Rafael M Linhares
Rio de Janeiro, 22776050, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT04286971
This study evaluates the pain score numerical rating, after sciatic analgesic continuous block, in patients with ischemic pain before surgery of limb revascularization. All patients received those blocks to control ischemic severe pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Rio de Janeiro, 22776050, Brazil
Peripheral Obstructive Arterial Disease (PAD) is a disease with a prevalence of 10 to 25% in the population over 55 years, increasing with age, and may have disabling pain as a symptom, and sometimes the surgical approach is required. In the context of public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, where patients need to wait for surgery, the Anesthesiology and Acute Pain service routinely has sciatic nerve analgesic block in the popliteal region as a preoperative procedure.
The primary objective of the present study is to describe a series of cases where the technique was applied in order to relieve the pain of these patients, following the Pain Score Numerical rating as a reference. Secondary objectives will be to describe difficulties associated with the technique and possible associated adverse factors.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 24 hours after placement of sciatic catheter
Numerical Pain Scale (END) self-assessed by the patient before and after 24 hours of continuous analgesic block of the sciatic nerve, with infusion of levobupivacaine 0,125% or ropivacaine 0,2%. The scale score is 0-10 (0= no pain; 10 = pain as bad as can be)
Time frame: 72 hours after placement of sciatic catheter
Numerical Pain Scale (END) self-assessed by the patient before and after 72 hours of continuous analgesic block of the sciatic nerve, with infusion of levobupivacaine 0,125% or ropivacaine 0,2%. The scale score is 0-10 (0= no pain; 10 = pain as bad as can be)
Time frame: 72 hours after placement of sciatic catheter
To report, qualitatively, the presence of variations or difficulties in the use of the technique, such as: failure of the technique (FT); existence of concomitant venous analgesia (VA); inadequate registration of the technique (IR)
Time frame: 72 hours after placement of sciatic catheter
Report, qualitatively, the presence of possible complications, such as: hyperemia of the catheter insertion site (HC); the presence of pus (PUS); catheter displacement (CD)
Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto
Other
Preoperative Continuous Sciatic Perineural Analgesia, as a Bridge Therapy for Ischemic Pain, in Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Revascularization: a Retrospective Descriptive Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06499506
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Sohag, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04434586
Cardiovascular Diseases, Claudication
Lille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05107869
Cardiovascular Diseases, Endothelial Dysfunction
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03206762
Cardiovascular Diseases, Peripheral Vascular Disease
Davenport, Iowa, United States
View Trial Details