Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05190172

PRO-GLIO: PROton Versus Photon Therapy in IDH-mutated Diffuse Grade II and III GLIOmas

Proton therapy is a powerful tool enabling oncologists to spare normal tissue around the target for irradiation much better than what can be achieved with photon irradiation. The infiltrative nature of IDH-mutated grade II and III diffuse glioma, however, renders proton therapy a potential problem. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the only option when trying to ensure that chances of long-term survival are not impaired seeking to reduce unwanted late treatment effects. Non-inferiority of proton therapy compared to photon irradiation is the primary endpoint of the RCT.

Hence, PRO-GLIO has two main objectives. First, PRO-GLIO will evaluate if proton therapy is safe in patients with IDH-mutated grade II and III diffuse glioma, showing that survival figures at 2 years from radiotherapy are not poorer in the proton arm than in the photon arm. Second, we want to find the true number of patients in need of rehabilitation in both arms, and evaluate if proton therapy conveys a higher QoL than photon irradiation at 2 years from radiotherapy.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

PRO-GLIO aims at establishing proton irradiation as standard radiotherapy for IDH-positive diffuse glioma grade II and III patients. First, PRO-GLIO will show that proton therapy is safe, despite the infiltrative nature of these tumors. Second, the HRQOL and neuropsychological investigating part of PRO-GLIO will show that patients irradiated with protons have a better outcome in this regard than those irradiated with photons. Inclusion criteria are a diagnosis of grade II or grade III IDH-mutated diffuse glioma, good performance status, indication for radiotherapy and age between 18 and 65 years.

Patients will be randomized to proton or photon radiotherapy and the study work will be divided in three work packages (WP).

  • In WP1, survival data will be the main focus, but the estimation of QALY will also be an important part - concentrating on differences between the two study arms. If there is truly no difference between the proton and photon radiotherapy on the probability of FIFS after two years, then 224 randomized patients (112 in each treatment group) are required to be 80% certain that the upper limit of a two-sided 95% confidence interval will exclude a difference in favor of the photon radiotherapy of more than 15%. This assumes a 0.8 probability of FIFS in the control arm, and no drop-outs.
  • In WP2, a battery of validated neuropsychological tests will be used to test the cognive abilities of the patients. All patients will be testes using an internet-based test (Cog-State) and 1/3 of patients will also have an in-depth neuropsychological evaluation. The two methods will be compared.
  • In WP3, a battery of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) questionnaires will be used to establish which subjective challenges this patient group struggles the most with.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

  • Patients must be 18 to 65 years old on the day of consent.
  • IDH-mutated astrocytoma grade 2 or 3, or oligodendroglioma grade 2 or 3 according to WHO 2021.
  • Indication for radiotherapy.
  • WHO/ECOG performance status 0-2.
  • Ability to undergo MRI.
  • No significant contrast enhancing tumour (more than 1 or 2 punctate contrast enhancing foci) at the time of randomization. In recurrence patients, no contrast enhancement is allowed unless a new biopsy confirms the diagnosis of IDH-mutated astrocytoma grade 2 or 3, or oligodendroglioma grade 2 or 3.
  • Ability and willingness to travel to a proton therapy centre if randomized to the proton therapy arm.
  • Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) must agree to use an effective method of contraception during radiotherapy, chemotherapy and 1 year after completion of chemotherapy. Pregnancy is not an ineligibility criterium if radiotherapy is indicated and cannot be postponed
  • Ability to understand the information about the study and included treatment.
  • Signed informed consent.
  • Ability to speak and understand Norwegian or Swedish language.

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior treatment (except surgery) for diffuse glioma
  • Concomitant or previous malignancies. Exceptions are adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri with a follow-up time of at least 3 years, or other previous malignancy with a disease-free interval of at least 5 years
  • Known CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion
  • Presence of any medical, psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical characteristic that might impair patient compliance for study protocol procedures including follow-up
  • Body weight > 150 kg

Treatment and study plan

radiation therapy

Radiation

Radiation therapy either with protons or photons

Primary outcomes

  1. First intervention free survival (FIFS) at 2 years

    Time frame: 2 years

    Survival

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total fatigue score assessed by the fatigue questionnaire developed by T. Chalder et al.

    Time frame: 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Symptom

  2. Change in cognitive functioning (composite score from CANTAB-tests) at 2 years

    Time frame: 5 months and 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Objective examination

  3. Overall survival

    Time frame: Median and at 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Survival

  4. FIFS

    Time frame: Median, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Survival

  5. Progression-free survival

    Time frame: Median and at 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Survival

  6. Change in neurological function as assessed by the NANO scale

    Time frame: 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Objective examination

  7. Global cognitive impairment index

    Time frame: 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Neuropsychological endpoint

  8. Rate of local, distant and combined recurrences

    Time frame: 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Disease development

  9. Rate of patients without epileptic seizures

    Time frame: 5 months and 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Symptom

  10. EORTC QLQ C30-based algorithm score

    Time frame: 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Quality of life

  11. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio

    Time frame: 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Health economics

  12. Rate of adverse events

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 and 5 months and 1 year, 2 , 5, 10 and 15 years

    Toxicity

  13. Costs in Norwegian kroner related to loss of production caused by disease and treatment

    Time frame: 2, 5, 10 and 15 years

    Health economics

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Danielle Hagen

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4722934000

Petter Brandal, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+47 22934000

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Haukeland University Hospital
  • Karolinska University Hospital
  • Lund University Hospital
  • Ryhov County Hospital
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
  • St. Olavs Hospital
  • The Skandion Clinic
  • University Hospital of North Norway
  • University Hospital, Linkoeping
  • University Hospital, Umeå
  • Uppsala University Hospital
  • Ôrebro University Hospital

Registry information

Acronym: PRO-GLIO

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2045
First posted
Jan 13, 2022
Registry last updated
May 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.