RE-ACTIVE
BehavioralReactive intervention started promptly if/when dysphagia is identified
NCT Number: NCT03455608
Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) is a common and potentially life-threatening toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). HNC survivors have a 20-24 percent lifetime risk of pneumonia after RT, which is associated with a 42 percent excess risk of death in survivorship. Moreover, dysphagia predisposes individuals to malnutrition, and at least half of HNC patients require feeding tubes during RT.
Patients are commonly referred for swallowing therapy with a speech pathologist. Some patients receive early intervention, before a swallowing problem begins-PRO-ACTIVE therapy. Other patients are monitored and prescribed dysphagia interventions only if and when a swallowing problem occurs-RE-ACTIVE therapy. Thus, REACTIVE therapy aims to reverse an already impaired swallowing ability, whereas PRO-ACTIVE therapy aims to prevent or reduce severity of dysphagia. These two broad categories of therapy represent the most common types of intervention offered to HNC patients across North America. Although there is single-institution evidence to support each practice, it is yet unknown which is most effective.
To address this gap, the primary aim of this international, multi-site 3-arm pragmatic randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of PRO-ACTIVE (high and low intensity) versus RE-ACTIVE swallowing therapy among 952 patients with HNC planning to undergo RT, using duration of feeding tube dependence after RT as the primary outcome. Our secondary aim proposes to compare the relative benefit or harm of these swallowing interventions on secondary outcomes considered relevant to our stakeholder partners.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
Swallowing therapy is commonly provided as a behavioral treatment to lessen the risk or severity of dysphagia in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients; however, best practice is not established. This multi-site, international randomized clinical trial (RCT) will compare the effectiveness of PRO-ACTIVE (high and low intensity) versus RE-ACTIVE swallowing interventions in 952 HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The 3 study arms represent alternate timing and intensity of swallowing therapy delivered by a speech language pathologist: 1) RE-ACTIVE, 2) PRO-ACTIVE EAT, and 3) PRO-ACTIVE EAT + EXERCISE.
The primary aim of the PRO-ACTIVE trial is to compare the effectiveness of PRO-ACTIVE versus RE-ACTIVE swallowing interventions among patients with HNC planned to undergo RT. We hypothesize that the combined PRO-ACTIVE therapies are more effective than RE-ACTIVE therapy; and, if so, that more intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT + EXERCISE) is superior to less intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT). Effectiveness will be measured based on reduced duration of feeding tube dependency as the primary endpoint, an outcome valued equally by patients, caregivers and clinicians.
The secondary aim of the PRO-ACTIVE trial is to compare the relative benefit or harm of swallowing therapy arms on secondary outcomes including videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluations, functional status measures, health status measures, and patient-reported outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Reactive intervention started promptly if/when dysphagia is identified
Early low intensity proactive intervention started before RT commences
Early high intensity proactive intervention started before RT commences
Time frame: Baseline - 12 months
Effectiveness will be measured based on duration of feeding tube dependency (count of days from end of radiotherapy to last feeding tube use within the 12-month study period)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months
Measurement of swallowing-related Quality of Life
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months
Measurement of severity or burden of cancer-related symptoms and interference with daily functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Videofluoroscopy study score ranging from 0 to 5, where 4 is worst.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Videofluoroscopy study score ranging from 0 to 1, where 1 is worst.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Videofluoroscopy study score ranging from 1 to 8, where 8 is worst.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Videofluoroscopy study score ranging from 0 to infinity, where lower value is worse.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months
Measurement of swallowing and speech performance
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Patient reported symptoms related to health consequences secondary to dysphagia, namely: malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia and mood changes such as depression and anxiety
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Measurement of self-efficacy strategies for coping with cancer
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months
Measurement of generic quality of life
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months
Intake details, radiation therapy details, chemotherapy details, tumour status, surgery history, tracheotomy, feeding tube status, feeding tube dependence, concomitant therapies, and complication details.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6/7, 3 Month, and 12 Months
All pain medications (including over-the-counter) taken in the past 48 hours
Time frame: Baseline; 3 Month and 12 Months
Measurement of interincisal opening
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6/7, 3 months, 12 months
Hospitalization/ED presentation at cancer hospital or any external institutions
University Health Network, Toronto
Other
PRO-ACTIVE: Comparing The Effectiveness of Prophylactic Swallow Intervention for Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
Acronym: PRO-ACTIVE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05278039
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03377270
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04698499
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT01349309
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial Details