Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05950867

Prevalence of Wild-type TTR Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients With Polyneuropathy of Unknown Cause.

To investigate to what extent chronic axonal length-dependent polyneuropathy (CAP) and/or small-fiber neuropathy (SFN) is part of early non-cardiac manifestations of wild-type TTR cardiac amyloidosis (wtTTR-CA).

Consequently, explore whether this could ultimately lead to faster diagnosis and clinical outcome of wild-type TTR cardiac amyloidosis (wtTTR-CA).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UZ Brussel

Jette, Belgium Capital City, 1090, Belgium

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Steven Droogmans, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+32 2 477 60 09

Steven Droogmans, MD, Phd

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Veronique Bissay, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+32 2 477 68 01

Véronique Bissay, MD, Phd

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Patients with chronic axonal length-dependent polyneuropathy (CAP) and/or small-fiber neuropathy (SFN) without well-defined cause will be recruited after a neurological standard routine work-up with NCS (Nerve conduction study) test, EMG, and Sudoscan®, previously performed at the neurology department of UZ-Brussel in normal clinical setting. All participants will be invited to the Neurology and Cardiology department for one visit on one day, for the following assessments:

Following exams will be performed:

  • assessment of symptoms, severity, and duration of the polyneuropathy and the use of NTSS-6 and COMPASS31 score for mapping somatosensory and autonomic symptoms
  • evaluation of objective polyneuropathy signs, using following scales: mPND, NIS
  • Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
  • Electrocardiogram (ECG)
  • Echocardiography

The following retrospective data from the medical file will be analyzed:

  • assessment of medical history, medical treatment, and demographic data
  • assessment of laboratory results (and, if applicable, other exams) extracted from the medical file and previously performed in the context of polyneuropathy workup
  • assessment of previously performed NCV/EMG data and Sudoscan®, extracted from the medical file of the participants.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with chronic axonal length-dependent polyneuropathy (CAP) and/or small-fiber neuropathy (SFN) without well-defined etiology.
  • Age: >= 60 years
  • Male and female gender
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Known cause of polyneuropathy
  • Other types of peripheral neuropathy than chronic axonal length-dependent polyneuropathy (CAP) and/or small-fiber neuropathy (SFN).
  • Patients younger than 60 years

Treatment and study plan

ECG + echocardiography

Diagnostic Test

Electrocardiogram and echocardiography

Answering questionnaires

Other

Answering questionnaires about polyneuropathy symptoms (NTSS -6, COMPASS31, NIS, mPND) and also cardialogical symptoms (KCCQ-12).

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome: Evaluation of prevalence of wild-type cardiac amyloidosis in our CAP and/or SFN population without well known cause.

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis by doing a cardiac screening for wild-type cardiac amyloidosis with performing an echocardiography.

    Echocardiography criteria: LV wall (>12mm), left ventricular ejection fraction (%), Apical sparing pattern (y/n), diastolic dysfunction (y/n), left atrial volume (ml/m2).

    Left atrial volume in ml and LA volume in ml/m2, whereby m2 is the body surface area based on weight and height (Mosteller formula).

  2. Primary Outcome: Evaluation of prevalence of wild-type cardiac amyloidosis in our CAP and/or SFN population without well known cause

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis by doing a cardiac screening for wild-type cardiac amyloidosis with performing an ECG.

    ECG criteria: atrial fibrillation (y/n), QRS-duration, low voltage (y/n)

  3. Primary Outcome: Evaluation of prevalence of wild-type cardiac amyloidosis in our CAP and/or SFN population without well known cause

    Time frame: 36 months

    Prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis by doing a cardiac screening for wild-type cardiac amyloidosis with performing a questionnaire (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire).

    KCCQ-12 has 4 domains (Physical Limitation Score, Symptom Frequency Score, Quality of Life Score, Social Limitation Score) and one Summary Score. Scores are scaled 0-100, where 0 denotes the lowest reportable health status and 100 the highest.

    This descriptive score will be used as a functional parameter without a cut-off.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcome: severity and evolution

    Time frame: 36 months

    Considering the rather small study population and the rarity of wtTTR amyloidosis, statistical analyses cannot be used without massively overfitting the results, which will not be reproducible. The investigators consequently opt for descriptive statistics to compare the group of polyneuropathy patients with wt-Ca and those without wt-CA. Therefore a few parameters are examined. The first scale used therefore is the modified Polyneuropathy Disability score (mPND). This scale is a questionnaire with a few questions about the complaints of the polyneuropathy in the daily life. O means no complaints of the polyneuropathy in daily life, IV means a major impact on the daily life of the patient.

  2. Secondary outcome: severity and evolution

    Time frame: 36 months

    Considering the rather small study population and the rarity of wtTTR amyloidosis, statistical analyses cannot be used without massively overfitting the results, which will not be reproducible.

    The investigators consequently opt for descriptive statistics to compare the group of polyneuropathy patients with wt-Ca and those without wt-CA. Therefore a few parameters are examined. The second scale used therefore is the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS).This scale is a questionnaire with a few questions about the complaints of the polyneuropathy in the daily life. The score is between 0 and 244. O means less complaints in the daily life, 244 means major impact in the daily life of the patient.

  3. Secondary outcome: severity and evolution

    Time frame: 36 months

    Considering the rather small study population and the rarity of wtTTR amyloidosis, statistical analyses cannot be used without massively overfitting the results, which will not be reproducible.

    The investigators consequently opt for descriptive statistics to compare the group of polyneuropathy patients with wt-Ca and those without wt-CA. Therefore a few parameters are examined. The third scale used therefore is the Neuropathy Total Symptom Score - Health Care professional administered version (NTSS-6). This scale is a questionnaire with a few items about the symptoms of the polyneuropathy in the daily life (aching pain, burning pain, prickling sensation, numbness, lancinating pain and allodynia). Depending on the presence of the symptoms in time and strength, a score will show up. On each symptom you can score a maximum of 3,66. So the total score for this scale is 21,96 if the patients has major complaints in daily life.

  4. Secondary outcome: severity and evolution

    Time frame: 36 months

    Considering the rather small study population and the rarity of wtTTR amyloidosis, statistical analyses cannot be used without massively overfitting the results, which will not be reproducible.

    The investigators consequently opt for descriptive statistics to compare the group of polyneuropathy patients with wt-Ca and those without wt-CA. Therefore a few parameters are examined. The fourth scale used therefore is the Composite Autonomic Symptom score (COMPASS-31). This scale is a questionnaire with a 31 questions about the complaints in the daily life and also if there complaints/symptoms on the autonomic system. A few questions are asked about different domains (orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal system, bladder, pupillomotor).The total score is minimal 0 and maximal 75 raw counted (100 weighted).Each domain had a weighting factor to be count depending on the answers of the patient.

  5. Secondary outcome: red flags that could increase the awareness of neurologists for wild-type TTR-cardiac amyloidosis

    Time frame: 36 months

    The red flags for wild-type TTR cardiac amyloidosis are among others carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), wich can be detected by performing an electromyography (EMG).

  6. Secondary outcome: red flags that could increase the awareness of neurologists for wild-type TTR-cardiac amyloidosis

    Time frame: 36 months

    The red flags for wild-type TTR cardiac amyloidosis are among others spinal canal stenosis.

  7. Secondary outcome: red flags that could increase the awareness of neurologists for wild-type TTR-cardiac amyloidosis

    Time frame: 36 months

    The red flags for wild-type TTR cardiac amyloidosis are among others trigger finger.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Véronique Bissay, MD,Phd

CONTACT

[email protected]

+32 2 477 68 01

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prevalence of Wild-type TTR Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients With Polyneuropathy of Unknown Cause: a Prospective Monocentric Study (CAP-TTR)

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 18, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.