Infliximab
Druginfliximab
NCT Number: NCT04835506
The OPTIMIZE Trial compares whether iDose dashboard-driven infliximab dosing (iDose-driven dosing) is more effective and safer than standard infliximab dosing for inducing and maintaining disease remission in inflammatory bowel disease.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me16 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
London Health Sciences Centre - Children's Hospital, London, Canada
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), namely Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are life-long chronic diseases characterized by transmural inflammation of the intestine. CD and UC are global diseases in the 21st century with increasing incidence in newly industrialized countries. One of the most effective therapies to treat patients with moderate to severe disease is the antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent infliximab (IFX) either as monotherapy or as a combination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM), such as azathioprine or methotrexate (MTX).
Although more effective, combination therapy is associated with more serious adverse events, such as serious opportunistic infections and cancers, as well as potential treatment adherence issues. Consequently, many patients and physicians choose to use IFX alone as safety is often prioritized over efficacy. Unfortunately, up to 30% of patients do not respond to induction therapy, and up to 50% of initial responders lose response over time. It is only if patients lose response that physicians check blood IFX concentrations (i.e., reactive therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM]), or empirically increase IFX dose. Reactive TDM helps to explain and better manage these patients with lack or loss of response to IFX. In many cases, the lack or LOR is due to low drug concentrations with or without development of antibodies to IFX (ATI). Unfortunately, reactive TDM or empiric dose escalation is often too late for patients who do not either respond to IFX induction therapy or lose response during maintenance. This reactive approach results in many patients losing IFX as a therapeutic option.
Preliminary data show that proactive IFX optimization to achieve a threshold drug concentration during maintenance therapy (even if the patient is asymptomatic) compared to empiric dose escalation and/or reactive TDM is associated with better long-term outcomes including longer drug persistence, reduced risk of relapse, and fewer hospitalizations and surgeries. IFX dosing by weight only (i.e., mg/kg) may not be adequate for many patients as interindividual variability in drug clearance and other factors affecting IFX concentrations and PK are often not accounted for. Dosing calculators take into account all of these individual factors and improve the precision of dosing towards better personalized medicine. These systems have already been validated, and personalized dosing has shown clinical benefit in patients with IBD.
This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study that plans to enroll 196 participants with inflammatory bowel disease. All eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IFX monotherapy with proactive TDM or SOC IFX therapy, with or without concomitant IMM therapy, and empiric dose optimization or reactive TDM, at the discretion of the investigator.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
infliximab
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with sustained corticosteroid-free (no CS use from Week 14 through 52) clinical remission (CD: CDAI <150 at Weeks 14, 26, 52; UC: PRO2 ≤ 1 with an RBS = 0) and no disease worsening
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects in CS-free clinical remission (CD: CDAI < 150; UC: PRO2 ≤ 1 with an RBS = 0) and no use of CS within previous 6 months)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects in deep remission (CD: CDAI < 150 and SES-CD ≤ 4, with no individual subscore > 1; UC: PRO2 ≤ 1 with an RBS = 0 and MES ≤ 1)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with a composite biological (hs-CRP < 10 mg/L) and endoscopic remission (CD: SES-CD ≤ 4; UC: MES ≤ 1)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with sustained CS-free clinical remission (CD: CDAI < 150; UC: PRO2 ≤ 1 with an RBS = 0) and no CS use or need for rescue therapy from Week 14 through Week 52)
Time frame: 14 weeks
Proportion of subjects who are primary nonresponders (≤ 70-point decrease in CDAI score or lack of a ≥ 1-point and 30% reduction from baseline in PRO2 and a ≥ 1-point reduction in RBS or an absolute RBS ≤ 1 for UC and at least one of: hs-CRP ≥10 mg/L, FC > 250 μg/g, or SES-CD > 4 or MES > 1 for UC, or disease worsening prior to Week 14)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with sustained biological remission (hs-CRP <10 mg/L)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with endoscopic remission (SES-CD ≤ 4, with no individual subscore > 1 for CD or MES ≤ 1 for UC)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with normalization of hs-CRP (decrease from ≥ 10 at baseline to < 10 mg/L)
Time frame: week 14, week 26, and week 52
Hs-CRP change from baseline
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with an endoscopic response (CD: ≥ 50% decrease from baseline SES-CD score; UC: ≥ 1-point decrease in MES)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects with normalization of fecal calprotectin (decrease from >250 µg/g at baseline to ≤ 250 µg/g)
Time frame: 52 weeks
fecal calprotectin change from baseline
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05221281
Adolescent Development, Colitis
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05316584
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04520594
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04522271
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details