Jack Jiaqi Zhang
Hong Kong, 000000
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06509789
Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke.
Hypothesis to be tested: We hypothesize that low intensity priming iTBS can maximize the induction of therapeutically beneficial metaplasticity, and that this will be reflected in enhanced cortical excitation and reduced cortical inhibition, thereby enabling superior upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke.
Design and subjects: A randomized controlled trial involving 108 patients with chronic stroke.
Study instruments: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG).
Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following four groups: (1) low intensity priming iTBS (55% resting motor threshold [RMT] continuous theta burst stimulation [cTBS]+70% RMT iTBS); (2) conventional intensity priming iTBS (70% RMT cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); (3) nonpriming iTBS (sham cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); and (4) sham stimulation (sham cTBS+sham iTBS). All participants will receive 60-minute standard motor training after completion of the stimulation program. The intervention will last four weeks, with three sessions per week.
Main outcome measures: Upper limb motor tests and levels of cortical excitation/inhibition measured by TMS-evoked EEG potentials.
Data analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Expected results: The low intensity priming iTBS protocol will be the most efficacious protocol for enhancing cortical excitation and reducing cortical inhibition in post-stroke patients and will thereby produce superior outcomes with regard to upper limb motor functionality.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hong Kong, 000000
Location status: Recruiting
Objectives: To compare the effects of low intensity priming intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with those derived from conventional intensity priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, and sham stimulation in terms of improving hemiparetic upper limb motor functionality and modulating cortical excitation/inhibition in patients with stroke.
Hypothesis to be tested: We hypothesize that low intensity priming iTBS can maximize the induction of therapeutically beneficial metaplasticity, and that this will be reflected in enhanced cortical excitation and reduced cortical inhibition, thereby enabling superior upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke.
Design and subjects: A randomized controlled trial involving 108 patients with chronic stroke.
Study instruments: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG).
Interventions: Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the following four groups: (1) low intensity priming iTBS (55% resting motor threshold [RMT] continuous theta burst stimulation [cTBS]+70% RMT iTBS); (2) conventional intensity priming iTBS (70% RMT cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); (3) nonpriming iTBS (sham cTBS+70% RMT iTBS); and (4) sham stimulation (sham cTBS+sham iTBS). All participants will receive 60-minute standard motor training after completion of the stimulation program. The intervention will last four weeks, with three sessions per week.
Main outcome measures: Upper limb motor tests and levels of cortical excitation/inhibition measured by TMS-evoked EEG potentials.
Data analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Expected results: The low intensity priming iTBS protocol will be the most efficacious protocol for enhancing cortical excitation and reducing cortical inhibition in post-stroke patients and will thereby produce superior outcomes with regard to upper limb motor functionality.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded:
This procedure uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain involved in various neurological functions, such as motor control. Theta burst stimulation is a patterned form of TMS protocol.
Time frame: Baseline
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
Time frame: At 3 weeks
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
Time frame: At one-month
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity Scores (FMA-UE) is the gold standard for evaluating poststroke upper limb motor control. This assessment is used to determine the movement, coordination, and reflex actions of the hemiplegic upper limb
Time frame: Baseline
TMS-evoked potential is a time-locked signal elicited by single TMS pulses delivered to the cortex. P30 means the positive peak appeared at 30 ms after stimulation. The amplitude of P30 is correlated with cortical excitability mediated by excitatory interneurons.
Time frame: At 3 weeks
TMS-evoked potential is a time-locked signal elicited by single TMS pulses delivered to the cortex. P30 means the positive peak appeared at 30 ms after stimulation. The amplitude of P30 is correlated with cortical excitability mediated by excitatory interneurons.
Time frame: At one-month
TMS-evoked potential is a time-locked signal elicited by single TMS pulses delivered to the cortex. P30 means the positive peak appeared at 30 ms after stimulation. The amplitude of P30 is correlated with cortical excitability mediated by excitatory interneurons.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Other
Optimizing the Intensity of Priming Theta Burst Stimulation to Improve Hemiparetic Upper Limb Motor Functions After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06615973
Brain Disease, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05378035
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT03821129
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07737431
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
View Trial Details