Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03455608

PRO-ACTIVE: Prophylactic Swallow Intervention for Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) is a common and potentially life-threatening toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). HNC survivors have a 20-24 percent lifetime risk of pneumonia after RT, which is associated with a 42 percent excess risk of death in survivorship. Moreover, dysphagia predisposes individuals to malnutrition, and at least half of HNC patients require feeding tubes during RT.

Patients are commonly referred for swallowing therapy with a speech pathologist. Some patients receive early intervention, before a swallowing problem begins-PRO-ACTIVE therapy. Other patients are monitored and prescribed dysphagia interventions only if and when a swallowing problem occurs-RE-ACTIVE therapy. Thus, REACTIVE therapy aims to reverse an already impaired swallowing ability, whereas PRO-ACTIVE therapy aims to prevent or reduce severity of dysphagia. These two broad categories of therapy represent the most common types of intervention offered to HNC patients across North America. Although there is single-institution evidence to support each practice, it is yet unknown which is most effective.

To address this gap, the primary aim of this international, multi-site 3-arm pragmatic randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of PRO-ACTIVE (high and low intensity) versus RE-ACTIVE swallowing therapy among 952 patients with HNC planning to undergo RT, using duration of feeding tube dependence after RT as the primary outcome. Our secondary aim proposes to compare the relative benefit or harm of these swallowing interventions on secondary outcomes considered relevant to our stakeholder partners.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Swallowing therapy is commonly provided as a behavioral treatment to lessen the risk or severity of dysphagia in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients; however, best practice is not established. This multi-site, international randomized clinical trial (RCT) will compare the effectiveness of PRO-ACTIVE (high and low intensity) versus RE-ACTIVE swallowing interventions in 952 HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The 3 study arms represent alternate timing and intensity of swallowing therapy delivered by a speech language pathologist: 1) RE-ACTIVE, 2) PRO-ACTIVE EAT, and 3) PRO-ACTIVE EAT + EXERCISE.

The primary aim of the PRO-ACTIVE trial is to compare the effectiveness of PRO-ACTIVE versus RE-ACTIVE swallowing interventions among patients with HNC planned to undergo RT. We hypothesize that the combined PRO-ACTIVE therapies are more effective than RE-ACTIVE therapy; and, if so, that more intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT + EXERCISE) is superior to less intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT). Effectiveness will be measured based on reduced duration of feeding tube dependency as the primary endpoint, an outcome valued equally by patients, caregivers and clinicians.

The secondary aim of the PRO-ACTIVE trial is to compare the relative benefit or harm of swallowing therapy arms on secondary outcomes including videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluations, functional status measures, health status measures, and patient-reported outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults ≥ 18 years of age diagnosed with head and neck malignancy;
  • RT treatment planned for curative intent;
  • Dispositioned to receive external beam radiotherapy dose ≥60 gray to bilateral fields at participating institution;
  • Sufficient fluency in written English, French, Spanish or Simplified Chinese to be able to complete the study patient reported outcome questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

  • Distant metastasis at enrollment; or
  • Prior or planned total laryngectomy; or
  • Moderate/severe dysphagia at enrollment per baseline videofluoroscopy DIGEST grade ≥2 (as graded per central laboratory review)
  • Previously seen by speech language pathologist for swallowing therapy for the current head and neck cancer
  • Diagnosis of second primary non-head and neck cancers in the thorax or the central nervous system at enrollment
  • Head and neck radiotherapy for thyroid or cutaneous/skin primary tumors, regardless of neck fields

Treatment and study plan

RE-ACTIVE

Behavioral

Reactive intervention started promptly if/when dysphagia is identified

PRO-ACTIVE EAT

Behavioral

Early low intensity proactive intervention started before RT commences

PRO-ACTIVE EAT + EXERCISE

Behavioral

Early high intensity proactive intervention started before RT commences

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of feeding tube dependence

    Time frame: Baseline - 12 months

    Effectiveness will be measured based on duration of feeding tube dependency (count of days from end of radiotherapy to last feeding tube use within the 12-month study period)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months

    Measurement of swallowing-related Quality of Life

  2. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months

    Measurement of severity or burden of cancer-related symptoms and interference with daily functioning.

  3. Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months

    Videofluoroscopy study score ranging from 0 to 5, where 4 is worst.

  4. Pharyngeal Constriction Ratio (PCR)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months

    Videofluoroscopy study score ranging from 0 to 1, where 1 is worst.

  5. Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months

    Videofluoroscopy study score ranging from 1 to 8, where 8 is worst.

  6. Peak esophageal opening

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months

    Videofluoroscopy study score ranging from 0 to infinity, where lower value is worse.

  7. Performance Status Scale Head and Neck (PSS-HN)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months

    Measurement of swallowing and speech performance

  8. Medical Outcome of Dysphagia (MOD)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months

    Patient reported symptoms related to health consequences secondary to dysphagia, namely: malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia and mood changes such as depression and anxiety

  9. Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI-V3)

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months

    Measurement of self-efficacy strategies for coping with cancer

  10. EQ-5D-5L

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months

    Measurement of generic quality of life

  11. Medical History

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months

    Intake details, radiation therapy details, chemotherapy details, tumour status, surgery history, tracheotomy, feeding tube status, feeding tube dependence, concomitant therapies, and complication details.

  12. Pain Medications

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6/7, 3 Month, and 12 Months

    All pain medications (including over-the-counter) taken in the past 48 hours

  13. Mouth Opening/Trismus

    Time frame: Baseline; 3 Month and 12 Months

    Measurement of interincisal opening

  14. Hospitalization/Emergency Department (ED) Presentation

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months

    Hospitalization/ED presentation at cancer hospital or any external institutions

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto

Other

Collaborators

  • Applied Health Research Centre
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Qualitative Health Research Consultants, LLC

Registry information

Official study title

PRO-ACTIVE: Comparing The Effectiveness of Prophylactic Swallow Intervention for Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Acronym: PRO-ACTIVE

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Mar 6, 2018
Registry last updated
Dec 10, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.