Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02377284

Prevention and Management of Food Allergies

This pilot study will test the use of visual cues to engage food service workers in protecting patrons with food allergies. Food service workers from Philadelphia quick-service restaurants were recruited to participate in a survey of attitudes that includes an embedded randomized experiment testing an experimental cue (photograph of an allergic child) to increase workers' engagement and empathy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Aim: Investigators pilot-tested a novel strategy to engage food service workers, by using a visual cue to increase the workers empathy for and desire to protect the patrons health and safety.

Why intervene with food service workers? Both food allergies and allergenic foods are common, as is eating, making accidental ingestion of allergenic foods almost inevitable. Risks may be particularly pronounced in out-of-home contexts (restaurants, school cafeterias, etc.), where the food allergic person must rely on service workers to assure their safety. Therefore, food service workers are important partners in the prevention of adverse events.

Design: Within the context of a survey of food service workers, investigators embedded a randomized experiment. In this experiment, investigators randomly assigned survey participants to one of two conditions: a Personalized vs. Depersonalized Chef Card. Depersonalized Chef Cards included simple written instructions regarding the patron's specific food allergies, including explicit guidance regarding foods to be avoided and information regarding the seriousness of the allergy. Personalized Chef Cards included identical written instructions and information, as well as a photograph of a patron with food allergies.

Hypothesis: Service workers exposed to the Personalized (compared to Depersonalized) Chef Cards will demonstrate greater empathy, sympathy, willingness to help, and vigilance regarding food allergies and their management.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Employed at a quick-service restaurant
  • Speaks English

Exclusion criteria

  • Work at a table-only establishment

Treatment and study plan

Photograph

Other

Add a photograph to a chef card.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean knowledge and attitude scores reported by participants in both study groups

    Time frame: Investigators measured primary outcomes on Day 1 for each participant.

    Mean scores (on a scale from 0-100, assessed using a survey) for knowledge and attitudes regarding food allergic patrons among both the intervention and control groups.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean empathy and desire to learn scores reported by participants in both study groups

    Time frame: Investigators measured secondary outcomes on Day 1 for each participant.

    Mean scores (on a scale from 0-100, assessed using a survey) for willingness to assist patrons with food allergies and desire to learn more about food allergies among both the intervention and control groups.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Engaging Food Service Workers in the Prevention of Food Allergy-related Adverse Events

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Mar 3, 2015
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.