Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02916199

Primary Needle Knife Fistulotomy Versus Conventional Cannulation Method

The aim of this study are to evaluate the feasibility of needle knife fistulotomy (NKF) as an initial procedure for biliary access in patients with biliary disease who are at increased risk for post-endoscopic retrograde endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (PEP) and to assess the incidence rate of complications including PEP between NKF and conventional cannulation methods.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Bundang-gu, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Endoscopic retrograde endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic and biliary tract disease. However, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common adverse event following the procedure, ranging from 2% to 10% in nonselective cases, and it can cause substantial morbidity, mortality, or high medical costs. Recent advances in cannulation technique and accessories for biliary cannulation have contributed to reduce the incidence of PEP, but biliary cannulation can fail in 5% to 20% of cases of ERCP. Suprapapillary needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF), with or without large-diameter balloon dilation, has been used as a rescue method in cases of difficult biliary cannulation, and NKF was recommended as an initial approach to selective biliary cannulation in cases of repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulation.9 Moreover, difficult biliary cannulation is known to be a risk factor for PEP, and it has been reported that NKF is associated with a low risk of PEP. Thus, we hypothesized that NKF may reduce the risk of PEP in patients who are at increased risk for PEP.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient who submitted a written informed consent for the this trial, and 18 ~ 90 years old
  • Patient who have naïve ampulla (no previous procedure was performed at ampulla)
  • Patient who is suspected to have biliary obstruction or biliary disease
  • Patient who is needed to have endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for treatment of biliary obstruction
  • Patient who have risks of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis among bellows (at least one more);
  • suspected biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
  • young age (18~50 years)
  • female
  • normal common bile duct diameter (≤9mm)
  • normal serum bilirubin level
  • Obesity (body mass index > 30)
  • Past history of acute pancreatitis

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient who is below 18 year old
  • Patient who is pregnant
  • Patient with mental retardation
  • Patient is sensitive to contrast agents
  • Patient who received sphincterotomy or pancreatobiliary operation previously
  • Patient who have ampulla of Vater cancer
  • Patient who have difficulty for approach to ampulla due to abdominal surgery including stomach cancer with Billroth II anastomosis
  • Patient who have pancreatic diseases as bellow (at least one more);
  • Patient who have acute pancreatitis within 30days before enrollment
  • Patient who have idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis
  • Patient who have pancreatic divisum
  • Patient who have obstructive chronic pancreatitis
  • Patient who pancreatic cancer
  • Patients who have improper ampulla shape as bellows;
  • Small ampulla (ampulla without oral protrusion)
  • Flat or crooked or asymmetric ampulla
  • Ampulla with peri-ampullary diverticulum type I or II

Treatment and study plan

cannulation of ampulla of Vater

Device

Cannulation of ampulla of Vater is a procedure that a guide-wire is passed through ampulla using interventional devices

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence rate of complications including bleeding, perforation and infection

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Success rate of cannulation

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Success rate of stone removal

    Time frame: 1 day

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gangnam Severance Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Primary Needle Knife Fistulotomy Versus Conventional Cannulation Method in Patients With High Risk of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Sep 27, 2016
Registry last updated
Jan 30, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.