Clínica Eduardo Anitua
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava, 01005, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06715085
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of PRGF in reducing pain and improving patients' quality of life. Researchers will compare an experimental drug (Plasma Rich in Growth Factors) to a control corticosteroid solution in saline solution.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava, 01005, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The PRGF application consists of three series of infiltrations in the intervertebral disc, epidural space and facets, with a frequency of two weeks.
Other names: PRGF injection
The corticosteroid solution application consists of two series of infiltrations of solution of corticosteroid (Celestone Cronodose injectable suspension [betamethasone]) and saline solution in the epidural space and in the facets, with a periodicity of one month between them.
Other names: Corticosteroid solution
Time frame: 6 moths follow up
Efficacy: evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire).
For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5. If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows:
Example: 16 (total scored) --> 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% Minimum detectable change (90% confidence): 10% points (change of less than this may be attributable to error in the measurement)
0% to 20%: minimal disability 21%-40%: moderate disability 41%-60%: severe disability 61%-80%: crippled 81%-100%: either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms
Time frame: 1, 3, and 12 months follow-up
Percentage of treatment failures at 1, 3, and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: Up to 56 weeks
Safety variables: each of the adverse events will be described, with a frequency analysis of the safety variables by treatment group, and a subsequent comparison of these by means of the chi-square test.
Time frame: Up to 56 weeks
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The two arms of the trial will be compared to estimate the ICER. Costs will be calculated at the individual level and prospectively.
Time frame: Up to 56 weeks
As a measure of effectiveness, quality of life adjusted life years (QoLs) will be calculated as a function of the duration measured by the study and the EuroQol values obtained before and at 56 weeks.
Time frame: 1 , 3, and 12 months of follow-up
Evaluation of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) scale. It is scored from 0 to 10, the lower the score, the better the result.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6 and 12 moths follow up
SF-12 Health Survey. This survey asks for the views about health. The result obtained depends on an algorithm. From the physical domain of the scale, the best result is 56.57 and the worst, 23.99. From the mental domain of the scale, the best result is 60.75 and the worst 19.06.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6 and 12 moths follow up
To assess the quality of life (EQ-5D-5L survey) related to health or perceived health (in its two aspects, physical and mental). Score from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best result in terms of health.
Time frame: 1 year
Differences at 12 months with respect to baseline determinations of the Pfirrmann grade
Time frame: 1 year
Differences at 12 months with respect to baseline determinations of the size of the disc herniation.
Time frame: 1 year
Differences at 12 months with respect to baseline determinations of the Intervertebral space height (endplate to endplace).
Time frame: 1 year
Differences at 12 months with respect to baseline determinations of the disc volume.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Biotechnology Institute IMASD
Industry
Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of PRGF-ENDORET® Infiltrations in the Treatment of Low Back Pain.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.