Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00049842

Prevention of Disease Progress in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients With Liver Fibrosis (Study P02570AM2)(COMPLETED)

The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PEG-Intron versus no treatment for the prevention of fibrosis progression in adult participants with moderate to severe liver fibrosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C, who failed PEG-Intron plus Rebetol treatment in protocol P02370 (NCT00039871).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age at entry in study P02370 (NCT00039871) 18-65 years;
  • Nonresponder to PEG-Intron plus Rebetol in study P02370

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants who did not participate in the P02370 study.
  • Any medical condition, including but not limited to decompensated liver disease, malignancy or substance abuse, that developed during the P02370 study which could interfere with the participant's participation in and completion of this study.

Treatment and study plan

peginterferon alfa-2b (SCH 54031)

Biological

0.5 µg/kg Weekly QW SC for 36 months

Primary outcomes

  1. Fibrosis Response Status (ie, Improvement, no Change, or the Worsening of the Fibrosis Score in Participants With Baseline METAVIR Fibrosis Score of F2 or F3).

    Time frame: Baseline to up to Month-36

    Definitions:

    Fibrosis scoring: F0 (no fibrosis), F1 (stellate enlargement of portal tract without septa formation, F2 (enlargement of portal tract with rare septa formation, F3 (numerous septa without cirrhosis), F4 (cirrhosis).

    Improved: Participants whose METAVIR fibrosis score at up to Month-36 decreases by 1 or more units compared to baseline.

    No Change: Participants whose METAVIR fibrosis score at up to Month-36 is the same as the baseline score.

    Worsened: Participants whose METAVIR fibrosis score at up to Month-36 increases by 1 or more units compared to baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inflammation Response Status (ie, Improvement, no Change, or the Worsening of the METAVIR Activity Score as Compared to Baseline)

    Time frame: Baseline to up to Month-36

    Activity Scoring: A0 (no histological activity), A1 (minimal activity), A2 (moderate activity), A3 (severe activity), A4 (lobular chronic hepatitis).

    Changes in liver inflammation defined as follows:

    Improved: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-36 decreases by 1 or more units compared to baseline.

    No Change: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-36 is the same as the baseline score.

    Worsened: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-36 increases by 1 or more units compared to baseline.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to up to Month-36 in the METAVIR Fibrosis Score (Using a Continuous Scale)

    Time frame: Baseline to up to Month-36

    The change of Metavir Fibrosis Score = Metavir Fibrosis Score at up to Month-36 - Metavir Fibrosis Score at Baseline.

    Fibrosis scoring: 0 (no fibrosis), 1 (stellate enlargement of portal tract without septa formation, 2 (enlargement of portal tract with rare septa formation, 3 (numerous septa without cirrhosis), 4 (cirrhosis).

  3. The Number of Participants Whose METAVIR Fibrosis Score Did Not Worsen (ie, the Response Status of Improved/no Change) During Treatment Compared to Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline to up to Month-36

    Definitions:

    Fibrosis scoring: F0 (no fibrosis), F1 (stellate enlargement of portal tract without septa formation, F2 (enlargement of portal tract with rare septa formation, F3 (numerous septa without cirrhosis), F4 (cirrhosis).

    Improved: Participants whose METAVIR fibrosis score at up to Month-36 decreases by 1 or more units compared to baseline.

    No Change: Participants whose METAVIR fibrosis score at up to Month-36 is the same as the baseline score.

    Worsened: Participants whose METAVIR fibrosis score at up to Month-36 increases by 1 or more units compared to baseline.

  4. Mean Change in the METAVIR Activity Score (Using a Continuous Scale)

    Time frame: Baseline to up to Month-36

    The change of Metavir Activity Score = Metavir Activity Score at up to Month-36 - Metavir Activity Score at Baseline.

    Activity Scoring: 0 (no histological activity), 1 (minimal activity), 2 (moderate activity), 3 (severe activity), 4 (lobular chronic hepatitis).

  5. Number of Participants With no Worsening (ie, the Response Status of Improved/ no Change) in the METAVIR Activity Score During the Treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline to up to Month-36

    Definitions:

    Activity Scoring: A0 (no histological activity), A1 (minimal activity), A2 (moderate activity), A3 (severe activity), A4 (lobular chronic hepatitis).

    Improved: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-36 decreases by 1 or more units compared to baseline.

    No Change: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-36 is the same as the baseline score.

    Worsened: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-36 increases by 1 or more units compared to baseline.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

PEG-Intron(TM) Maintenance Therapy vs. an Untreated Control Group for Prevention of Progression of Fibrosis in Adult Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C With Hepatic Fibrosis (METAVIR Fibrosis Score of F2 or F3), Who Failed Therapy With PEG-Intron Plus REBETOL(R) (in Protocol No. P02370)

Important dates

Study start
2002
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Nov 15, 2002
Registry last updated
Apr 4, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.