Tanta University
Tanta, El-Gharbia, 31527, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06913140
This study was conducted to compare the perioperative analgesic effect of ultrasound guided high thoracic erector spinae plane block versus ultrasound guided costoclavicular block for shoulder arthroscopy
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tanta, El-Gharbia, 31527, Egypt
Shoulder surgery is one of the most common orthopedic surgical procedures that causes severe pain . Pain management in such patients is very important because pain relief allows early mobilization, effective postoperative rehabilitation, and shorter hospitalization stays. Several regional anesthesia techniques have been used for pain management following shoulder surgery. Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is the gold standard analgesic technique for shoulder procedures, but this method can lead to some serious complications, such as hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP), Horner's syndrome, and hoarseness.
The costoclavicular block (CCB) was introduced as infraclavicular approach, first described in 2015 , targets the brachial plexus in the costoclavicular space where its three cords are tightly clustered together lateral to the axillary artery and more superficially than with the classical approach of infraclavicular fossa . Recently, Garcia-Vittoria et al have suggested that the costoclavicular space could also serve as a retrograde channel to supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks, so if local anesthetic (LA) injected in the costoclavicular space can reliably reach the supraclavicular brachial plexus enabling reliable anesthesia including anesthesia to the suprascapular nerve during shoulder surgery, one could achieve analgesic parity with small-volume supraclavicular block (and ISB) while retaining the 0% incidence of HDP seen with infraclavicular blocks.
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively novel block and was first described for chronic thoracic neuropathic pain in 2016 (. It is an interfascial plane block, but it may be classified as a paraspinal block due to its mechanism of action and injection site
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients received (20ml) plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected beneath the erector spinae muscle sheath at the level of the second thoracic segment (T2)
Other names: Bupivacaine 0.25%
Patients received (20ml) plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected in the costoclavicular space lateral to axillary artery.
Other names: Bupivacaine 0.25%
Patients received sham block
Other names: Sham block
Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Each patient was instructed about postoperative pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS (0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable") at (T 30 min, 2, 4, 6,12, 18, 24 h, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were given (ketorolac 30mg) to all patient /8 h and if VAS > 4 intravenous pethidine 0.5 mg / kg per dose.
Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Time to 1st request for the rescue of analgesia (time from the end of surgery till first dose of morphine administrated) was recorded.
Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Each patient was instructed about postoperative pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS (0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable") at (T 30 min, 2, 4, 6,12, 18, 24 h, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were given (ketorolac 30mg) to all patient /8 h and if VAS > 4 intravenous pethidine 0.5 mg / kg per dose.
Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Complications (Hematoma, pneumothorax, persistent numbness/ paraesthesia or motor deficit one week after the surgery) were recorded.
Tanta University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06010836
Behavior, Communication
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07329010
Arthoplasty, Behavior
Kayseri, Talas, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06018207
Dose, Midazolam
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06025136
Comfort, Dyssomnias
Edirne, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details