Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06913140

Preoperative Ultrasound Guided Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Costoclavicular Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy

This study was conducted to compare the perioperative analgesic effect of ultrasound guided high thoracic erector spinae plane block versus ultrasound guided costoclavicular block for shoulder arthroscopy

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Tanta University

Tanta, El-Gharbia, 31527, Egypt

About this study

Shoulder surgery is one of the most common orthopedic surgical procedures that causes severe pain . Pain management in such patients is very important because pain relief allows early mobilization, effective postoperative rehabilitation, and shorter hospitalization stays. Several regional anesthesia techniques have been used for pain management following shoulder surgery. Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is the gold standard analgesic technique for shoulder procedures, but this method can lead to some serious complications, such as hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP), Horner's syndrome, and hoarseness.

The costoclavicular block (CCB) was introduced as infraclavicular approach, first described in 2015 , targets the brachial plexus in the costoclavicular space where its three cords are tightly clustered together lateral to the axillary artery and more superficially than with the classical approach of infraclavicular fossa . Recently, Garcia-Vittoria et al have suggested that the costoclavicular space could also serve as a retrograde channel to supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks, so if local anesthetic (LA) injected in the costoclavicular space can reliably reach the supraclavicular brachial plexus enabling reliable anesthesia including anesthesia to the suprascapular nerve during shoulder surgery, one could achieve analgesic parity with small-volume supraclavicular block (and ISB) while retaining the 0% incidence of HDP seen with infraclavicular blocks.

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively novel block and was first described for chronic thoracic neuropathic pain in 2016 (. It is an interfascial plane block, but it may be classified as a paraspinal block due to its mechanism of action and injection site

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 90 patients admitted for elective unilateral shoulder arthroscopy.
  • Aged (21 - 65) years.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical activity I, II

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patient with neurological deficit.
  • Patient with bleeding disorders (coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia anticoagulant and antiplatelets drugs).
  • Uncooperative patient.
  • Infection at the block injection site.
  • Patients with history of allergy to local anaesthetics

Treatment and study plan

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Drug

Patients received (20ml) plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected beneath the erector spinae muscle sheath at the level of the second thoracic segment (T2)

Other names: Bupivacaine 0.25%

Costoclavicular block

Drug

Patients received (20ml) plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected in the costoclavicular space lateral to axillary artery.

Other names: Bupivacaine 0.25%

Control group

Drug

Patients received sham block

Other names: Sham block

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Pethidine consumption

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

    Each patient was instructed about postoperative pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS (0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable") at (T 30 min, 2, 4, 6,12, 18, 24 h, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were given (ketorolac 30mg) to all patient /8 h and if VAS > 4 intravenous pethidine 0.5 mg / kg per dose.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first analgesic request after surgery

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

    Time to 1st request for the rescue of analgesia (time from the end of surgery till first dose of morphine administrated) was recorded.

  2. Degree of pain

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

    Each patient was instructed about postoperative pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS (0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable") at (T 30 min, 2, 4, 6,12, 18, 24 h, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were given (ketorolac 30mg) to all patient /8 h and if VAS > 4 intravenous pethidine 0.5 mg / kg per dose.

  3. Complications

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

    Complications (Hematoma, pneumothorax, persistent numbness/ paraesthesia or motor deficit one week after the surgery) were recorded.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tanta University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Apr 6, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.