Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT02482376

Preoperative Single-Fraction Radiotherapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer

This protocol seeks to build on the favorable results of the investigators' phase I trial (Pro00015617) by extending the findings to a larger cohort of subjects.In this study, the investigators hypothesize that 21Gy (Gray) as a single fraction can be delivered preoperatively to a larger group of subjects (n100).

The primary objective is to determine physician reported rates of good/excellent cosmesis at baseline and 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years post-treatment as measured by the NRG cosmesis scale

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Duke Cancer Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

About this study

The study team hypothesizes that a single fraction of 21Gy can be delivered preoperatively to the intact breast tumor with acceptable cosmetic outcomes. Furthermore, the investigators anticipate that pre- and post-radiation breast tumor samples will provide an avenue for understanding breast cancer radiation response

Rationale for single-fraction preoperative technique

This trial is proposed to build on the favorable results of the investigators' phase I trial by extending the findings to a larger cohort of subjects. The preoperative approach has several advantages:

  • a small intact breast tumor results in significantly less uninvolved breast tissue receiving high radiation doses which likely decreases toxicity;
  • more accurate targeting of the high-risk areas of subclinical disease surrounding the tumor is possible,
  • smaller treatment volumes are amenable to dose escalation which can further accelerate treatment and improve accessibility for subjects,
  • this technical approach is widely utilized in other tumor sites and can be delivered at most radiation facilities
  • the pre-operative approach provides a novel opportunity to study breast cancer radiation response.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with a biopsy proven diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma of the breast

a. Biopsy tissue (either slides or block) from outside institutions will be reviewed to confirm diagnosis.

  • Breast preservation candidates (no prior breast or nodal radiotherapy, no imaging evidence of multicentric or multifocal disease, no pregnant women, and no comorbid conditions precluding surgery)
  • Clinical T1N0M0 invasive carcinoma or Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) < or equal to 2cm
  • 60 years of age or older or 50-59 with a low Oncotype score (0-17) Oncotype is not required for women diagnosed with DCIS.
  • Estrogen receptor positive (ER+), Human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HER2-) HER-2 status is not required for women diagnosed with DCIS.
  • Women of child-bearing potential must consent to use adequate contraception during the course of the study. Female subjects must agree to use a medically acceptable contraceptives including: (1) surgical sterilization (such as a tubal ligation or hysterectomy), (2) approved hormonal contraceptives (such as birth control pills, patches, implants or injections), (3) barrier methods (such as a condom or diaphragm) used with a spermicide, or (4) an intrauterine device (IUD). Contraceptive measures such as Plan B (TM), sold for emergency use after unprotected sex, are not acceptable methods for routine use.
  • White blood cells (WBC) > 3000, Hemoglobin ( Hgb) > 9, platelets >100000 within 30 days of consent
  • Eligible for contrasted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on initial evaluation with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 60 ml/min. A diagnostic MRI ordered within one month will be considered an acceptable alternative and will not be repeated.
  • Outside breast imaging will be reviewed at Duke to confirm findings are consistent with trial eligibility.

Exclusion criteria

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Breast implant in the breast to be treated with SBRT
  • Medical conditions that may increase risk for poor cosmetic outcome (i.e. Lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma)
  • Subjects unable to receive study treatment planning secondary to body habitus or inability to lie flat on the stomach at length
  • HER2 positive
  • Positive serum pregnancy test
  • Insufficient breast imaging to judge clinical stage
  • Subjects without placement of a biopsy clip at the diagnostic procedure who are unwilling to undergo clip placement.
  • Subjects in whom treatment planning constraints cannot be met

Treatment and study plan

Stereotactic body radiotherapy ( SBRT)

Radiation

Single fraction of 21 Gy stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT)delivered pre-operatively to subjects with early stage breast cancer

Other names: SBRT

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Physician Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis

    Time frame: 6 months

    Physician will independently complete the physician NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at the designated time points. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.

  2. Number of Participants With Physician Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis

    Time frame: 1 year

    Physician will independently complete the physician NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at the designated time points. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.

  3. Number of Participants With Physician Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis

    Time frame: 2 years

    Physician will independently complete the physician NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at the designated time points. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.

  4. Number of Participants With Physician Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis.

    Time frame: 3 years

    Physician will independently complete the physician NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at the designated time points. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis

    Time frame: baseline

    Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.

  2. Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis

    Time frame: 6 months

    Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.

  3. Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis

    Time frame: 12 months

    Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.

  4. Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis

    Time frame: 2 year

    Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.

  5. Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis

    Time frame: 3 year

    Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.

  6. Local Control in the Treated Breast Relative to Historic Controls

    Time frame: Through study completion estimated to be 10 years

    Local control consists of annual clinical examination combined with breast imaging

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Duke University

Other

Collaborators

  • Gateway for Cancer Research

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase II Preoperative Single-Fraction Partial Breast Radiotherapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer: Analysis of Pathologic Response

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2032
First posted
Jun 26, 2015
Registry last updated
Mar 17, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.