

    Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks after treatment

    The SF-36 is a self-reported, validated questionnaire evaluating the general health quality in a scale ranging from 0 to 100 points; it evaluates 8 heath domains that yield two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Higher scores indicate better general health quality. Change = (week 12 score - baseline score).

  6. Number of Patients Considered as Responders to Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after treatment

    Patients that showed at least a a 30% reduction in the score of the primary variable, i.e. the composite ccore of abdominal pain, abdominal bloating and metheorism each one measured in a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale, were considered as responders to treatment.

  7. Change From Week 12 to Week 16 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment

    Time frame: Week 12 to week 16

    Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 16 score - week 12 score)

  8. Change From Week 12 to Week 20 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment

    Time frame: Week 12 to week 20

    Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 20 score - week 12 score)

  9. Change From Week 12 to Week 24 (Follow-up Period) in the Composite Score of Abdominal Pain, Bloating and Metheorism Among Responders After Discontinuing the Study Treatment

    Time frame: Week 12 to week 24

    Visual analogue scales are frequently used to evaluate subjective symptoms; they range from 0 (no symptom at all) to 10 (worst possible intensity of the symptom) points. In the present case the three most frequent abdominal symptoms reported by patients with fibromyalgia have been selected to compose the primary outcome variable. Total symptoms range was 0 to 30 points. Change = (week 24 score - week 12 score)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Elena Pita Calandre

Other

Collaborators

  • Actial Farmaceutica S.r.l.
  • Ferring Pharmaceuticals

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Tolerability of the Probiotic VSL#3 for the Treatment of Patients With Fibromyalgia and Associated Gastrointestinal Symptomatology: a Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Feb 5, 2020
Registry last updated
Aug 2, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.