Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04678960

Preventing Opioid Use Among Justice-involved Youth as They Transition to Adulthood Leveraging Safe Adults (LeSA)

Across the US, substance use is a significant public health concern, with juvenile justice (JJ)-involved youth representing a particularly vulnerable population. The current study proposes to adapt and test an intervention Trust-based Relational Intervention® (TBRI®) for preventing initiation and/or escalation of opioid misuse among older adolescents involved in the JJ system. Successful completion of study aims will provide information on TBRI's utility for older JJ adolescents, barriers and facilitators of sustainment, and provide training and implementation support for sustainment in participating facilities.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

15 year–20 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Illinois Youth Center - Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Across the US, substance use (SU) is a significant public health concern, with an estimated 11.1 million misusing prescription opioids. Rates of opioid use disorders (OUDs) have increased exponentially, with 60% of overdoses attributed to heroin and illicit synthetics (such as Fentanyl). Although opioid use among youth is low compared to adults, experimentation and regular use increases later in adolescence as youth transition to adulthood. Juvenile justice (JJ)-involved youth represent a particularly vulnerable population, as they often experience mental health disorders, dysfunctional family/social relationships, and complex trauma, placing them at greater risk for SU and substance use disorders (SUDs). To ensure that these youth do not become another opioid statistic, innovative and effective prevention interventions are needed. The investigators propose to adapt and test an intervention for preventing initiation and/or escalation of opioid misuse among older JJ-involved adolescents. The target enrollment group will be youth aging out of JJ (15-18 years at study enrollment) who are transitioning to their communities after a period of detainment in a secure treatment or correctional facility. Trust-based Relational Intervention® (TBRI®; a relational, attachment-based intervention that promotes emotional regulation through interaction with responsive adults) will be adapted as a prevention intervention targeting youth at risk for SU (especially non-medical use of opioids). Safe adults (e.g., parent/guardian, extended family member) will be trained in behavior management techniques for empowering youth to appropriately express their needs, connecting them with others in pro-social ways, and correcting or reshaping undesirable behavior. The proposed Effectiveness/Implementation study will examine both the effectiveness of TBRI for preventing opioid misuse and the comparative utility of three support formats: (1) TBRI Training only, (2) TBRI Training + Structured Coaching, or (3) TBRI Training + Responsive Coaching (triggered by the youth's need/risk). A total of 360 youth/safe adult dyads will be recruited from 9 participating JJ facilities over a 3-year period, and followed for 18 months post-release (15 youth-adult dyads/year per facility). This design enables a comparison of TBRI versus Standard Reentry Practice (SRP; using a stepped-wedge design where each facility serves as its own control) plus a randomized control trial comparing 3 TBRI support formats. This study will also examine barriers and facilitators of TBRI sustainment. Ninety JJ staff (10 from each agency) will provide input annually via focus groups and surveys. TCU will work with administrators and staff at each JJ facility to implement a sustainment plan, which will include developing in-house TBRI expertise (i.e., staff training and implementation assistance). Successful completion of study aims will provide a test of the adapted intervention and will facilitate sustainment by providing training and implementation support to participating facilities.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

For the effectiveness component,

  • Youth ages 15-18 at study enrollment
  • Being disposed to community supervision (i.e., probation) following a minimum of 2 months in the secure residential JJ facility
  • No indication of active suicide risk
  • Being able to identify one safe adult that is willing to participate in the study.

For the implementation component:

  • All staff with direct care or supervisory responsibilities within and outside the facilities (i.e., officers supervising youth after release) working with TCU on the LeSA project.

Exclusion criteria

  • Youth outside the age range described above
  • Active suicide risk at the time of recruitment

Treatment and study plan

Trust-based Relational Intervention Training

Behavioral

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI Group Training is comprised of three components: TBRI Youth Group Training (youth only), Caregiver Training (caregivers only), and Nurture Groups (youth-caregiver joint roleplay activities), which is conducted prior to youth's release.

Other names: TBRI

Trust-based Relational Intervention In-Home Structured Coaching

Behavioral

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI In-Home Structured Training includes four structured in-home coaching sessions.

Other names: TBRI Structured Coaching

Trust-based Relational Intervention In-Home Responsive Coaching

Behavioral

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI In-Home Responsive Training includes at least 2 structured in-home coaching sessions plus additional sessions indefinitely as needed.

Other names: TBRI Responsive Coaching

Primary outcomes

  1. Youth days to opioid (and other substance use) initiation

    Time frame: 15 months

    Initiation to opioid and other substance use (e.g., alcohol, marijuana, methamphetamine) over 15 months follow-up in days, measured by the scale of Timeline follow-back, Substance Use Involvement (i.e., during the past 30 days, how many days did you use alcohol or drugs; developed by the HEAL Prevention Cooperative), urinalysis results. Scores: 0-450 days; a higher score indicating a better outcome.

  2. Youth months to opioid (and other substance use) initiation

    Time frame: 15 months

    Initiation to opioid and other substance use over 15 months follow-up in months, monthly check-ins (any opioid use; any alcohol, other drug use in the past month). Scores: 0-15 months; a higher score indicating a better outcome.

  3. Youth substance use severity

    Time frame: 15 months

    Opioid use and other substance use (e.g., alcohol, marijuana, methamphetamine) over 15 months; measured by TCU Drug Screen 5 and TCU Drug Screen 5 - Opioid Supplement. Scores: 0-11, a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-regulation (youth) - positive and negative urgency

    Time frame: 15 months

    TCU Adolescent Thinking Forms (TCU THK); Scores: 10-50; a higher score indicating a worse outcome

  2. Self-regulation (youth) - delayed discounting

    Time frame: 15 months

    Delay Discounting Task; Scores: 1-13; a higher score indicating a better outcome

  3. Self-regulation (youth) - emotion regulation

    Time frame: 15 months

    Difficulties in Emotion Regulation. Scores: 1-5, a higher score indicating a worse outcome

  4. Self-regulation (youth) - executive functioning

    Time frame: 15 months

    Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale-Child and Adolescent Short Form. Scores: 1-4, a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

  5. Self-efficacy (youth)

    Time frame: 15 months

    Two items (developed by the HEAL Prevention Cooperative) assessing how confident participants not misuse prescription or heroin in the next 30 days. Scores: 0-4, a higher score indicating a better outcome

  6. Social exposure to alcohol, marijuana, heroin, and prescription opioids (youth)

    Time frame: 15 months

    Four items, developed by the HEAL Prevention Cooperative, to assess social exposure to alcohol, marijuana, heroin, and prescription opioids (i.e., how often the adult who is most important to the participant drink alcohol or use marijuana, heroin, and prescription opioids). Scores: 0-3, a higher score indicating a worse outcome

  7. Behavioral problems (youth)

    Time frame: 15 months

    Behavioral problems in the areas of peer problems, hyperactivity, emotional problems, and conduct problems, assessed by the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. Scores: 0-40, a higher score indicating a worse outcome

  8. Prosocial behavior (youth)

    Time frame: 15 months

    Prosocial behavior is assessed by the Prosocial subscale of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. Scores: 0-10, a higher score indicating a better outcome.

  9. Monthly check-ins on behavioral misconduct (youth)

    Time frame: 15 months

    Monthly check-ins asking any truancy, trouble with the law during the last month. Scores: 0 (no) or 1 (yes, being involved in the behavioral misconduct).

  10. Anxiety (both youth and caregivers)

    Time frame: 15 months

    Assessed by the General Anxiety Disorder (GAD) -7. Scores: 0-3, a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

  11. Depression (both youth and caregivers)

    Time frame: 15 months

    Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). Scores: 0-3, a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

  12. Pain (both youth and caregivers)

    Time frame: 15 months

    Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain domain. Scores: 0-3, a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

  13. Youth and caregiver relationship

    Time frame: 15 months

    Assessed by the Experiences in Close Relationships. Scores: 1-7, a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

  14. Family relationship

    Time frame: 15 months

    Assessed by the Family Assessment Device. Scores: 1-4, a higher score indicating a better outcome.

  15. Monthly check-ins on anxiety, depression, and stress in the relationship with caregiver/safe adult (youth)

    Time frame: 15 months

    Monthly check-ins asking any increase in anxiety, depression, or stress in the relationship with caregiver/safe adult. Scores: 0 (no) or 1 (yes, there is an increase in the past month).

Other outcomes

  1. Frequency of receiving substance use treatment

    Time frame: 15 months

    Frequency of receiving substance use treatment (alcohol, illegal drug use). Scores: 0 (never), 1 (once), or 2 (more than once), a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

  2. Times of hospital visits related to substance use

    Time frame: 15 months

    Times of hospital visits related to substance use. Scores: 0 - the number of times. A higher score indicating a worse outcome.

  3. Times of treatment referral for substance use

    Time frame: 15 months

    Times of treatment referral for substance use. Scores: 0 - the number of times. A higher score indicating a worse outcome.

  4. Frequency of opioid overdose

    Time frame: 15 months

    Frequency of opioid overdose. Scores: 0 (never), 1 (once), or 2 (more than once), a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

  5. Receipt of Narcan for opioid overdose

    Time frame: 15 months

    Receipt of Narcan for opioid overdose. Scores: 0 (no) or 1 (yes), a score of 1 indicating a worse outcome.

  6. Recidivism

    Time frame: 15 months

    Whether or not youth are re-arrest (0 = no, 1 = yes) or re-adjudicated (0 = no, 1 = yes). The information will come from JJ agency youth records. A score of 1 indicating a worse outcome.

  7. Recidivism

    Time frame: 15 months

    Days between discharge and youth's re-arrest and re-adjudication. The information will come from JJ agency youth records. Scores: 0-450 days, a higher score indicating a better outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Texas Christian University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Preventing Opioid Use Among Justice-involved Youth as They Transition to Adulthood: Leveraging Safe Adults (LeSA)

Acronym: LeSA

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 22, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 12, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.