California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
NCT Number: NCT00996814
The primary aim of the study is to demonstrate the value of a preemptive approach to ethics consultation in an ICU. The investigators hope to answer the question: Will proactive ethics interventions by a skilled and experienced ethicist, participating in treatment discussions with physicians and nurses, as well as discussions with patients/surrogates, improve the quality of ICU care experienced by patients requiring prolonged treatment in the ICU (5 days or longer) by increasing their perceived quality of care and reducing the length of stay in the ICU by non-survivors?
The study is a randomized trial of the use of an ethics consultant to address latent or manifest ethical issues in patients who remain in the ICU for five days or more, as compared to usual care. The investigators are testing the hypothesis that expanding the role of ethics consultations in the ICU to make them proactive will improve the process and outcomes of patient care by shortening the length of stay in non-survivors, and reducing suffering and unwanted and/or unnecessary aggressive treatments.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The ethicist will: 1) meet with the patient or surrogate to assess the case and the decision-making capacity of the patient; 2) make an ethical diagnosis, framing the issues in easily understood ethical terms with the involved parties; 3) recommend the next steps, including measures to improve communication. The ethicist will help to articulate consensus or disagreement and either facilitate implementing the consensus or facilitate ways to address and resolve disagreements; 4) document the consultation in the patient's medical record, identifying the ethical issues identified, the steps taken to address those issues, the options and ethical rationales considered, the outcome and the future plan; 5) follow-up to provide ongoing support and record a follow up progress note in the chart; and 6) participate in evaluation.
Time frame: Date and time of admission to date and time of discharge (in 24 hour periods)
Time frame: Survey administered every two days while patient is in the ICU and a final survey one month after discharge from the hospital
Time frame: Survey administered daily while patient in under their care and 48 hours after their patient's discharge
California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute
Other
Proactive Ethics Intervention to Improve ICU Care
Acronym: PEI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06666647
Emergency Medical Services, Intensive Care Patients Invasively Ventilated
Odense, Denmark
View Trial Details