Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07593066

PRIORITY Study in Cervical Cancer

The PRIORITY study is a prospective, multicenter observational study designed to evaluate an integrated diagnostic model combining extended molecular self-sampling and digital colposcopy supported by telemedicine for the prioritization of women at risk of cervical cancer.

The study aims to assess the diagnostic performance, concordance, and clinical utility of this integrated approach in real-world settings, as well as its impact on diagnostic timeliness and patient navigation across different levels of care.

Participants will undergo standard-of-care evaluation, and data will be collected on molecular test results, colposcopic findings, diagnostic outcomes, and time intervals within the care pathway. No interventions are assigned as part of the study protocol.

The findings are expected to inform scalable strategies to improve early detection and optimize diagnostic pathways for cervical cancer, particularly in settings with structural and geographic barriers to timely care.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

The PRIORITY study is a prospective, multicenter observational study designed to evaluate an integrated diagnostic model for cervical cancer that combines extended high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling, digital colposcopy, and telemedicine-based prioritization.

The study will be conducted across multiple healthcare centers in Chile, including primary care and referral centers, reflecting real-world clinical pathways. Participants will be women undergoing evaluation for cervical cancer screening or diagnostic follow-up according to standard clinical practice. No interventions are assigned as part of the study protocol.

Data will be collected prospectively and will include results from molecular HPV testing, digital colposcopic assessments, and histopathological findings when available. Additional variables will include time intervals across the diagnostic pathway, including time from screening to diagnostic confirmation, as well as healthcare system navigation indicators.

The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic performance and concordance between molecular testing and colposcopic findings. Secondary objectives include evaluation of diagnostic timeliness, feasibility of implementing the integrated model, and patient-reported experience measures.

This study is designed to generate real-world evidence on the potential of integrated diagnostic strategies to improve prioritization and reduce delays in cervical cancer detection, particularly in settings with structural and geographic barriers to timely care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 30 to 65 years
  • Eligible for cervical cancer screening according to national guidelines
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
  • Able to perform self-sampling or attend clinical evaluation if required

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous diagnosis of cervical cancer
  • History of total hysterectomy (removal of the cervix)
  • Current pregnancy if it precludes study procedures according to clinical judgment
  • Any medical or social condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, would interfere with participation or follow-up

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of the integrated molecular and digital model for detection of CIN2+

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the combined strategy including extended molecular self-sampling, clinician-collected sampling, and digital colposcopy for detecting histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).

    Measure reported: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Concordance between self-collected and clinician-collected samples for high-risk HPV and extended molecular panel detection

    Time frame: Baseline

    Agreement between vaginal self-sampling and clinician-collected cervical samples for detection of high-risk HPV genotypes and extended molecular findings, assessed using Cohen's kappa and percent agreement.

    Measure reported: Cohen's kappa coefficient and percent agreement.

  2. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and vaginal dysbiosis markers detected by extended molecular screening

    Time frame: Baseline

    Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and vaginal dysbiosis markers detected through the extended molecular panel, including Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, Trichomonas vaginalis, bacterial vaginosis-associated markers, Candida species, and genital ulcer pathogens.

    Measure reported:

    Prevalence (%) of sexually transmitted infections and vaginal dysbiosis markers detected through extended molecular screening.

  3. Prevalence ratio of high-risk HPV positivity in participants with sexually transmitted infections detected by extended molecular screening

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Prevalence ratio of high-risk HPV positivity among participants with sexually transmitted infections detected using the extended molecular screening panel. High-risk HPV positivity will be defined as the proportion (%) of participants with a positive validated molecular HPV test.

    Measure reported: Prevalence ratio (PR) with 95% confidence intervals.

  4. Odds ratio for histologically confirmed CIN2+ in participants with sexually transmitted infections detected by extended molecular screening

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Odds ratio for histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) among participants with sexually transmitted infections detected using the extended molecular screening panel. CIN2+ will be defined as the proportion (%) of participants with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.

    Measure reported: Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals.

  5. Time to diagnostic resolution

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Time from initial molecular self-sampling to diagnostic resolution, defined as histological confirmation when clinically indicated or completion of diagnostic evaluation according to standard care.

    Measure reported: days from initial molecular self-sampling to diagnostic resolution.

Other outcomes

  1. Participant-Reported Acceptability Score Using the Self-Sampling and Telemedicine Diagnostic Pathway Acceptability Questionnaire

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Participant-reported acceptability will be assessed using the investigator-developed Self-Sampling and Telemedicine Diagnostic Pathway Acceptability Questionnaire, a structured 5-item questionnaire evaluating ease of self-sampling, confidence in performing the procedure, understanding of instructions, comfort with digital colposcopy, and satisfaction with telemedicine-supported follow-up. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5. A composite score will be calculated by summing all item responses. Scores range from 5 to 25 points, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.

    Measure reported: Composite acceptability score (range 5-25 points; higher scores indicate greater acceptability).

  2. Direct transportation costs associated with the diagnostic pathway

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Participant-reported transportation expenses associated with screening, diagnostic evaluation, referral visits, and follow-up care will be assessed using an investigator-developed healthcare utilization and cost questionnaire. Total transportation costs will be calculated as the cumulative sum of all transportation-related expenses incurred throughout the diagnostic pathway.

    Measure reported: Total transportation cost in Chilean pesos (CLP).

  3. Productive Activity Days Lost Associated With the Diagnostic Pathway

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Number of participant-reported productive activity days lost throughout the diagnostic pathway, assessed as a single cumulative count variable.

    Measure reported: Total number of productive activity days lost.

  4. Indirect non-medical expenses associated with the diagnostic pathway

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Participant-reported indirect non-medical expenses incurred during the diagnostic process will be assessed using an investigator-developed healthcare utilization and cost questionnaire. Total indirect non-medical expenses will be calculated as the cumulative sum of eligible participant-reported expenses.

    Measure reported: Total indirect non-medical expenses in Chilean pesos (CLP).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mauricio A Cuello, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+56223543034

Nicolás Saez, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+56223543034

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The PRIORITY Study in Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Evaluation of an Integrated Molecular and Digital Model for Diagnostic Prioritization

Acronym: PRIORITY

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
May 18, 2026
Registry last updated
May 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.