Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07691112

Prevalence of Chapman Reflex Points in Medical Students and Their Association With Visceral Symptoms

Chapman Reflex Points (CRPs) are small palpable nodules found within connective tissue that have traditionally been associated with dysfunction of internal organs and the autonomic nervous system. However, little is known about how commonly these findings occur in healthy individuals or whether they are associated with symptoms experienced by otherwise healthy people.

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of Chapman Reflex Points in young healthy adults and to evaluate whether the presence and distribution of these points are associated with self-reported visceral symptoms. Participants complete a standardized health questionnaire regarding recent and recurrent symptoms and undergo a blinded physical examination of established Chapman Reflex Point locations performed by a trained investigator. The results of this study may improve understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying Chapman Reflex Points and help clarify their potential role in preventive osteopathic assessment and early identification of altered autonomic, lymphatic, fascial, or neuroendocrine function.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine - Harlem

New York, 10027, United States

About this study

Chapman Reflex Points (CRPs) are discrete palpable nodules located within deep fascial tissues that have historically been interpreted as viscerosomatic reflex manifestations associated with dysfunction of specific internal organs. Traditional osteopathic models suggest that CRPs develop secondary to altered autonomic activity and lymphatic dysfunction resulting from visceral pathology. More recent mechanobiological investigations have proposed that fascial contractility mediated by myofibroblasts, sympathetic regulation of lymphatic vessel function, connective tissue remodeling, and neuroendocrine influences may contribute to the formation and persistence of these palpable findings.

Despite their longstanding use in osteopathic diagnosis and treatment, there is limited evidence regarding the prevalence of CRPs in healthy individuals, and relatively few studies have investigated whether the presence of CRPs correlates with self-reported visceral symptoms in populations without significant underlying disease. Improved characterization of CRP prevalence and symptom associations may provide insight into whether these findings represent markers of overt pathology, subclinical physiological modulation, or normal biological variation.

This study was designed as a cross-sectional observational investigation to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of CRPs in a young adult population and to explore potential relationships between CRP findings and participant-reported visceral symptoms. Participants completed a standardized health questionnaire designed to assess demographic characteristics, medical history, lifestyle factors, and recent or recurrent symptoms across multiple organ systems. Following questionnaire completion, participants underwent a systematic palpatory examination of established Chapman Reflex Point locations performed by a single trained investigator who was blinded to questionnaire responses. Consistent palpatory techniques, including standardized pressure application and examination duration, were utilized to improve examination reproducibility.

Participant data were recorded using anonymized study identification numbers to maintain confidentiality. Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel and STATA software. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize participant demographics and CRP prevalence. Sex-based differences in total CRP counts were evaluated using Welch's two-sample t-test. Associations between individual Chapman Reflex Points and symptom clusters were assessed using stepwise regression analyses, while relationships between grouped CRPs and grouped visceral symptom scores were examined using bivariate linear regression techniques. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided p-value of less than 0.05.

The findings from this study are intended to contribute to a contemporary understanding of Chapman Reflex Point physiology by integrating concepts related to autonomic regulation, lymphatic function, fascial mechanotransduction, and endocrine modulation. Further investigation may help clarify the potential utility of CRPs as markers of early physiological alterations and inform their role in preventive osteopathic assessment and individualized patient evaluation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide informed consent.
  • Willingness to complete a standardized health questionnaire.
  • Willingness to undergo a blinded palpatory examination of established Chapman Reflex Point locations.

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals younger than 18 years of age.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
  • Inability or unwillingness to complete the health questionnaire.
  • Inability or unwillingness to undergo the palpatory examination.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Incomplete study data or questionnaire responses.

Treatment and study plan

Chapman Reflex Point Examination

Procedure

Participants underwent a standardized palpatory examination of established Chapman Reflex Point locations performed by a single trained investigator who was blinded to questionnaire responses. Consistent pressure application and examination duration were utilized to optimize reliability and reproducibility of palpatory findings. No therapeutic intervention, osteopathic manipulative treatment, medication administration, or other clinical intervention was provided as part of the study. Participants also completed a standardized health questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics, medical history, lifestyle factors, and recent or recurrent visceral symptoms.

Other names: Chapman Reflex Point Assessment, Palpatory Examination of Chapman Reflex Points

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of Chapman Reflex Points

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

    The prevalence and distribution of Chapman Reflex Points identified during a standardized palpatory examination of established Chapman Reflex Point locations performed by a blinded trained investigator. The total number of Chapman Reflex Points observed per participant was recorded and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Association Between Chapman Reflex Points and Visceral Symptom Clusters

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Associations between organ system-specific Chapman Reflex Point counts and self-reported visceral symptom clusters were evaluated using stepwise regression analyses and bivariate linear regression models.

  2. Sex Differences in Chapman Reflex Point Prevalence

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Differences in the total number of Chapman Reflex Points identified among male and female participants were assessed using Welch's two-sample t-test.

Other outcomes

  1. Distribution of Organ System-Specific Chapman Reflex Points

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

    The frequency of Chapman Reflex Points corresponding to individual organ systems, including pulmonary and lower gastrointestinal groupings, was assessed descriptively.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The Touro College and University System

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 8, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.