Prevent It 2.0/PRIORITY - An iCBT to Reduce the Risk of Committing Child Sexual Abuse

SSAS; scores for each item range from 0 to 4; total scores range from 0 to 48; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more sexual urges involving children]

There's no scoring system at the moment. It's all item-by-item. But for all items, higher values indicate a worse outcome [e.g., more hours watching CSAM, etc.]

There's no scoring system at the moment. It's all item-by-item. But for all items, higher values indicate a worse outcome [e.g., more motivation to interact with children, etc.]

Acute-2007-Self-Report (i.e., self-report dynamic risk instrument based on the file coded Acute-2007; each item is scored as 0 = [no], 1 = [sometimes], and 3 = [often/frequently], with the exception of one item that is scored 0 = [no] and 1 = [yes]; total scores can range from 0 to 41; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., greater risk of engaging in sexual behaviors involving children]

Each item is scored on a Likert scale from 1 = [never] to 5 = [daily]; total scores range from 4 to 20; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more sexual preoccupation]

Each item is scored on a Likert scale from 1 = [never] to 5 = [very often]; total scores each item is scored on a Likert scale from 1 = [never] to 5 = [very often]; total scores range from 12 to 60; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., less sexual self-control]

Each item is scored on a Likert scale from 1 = [never] to 5 = [very often]; total scores range from 7 to 35; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more sexualized coping/using sex to cope]

Each item is scored on a Likert scale from 1 = [strongly disagree] to 4 = [strongly agree]; total scores range from 5 to 20; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more emotional congruence with children]),

Each item is scored on a Likert scale from 0 = [strongly disagree] to 4 = [strongly agree]; total scores range from 0 to 32; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more cognitions supportive of child sexual exploitation and abuse]

i.e., "About how often did you drink any alcohol in the past week/month?", item is scored from 0 = [did not drink any] to 4 = [7 days a week]; "Think of all of the times you had alcohol in the past week/month. When you drank alcohol, how much did you usually have at one time, on average during this week/month?", item is open ended response of number of glasses; higher scores indicate greater alcohol consumption

PHQ-9; each item is scored on a Likert scale from 0 = [not at all] to 3 = [nearly every day]; total scores can range from 0 to 27; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more negative affect]

Each item is scored on a Likert scale from -2 = [strongly disagree] to +2 = [strongly agree]; total scores for precontemplation, contemplation and action stages range from -4 to +4; higher scores indicate greater likelihood that the participant is in that stage of change

i.e., "How do you usually spend most of your free time?" and "Who do you usually spend most of your free time with?"; respondent selects all category options that apply [e.g., categories include things like "doing sports, lazing around, watching television, etc."

F-SozU K6; each item is scored on a Likert scale from 1 = [Note true at all/Does not apply] to 5 = [Very true/Exactly applicable]; total scores range from 6 to 30; higher scores indicate a better outcome [i.e., more perceived social support]

NEQ-20; taps the occurrence [binary, yes or no] and severity [on a 5-point Likert scale 0-4, ranging from "not at all" to "extremely"] of 20 statements regarding negative effects of psychological treatment and ends with one free-text question. For each statement answered with yes , the respondent also reports whether they believe the negative effect is caused by "the treatment I received" or "other circumstances". Maximum score = 80, Minimum score = 0

Each item is scored on a Likert scale from 0 = [I disagree completely] to 3 = [I completely agree]; total scores range from 0 to 225; higher scores indicate more paraphilic interests

i.e., "Have you ever been charged for a non-violent criminal offense, excluding minor traffic violations", "Have you ever been charged for a non-sexual violent offense", "Have you ever been charged for a non-contact sexual offense", and "Have you ever been charged for a contact sexual offense"; items are scored as dichotomous ratings of 1 = [yes] and 0 = [no]; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more prior criminal charges]

i.e., "What is your current relationship status", for this item respondent selects all categorical responses that apply to their current relationship status [e.g., Married/ in a civil partnership and living together, Married/ in a civil partnership and not living together, In a steady relationship and living together, etc.]; "How many previous cohabitating romantic partner have you had?", for this item respondent selects 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or more; higher scores indicate more historical relationship instability

i.e., "Have you maintained stable employment or continued enrollment in educational studies over the last year leading up to your enrollment in this program", item is scored according to a dichotomous rating of 0 = [yes] and 1 = [no]; "Have you ever been unemployed or dropped out of school for a period of a year or more?", item is scored according to a dichotomous rating of 0 = [no] and 1 = [yes]; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more historical education/employment instability]

AUDIT-C; each item is scored from 0 to 4; total scores range from 0 to 12; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more alcohol use/abuse]

i.e., "How important is religion/spirituality in your life?", item is scored on a Likert scale from 0 = [Not at all important] to 3 = [Very important]; "How often do you engage in religious/spiritual practice?", item is scored on a Likert scale from 0 = [Never] to 3 = [Every day]; higher scores indicate greater religiosity/spirituality

Ratings of "yes" for dichotomous variables and ratings of "once or twice" to "very often" for frequency items are scored as 1 [exposed to ACE), while ratings of "no" or "never" are rated as 0 [not exposed], a domain is rated as 1 = "exposed to ACE" if the respondent indicates exposure to at least one item in that domain; total scores range from 0 to 8; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., greater exposure to adverse childhood experiences]

RAADS-14; all items are scored from 0 to 3, total scores range from 0 to 42; higher scores indicate more autism spectrum symptoms

Each item is scored on a Likert scale from 1 = [never] to 5 = [daily]; total scores range from 5 to 25; higher scores indicate a worse outcome [i.e., more prior child sexual abuse behaviors]

i.e., a well-validated instrument for assessing static risk of sexual abuse that is usually file coded; total scores can range from -3 to 12; higher scores indicate greater risk of engaging in sexual abuse